The last Bloomberg rankings of undergrad business schools (published in 2016) were extremely flawed and no real outlet has attempted to rank undergrad business schools since then so I was wondering what the consensus was on WSO. (keep in mind these are only ug business schools so for example, harvard is not eligible for this list)
https://www.bloomberg.com/features/2016-best-unde…
My opinion
- Upenn (Wharton)
- Cornell (Dyson)
- Georgetown (McDonough)
- Michigan (Ross)
- UVA (McIntire)
- NYU (Stern)
- WUSL (Olin)
- Berkeley (Haas)
- UNC (Kenan-Flagler)
- Boston College (Carroll)
- Notre Dame (Mendoza)
- Villanova
- Texas Austin (McCombs)
- Indiana (Kelley)
- Emory (Goizueta)
For US recruitment put Ivey on the list as well.
Use poets quants MBA full-time ranking. Only exception are Notre Dame and SMU type of strong undergrad programs
depends what we are talking about - if just fin-nance would say
rest are irrelevant imo
Ross
UVA
Berkeley/Stanford
Dartmouth
Dartmouth smokes placement because it's a stronger network and they have winter/spring internships. Downside it's in the middle of no where.
The others are based on finance ranking + undergrad experience. Fuck going to Wharton just because it's Wharton. I'd rather go to Ross for Greek life and Big 10 sports
I believe the OP is referring to undergrad business schools specifically.
T1: Wharton T2: Cornell, Stern T3: Haas, Ross, McIntire, McDonough T4: Mendoza, Marshall, Kenan-Flager, Goizueta
no orders within tiers
Don't want to open Pandora's box, but I'll just rattle off a FEW undergrad business programs that stick out due to reputation and/or experiences I've had with people from those schools. This is NOT an ALL-INCLUSIVE list... I am just stating names I am familiar with through my own experiences.
In no particular order: UT Austin, Georgetown, Wharton, Notre Dame, Michigan, NYU, UVA, UNC, Boston College, IU
Rank These Undergrad Business Schools (Originally Posted: 01/05/2015)
I think the title sums it up. I'm interested in working on the east coast after graduation, although I'm not 100% set on that.
Fordham IU Bloomington, Kelley Boston College Emory Northeastern USC
I only about IU and Emory, so ill give you info on that. Emory grads tend to be recruited by companies in the south and Charolette. IU has a great IB program, and you'll be almost guaranteed a job, a lot of which are in the easy coast, if you are accepted into the IB workshop which is very competitive.
BC is in top 5, USC has great alumni.
@"futureinIB" I've heard that USC has a huge number of alumni in socal, but not as much in nyc. is that true?
Kelley is not better than BC.
kelley is placing a lot of kids every year into IB these days
Is it true that it's hard for USC grads to get east coast placement?
At the NYC office of the BB bank I work at, it's probably something like: BC IU / Emory USC Fordham / Northeastern
Just one data point to consider.
2012 Undergrad Bloomberg B-School Rankings (Originally Posted: 03/21/2012)
welp, the crazy bloomberg rankings are out again. according to them, Notre Dame is now a "dynasty", taking the top spot 3 years in a row.
heres the full list: http://www.businessweek.com/interactive_reports/ugtable_3-20.html
and heres a decently interesting interviewer where the bloomberg guys try to defend their rankings a bit vs. us news, as well as some other interesting info:
http://www.businessweek.com/articles/2012-03-21/chat-transcript-best-un…
Thoughts?
it has no my school so i dont give a damn
Top employers for schools #1-#4 - meaning the top 3 destinations in terms of quantity of graduates going there...
Mendoza (ND) - Deloitte, KPMG, Ernst & Young McIntire (UVA) - PricewaterhouseCoopers, Ernst & Young, KPMG Dyson (Cornell) - Ernst & Young, Citigroup, JP Morgan Chase Wharton (Penn) - Goldman Sachs, Citigroup, Morgan Stanley
Check out Wharton vs the rest... its a joke that they are not #1.
^Just a comment, finance is not the only subject a business school teaches. And not every student wants to do banking.
Wharton is a great business school but too narrow in focus for my tastes. All the schools on here are great.
found it, nvm
SECfinance you may be right about finance not being the end all be all, but I don't think a bunch of Big 4 placements screams diversity regarding job opportunities.
To be fair, Big 4 has accounting, consulting, and advisory work.
businessweek ranking is a joke.
The two schools I recently turned down for a scholarship at a lesser school are now top 15 and top 25 respectively, please tell me I don't end up regretting this decision..
SECIB,
USNWR is a much better indicator of "general prestige" (although with some caveats), and that is what you want to focus on. ND > Wharton? Not so much.
