GS TMT vs PJT/EVR for MBA Associates
Yes. It's another BB vs EB for MBA associates thread. I understand top BB would be better for non-finance exits/career banking progression and EB for better pay but was curious about GS TMT vs PJT/EVR dynamics.
Many on this forum consider GS TMT the top group you want to be placed in for MF PE exits but does that mean you have (even slightly) better chance in buyside as an MBA associates?
Thoughts?
Following
Assuming you have these offers, I think I would go with GS TMT honestly. If I realize banking isn't for me and I want a better lifestyle, I can imagine coming from this group can garner some great corporate exits. If I like banking? I can always try to lateral to an EB down the line.
Went through the same choices. First, I wouldn't lump Evercore and PJT together. I'd look at it as GS TMT vs Evercore M&A or GS TMT vs PJT RSSG, bec PJT's M&A is not on the same level as Evercore's M&A franchise. If you want to do restructuring, then go to PJT. Between GS and Evercore's M&A businesses, I'd argue for and personally chose Evercore over GS.
Exit into corporate is pretty much on par from ANY (not just GS/EVR) of the top banks. No corp dev job is going to turn you down because you don't have the GS name. Typically, you exit into one of your clients or corporates where you have friends/ colleagues at. I've seen this from every bank at Asso+ levels, including peers at BoA, Citi, Centerview, Moelis and PJT. Exit into PE/Growth/HF is somewhat similar. This is where having the top name does help compared to "Tier 2" brand names. But exit into these more traditional routes (especially larger PE funds) is virtually impossible at the post-MBA level and your PRE-MBA background + personal connection matters MUCH much more than which bank you're at (assuming you're doing M&A and closed relevant deals). I've personally seen more impressive post-MBA exits from Evercore (2 in UMM/MF PE) than GS (I haven't seen or heard of any other than to MM/LMM - please correct me if I'm wrong).
Learning was and should probs be the most important factor. I talked to a lot of folks at both banks and my sense was that you learn more at Evercore. More hands-on experience building out the model as an Associate and dive deeper into the diligence process rather than quickly churning from a deal to another. This isn't to say that you don't learn well at GS... of course you do.
Generalist vs sector. Evercore lets you be a generalist for a year before you commit.
Pay delta is real. For some reason, GS discount is a still a thing today and your pay delta only at first year could be ~$100k. Obviously this gets compounded over your years in banking and only gets larger.
Fwiw, 5ppl I personally know went through this exact choice at the MBA level (spread across past 4 yrs) and 4 chose Evercore while 1 chose GS. The GS person came from a completely non-trad background (Not for profit) pre-MBA while the 4 came from somewhat professional services background (Consulting, accounting, asset management, corporate). At the end of the day, either is a fantastic firm to join and you honestly won't be disadvantage starting at either. Hope this helps.
deleted
MBA programs trend heavily Evercore vs. MS/JPM. The pay delta (as mentioned above) is real.
I'd still gravitate towards Evercore over MS/JPM M&A and also other lower-tiered EBs over lower-tiered BBs' M&A groups. I've personally come across more interesting deals & projects at EBs in general + found my peers, analysts and seniors at EBs to be sharper. I've worked at a top BB (GS/MS) pre-MBA but find EB's assignments to be more of a hybrid between M&A and consulting. This is a generalization to a large degree though. At this point, I think fit with your group might be more important than some of the other factors.
Don't sleep on MS M&A
The PE/HF exit ops are exactly the same across the two, but agree in principal that having pre-mba background helps in either case.
More importantly responding because your comment here was enough for me to be 85% sure who you are so that was an lol knowing you're on here talking up your bank. Maybe just 10% less detail would be better, mate.
Not sure if i'm the person you're thinking of, but been a year plus out of banking since covid and with corporate acq now. Wouldn't say I'm talking up Evercore blindly. GS or any other US BB are better fit for a lot of people depending on their circumstances and priorities.
Bump
PJT RSSG > Goldman TMT
FWIW Evercore and GS actually have the same sized MBA associate class (40-ish), but GS has done $1.2trillion in announced M&A YTD and Evercore has done $280bn YTD.
I would start at GS TMT for career branding and the volume of reps and jump to EVR at VP or higher for the better take at senior levels.