Bloomberg Businessweek Best Undergraduate BSchool 2014 Rankings are Out! (Originally Posted: 04/06/2014)
The new Bloomberg Businessweek ranking came out on April 04,2014. Notre Dame retained their No. 1 position thanks to "fierce student loyalty":
Thoughts? Source: http://www.businessweek.com/articles/2014-04-04/the-complete-ranking-be…
B.S rankings. Wharton is in a league of its own when it comes to undergrad business schools. Where the hell is MIT?
I think in order to be qualified for the ranking the bschool must reach 40% survey response rate from students so maybe that's the reason why MIT is not on the ranking this year.
This sums up my thoughts.
These rankings exist only to sell magazines and advertising. They are utterly worthless.
I agree with @"TNA", but remember that these USN don't necessarily rank based on IBD placement.
That is true. Here's the methodology: 30% student assessment survey 30% academic quality (SAT average, student-faculty ratio, average class size, internship %, hours student spend studying per week) 20% Recruiter survey 10% median salary 10% MBA feeder school score
Sort by median salary and you get something much closer to expectation (or for the purposes of people on this forum, IBD placement).
Surprised to see Tepper so high. Any thoughts?
BusinessWeek 2008 Undergraduate B-School Rankings are Out! (Originally Posted: 03/05/2008)
Yeah, yeah we all don't place too much stock in these rankings, but you must admit that you have to at least take a peek...
Copied and Pasted from CC:
Official Link: http://bwnt.businessweek.com/interactive_reports/undergrad_bschool/
Good News: Cornell AEM jumped to #4, good since I was just accepted there today :D Bad News: Northeastern Slipped a shitload, bad since I got a full-ride there Yesterday :/
Let the bitching begin!
as a bing alum, let me tell you the truth. i shoulda went to NYU Stern or Cornell
these rankings are bs, i don't go to carnegie, in fact i don't like the school in general, but they have amazing recruiting, firmwide internships with tons of fortune 100 firms, they don't even accept transfer students because nobody ever transfers out. it def deserves to be higher than #22. wasn't nyu stern #2 or 3 on US news and ranking? more recruiters than anywhere, stellar education for undergrad+mba, 9 is kind've low.
and BC at number 14 when carnegie's 22? what the hell are they basing this on? They gave Carnegie a C for recruiting last year...go on their website and there's a huge alumni network and lists of recruiters. BC is more alumni-based and not a lot of firmwide picks, lots of finance/ops bs, i'm not sure about top 20, but def a good school regardless of its ranking.
Meh, I would think UT/UNC/UCB need to be higher than BYU.
And Norte Dame? Is there really that much recruiting there?
a little surprised wisconsin is so low, some rankings have them at 13
what is wrong with these people? Their rankings are just a desperate cry for attention because no credible ranking could flucuate that much from year to year. Honestly, any ranking that has MIT/Berkley as 9&11 should not be taken seriously. Notre Dame # 3? Give me a break. Someone should really get fired over there for coming up with these dumb ranking. BYU/NYU/EMORY(????????????)/Nortre Dame before MIT huh?
These rankings are really bad. Damn, university of florida is way better than southern methodist or bentley or those other ones that are high up.
Honestly, no one gives a shit about these rankings. I would be surprised if more than 30% of people involved in interviewing/resume screening are aware of the rankings... also probably the most obvious sign of a weak resume or insecurity is someone talking about their UG b-school ranking.
These only matter to high school seniors applying to college and the Dean's of the schools. Is Emory even a target school?
The detailed breakdown of how each school got ranked can be found here:
http://bwnt.businessweek.com/interactive_reports/undergrad_bschool/
The little paragraph at the top describes why/how certain leaps in the tables were made. If someone can find the same table but for last year, that may also help in explaining the rankings.
And believe it or not, recruiters do take these rankings into account or at least know the relative position of the schools they are interviewing at on the list...
I don't believe that recruiters give any stock to the rankings at all. I think you're full of shit.
Everything is subjective on these lists. Who cares how a school is ranked. It's just another way for people to look at their peers and quantify themselves over someone else based around a trivial list. Now that you mention it, "The List" was on tonight. Take a look at that great South Park episide and then bring this up. Just proves how trivial this kind of shit is.
Meehgs,
What bank do you work at and how do you know they take into account the rankings? From my experience it's basically banks like to recruit schools people in the bank attended. Rankings like this mean jack sh*t. Really. Think of all the Iveys without BBA programs. Also, these are a total joke. US News & World Report is much more reliable, and their top three (there is a tie for third), rank 1, 6, 9, 11 on this list. I would also like to see how UVA/Michigan/Cal are ranked so differently, when they tend to be very similar. And BYU at 7 is a complete joke.. and Emory that high - please.
Hey Buck, I don't work anywhere yet :-) Still in college but with SA offers. I do know that the head of my school's recruitment team at a top BB mentioned how my major had received a pretty good ranking last year and we were expected to move higher this year (which we did - this was before the rankings were released). It was also mentioned in another superday I had by an interviewer not from my school. Granted, the talk was more general (so how does your program compare to others? Have you looked at rankings? How would you say it prepares you for this type of work?). Hope that helps...
I think somebodies panties are in a riff because their school didn't get ranked high enough. These rankings aren't based on placement to BB banks or top PE firms. For instance BYU is consistently in the top 3 for their accounting program and has a pipeline of students going to the Big 4 firms. Although not a target for many banks, many students do get jobs in Investment Banking. Additionally, this is a business school ranking for undergraduate programs, which means all the schools that don't have an undergraduate business program such as Harvard and Duke aren't competing with them in the rankings
The "A+" bucket of schools is a better list.
Meehgs is obviously a retard... Buck seems a bit more bright.
That was unnecessary.
univ of Florida better than SMU and Bentley? I think Bentley is a shit school full of rich kids that couldn't get into a decent school, but it is still leaps ahead of UoF. Give me a break... There's always 1 or 2 SMU and Bentley kids in a class.
Krakauer, I think you may be reading the list from the bottom up... UF (is that the proper abbreviation?) was ranked 46 while SMU and Bently were ranked 23 and 30, respectively.
U.S. News' undergrad business ranking is based purely on surveys from deans and faculty members, of course it's gonna make a lot more sense than some journalist, who doesn't know jack about business education, trying to come up with random formulas for calculating the school's "index".
U.S. News' ranking (UPenn, MIT, Berkeley, Michigan, UNC, UVA, Texas...) makes a lot more sense in its methodology, and also in actually placing the better schools on top.
these rankings are a joke and we all know it. US news is far more reliable. To Krauker - the business faculty at UF tops the faculty at Bentley and SMU combined. Some of the professors here taught at places like penn and yale.
R U RAH RAH R U RAH RAH HOO RAH HOO RAH RUTGERS RAH
YAY #50
im an econ major, so im not in RBS anyways
We dropped. RBS was ranked #32 last year by BusinessWeek.
Still, hopefully, I'll be an RBS student, when I get my decision. RBS has a better reputation than Rutgers overall, I think.
There's a difference between how business magazines and the U.S. News looks at business programs vs. banks. I don't think they're necessarily looking at "what the best schools for banking" are. We already know what the target schools at the major banks are. These publications are ranking probably on overall placement into finance (and that includes corporate finance - Fortune 500 and 1000, commercial banking etc.), accounting (Big 4), consulting, marketing and advertising, etc.
That's not to say there's a relatively high correlation between a great school that helps you get a great job (i.e. banking) and their corresponding ranking on lists like this. But just because everyone here happens to think banking and consulting are the top jobs an undergrad can get, therefore the most recruited schools for banking and consulting should be the highest ranked - that isn't how these reviewers think. They're looking generally - and their target market is probably the average college kid (or parents) who wants to find a decent job after school - not necessarily banking.
GameTheory is the only person on this thread that's posted a meaningful and thought-out response.
Everyone that goes to undergraduate business school doesn't want to be an investment banker or a management consultant.
I was replying to someone's post -- not commenting on the rankings.
People at A LOT OF SCHOOLS have taught at "Penn and Yale".
All my posts were very carefully thought out.
In all seriousness, I think too much weight is given to shit like "student-teacher ratio" or "study abroad programs" etc. The two most important factors should be intelligent students and perceived reputation. Intelligent students will eventually change the reputation of a school and that reputation is what drives recruiting. And let's be real, recruiting is the #1 reason to pick a business school.
On a tangent, it really annoys me to hear people defend schools like Bentley or UF or whatever as "actually they are great business schools because of X". The bottom line is students there on average just are not as smart- nothing, not where the professors formerly taught, not spending per student, is going to bridge that gap.
i agree on your last point - 100% true.
it's difficult to rank undergrad b-schools. imo, i view the top 20 as highly reputable. anything above that is subjective and not very useful.
It's hard to put too much stock into these rankings, but as a non-target it does suck to see your respective school so low on the list.
That said, if you think these rankings matter in the workplace, they don't unless you let them. I received 5 SA offers coming from a school in the latter-half of the 70's. During interviews I chose to bring up my school's weak ranking and describe how I felt I compensated for it. Usually the person I was interviewing with had no idea what the rankings were to begin with.
This just doesn't ring true. In this economy, coming from a school 35-70, getting 5 SA offers? Unless you orally pleasured Jimmy Cayne while getting a 4.0, I just don't see it happening... especially after you display the unawareness to even bring up your school's shitty ranking.
Sorry, don't know why I am such an a**hole today... guess I'm channeling mark klein MD.