That’s not the best advice.. why join GS, lost a couple of $$$ (~talking abt 250k assuming you stay there till As3), before joining EVR when u can join right away? And no.. there is really no special treatment whatsoever with all the reps you think you might have earned at GS.. you watch way too much wall st movies
Get paid. Choose pjt if rssg if it’s pjt m&a then go to evr
Gs shouldnt even be in the discussion here at post mba level imo
At the MBA level it’s a culture thing between EVR and PJT m&a
Which has the better culture?
In my class (2020), 3 folks who got EVR offer all chose EVR and turned down other options, including GS, JPM, MS, and other EBs. Centerview did not recruit at my school that year so it was out of discussion. I do find those 3 are sharper and generally the "speaker" of the class when everyone is quiet in class.
Do you have an idea where Centerview even recruits for MBAs? Have seen only one associate on LinkedIn
There are several core schools as far as I've heard. Wharton, CBS, Booth, and Stern should be all on the list.
For culture and pay would choose PJT
.
Why did you hate EVR’s culture?
What about CVP as an MBA Associate?
Their high retention means they don’t recruit much out of MBA. They usually do take a couple people, though from very select schools.
This used to be true but now they're hiring a real summer associate class with FT conversions. You're right about the selective school part though.
Top
EB > BB for Post-MBA. The group prestige + buy-side placement factor that drives Analyst decision making just does not apply. Culture, compensation and learning should be the focus. Doing both the coverage and execution will help build a more robust skillet and knowledge base if the intention is to stay in finance.
As for PJT vs. EVR, the personality types are very different. You should go where you fit best.
Interesting point. What's the difference in personality between EVR and PJT? Is EVR more of the bro fratty type whereas PJT is more intellectual?
All the MBA Associates from my M7 class who made the transition to the buyside (MM PE/ Credit/ Long-Only AM) came from EBs. They developed strong modeling and technical skills but also had industry knowledge, their current seats all have a sector focus
Exactly. It's less about being the junior with the best general modeling skill set and starts to be about the whole package (technical skills, pre-mba work experience, sector knowledge etc.)
In that sense, isn’t that the advantage of working in BB over EB? Especially at Goldman where you get industry exposure + execution experience along with various products in BB.
How is this even a question? You’re going to lose out on hundreds of thousands of dollars over the next few years as an MBA associate? For the analysts I guess it doesn’t matter because it’s only 2 years but post MBA you need to make the most you can.
I just accepted my offer for summer associate (at MBA program now)at GS but unfortunately got cut from my top EBs (PJT/EVR/CVP). Do you have any advice on what to do this summer to try to get a full time associate offer at an EB?
You can speak to people you’ve networked with at EBs (call them independents when speaking, people don’t use that term IRL). See if there are spots at the end of the summer. If not you can lateral out at the end of first year. Both of these are extremely realistic and can be done if you want to.
Start indicating your interest from the onset of your internship with folks you networked with at PJT/EVR/CVP
Similique nam dolores nam praesentium. Exercitationem quisquam amet cum autem maiores. Eum eligendi officiis accusantium exercitationem est quia.
Dolorem natus doloribus dolore exercitationem vitae. Velit nostrum repellendus voluptatem voluptatem facere iure. Tempore quis voluptates omnis voluptatem sed atque eos. Est pariatur hic sed vitae.
Sapiente placeat et unde aut. Vero dolorem ut error enim ipsa possimus ad accusamus. Vel modi culpa impedit illum sit cum nulla. Laboriosam id possimus quidem sed accusamus voluptas. Earum in et aliquid nisi. Porro qui vero natus.
Cupiditate ab magnam reprehenderit expedita aut. Mollitia ea quis distinctio aspernatur. Dicta labore qui fugiat optio aut. Non quasi dolores doloribus dolores quisquam exercitationem inventore adipisci. Tempora omnis sapiente quia mollitia aperiam libero. Reprehenderit fuga illum nulla ea. Et rerum quaerat aut vitae laborum iusto facere aliquam.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...
Enim aut perspiciatis eaque minima voluptatum. Facere et soluta officia ipsam. Omnis facere animi quia quam ipsum necessitatibus eveniet corporis. Aut autem fugit est perferendis. Illo omnis velit praesentium quam aperiam. Maxime eveniet neque optio non consequatur voluptas.
Mollitia voluptatem vitae qui ut in magnam eos. Possimus possimus porro id. Temporibus ad excepturi sunt eveniet vero. Non aliquam quas veniam quae incidunt dignissimos dolor.