This is a great thread, everyone can just complain about subjective data that has little to do with banking. The targets and semi-targets have the best pipelines into banking, period. This is a subjective list ranking the undergraduate b-school overall. The rankings are worth little besides maybe a starting point for seniors in highschool. godofsmallthings, I'm sorry that you were waitlisted behind SMU and Bentley kids, keep trying I am sure your former yale professor can recommend you for a great law school.
For the record, I don't go to Bentley or SMU.
I agree about these rankings being futile though. Just wanted to rag on the kid hailing UoF as a superior school.
even at the risk of a flame war, that kid had it coming to him
TheStreet86, I can't open your PM. You need to put something in the subject line.
maybe I'm wrong. All I can say is that if you're smart enough, it doesn't matter whether you do college in some suburban place in west africa or you go to oxford or cambridge because, you will make money.
these rankings are nice to see and to know and they are one data point to consider on a variety of issues.
I mean what about service academies? There are tons of former cadets/midshipmen on the street and the Academies don't have undergrad business programs.
I don't know the stats from other schools, but at least from my b-school, around 75% of our class got placed into either finance or consulting. The rest is marketing, management, teaching, non-profit, grad-schools, and others... So I feel like looking at finance/consulting placement record is a pretty good estimate of the school's quality overall. But other schools might not have the same percentage as we do, so it I might be wrong.
I completely agree with GameTheory. The recruiters aren't interested in banking/mgmt consulting placements. The truth of the matter is, a school like Bentley places exceptionally well into the Big 4 and other finance and accounting positions. The majority of these kids will do their four years, get a solid position, and have what they deem to be a very successful career. Now, part of that is due to location (let's face it, there are a ton of opportunities in Boston) and other factors that don't include intelligence, but all of these things should be factored into what makes a "good" business school. Sure, you could count on one hand the number of kids Bentley sent to investment banks last year, but I don't think that would bother the recruiters at all.
i go to UVA's business school. No.2 my ass.
most of my friends in it (and I) hate it. Stunning professors, but curriculum is stupid.
Ratione sunt autem voluptas itaque neque nihil. Et in excepturi dolore qui ducimus dolor ratione. Id tempora omnis est repellat.
Aut aperiam neque deleniti laudantium. Tempore quia corrupti dolores a alias aspernatur dicta. Dolor repellendus vero cumque quia aut sint.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...
Ea tempore aut dolor itaque corporis illum aliquid. Quaerat harum sapiente cumque minima ipsum tenetur esse. Veritatis et laborum iste ullam. Quis et et hic.
Soluta qui quo aut aut labore molestiae sed saepe. Error praesentium expedita inventore qui. Illo debitis sequi doloremque quam omnis fugit.
Iste expedita ut quidem sit est adipisci nesciunt. Eveniet eos est ut exercitationem itaque. Repellendus tempore ad perspiciatis laboriosam dignissimos. Minima et ut natus omnis omnis quasi consequatur.
Illum harum dolor expedita voluptates. Perspiciatis facere odio omnis qui. Minima ullam eveniet reiciendis.
Saepe dolores quia et eum sit tempore. Expedita ducimus provident quisquam velit iusto ullam. Rerum cupiditate quam aut voluptatem hic laborum earum.
Eum alias harum iste eligendi corporis. Eaque quia nihil nulla et commodi.
Neque exercitationem qui quas et sapiente molestias cumque. Consequuntur a dolores aut rerum et consequatur ea impedit. Fugit tenetur non dolor rerum aspernatur eveniet praesentium maxime. Eos quia vel et dignissimos delectus. Labore voluptatem et ea eum. Labore in natus officiis at sit. Fugit corporis mollitia voluptatum est illum quod quos.
Doloremque ratione modi aut quam saepe. Accusamus modi aut perspiciatis in dolorum at rerum tenetur. Corrupti repudiandae sed assumenda quod hic.
Esse dolorum vel est nulla beatae. Aut id aut voluptates porro illum. Sit in excepturi culpa doloribus illum cum ipsum. Ut laborum provident sed. In corporis qui modi neque cupiditate in et. Vel facilis qui rerum voluptas corrupti aut.
Doloribus porro dolores mollitia dignissimos minus amet nihil. Assumenda consequatur fugit asperiores eaque maxime fugit. Sed quia et ad nulla quam ex et. Illum atque velit neque et sequi amet. Tempora pariatur est repellendus neque corrupti ut et aliquid. Hic quae porro minima eos tempore dolorem quo.
Voluptatum voluptas excepturi qui rem possimus molestiae est. Sit corrupti facere quis exercitationem. Et facilis ut aut tenetur.
Ad dignissimos pariatur sequi laudantium. Quo est odio iste numquam qui. Voluptatem magnam voluptas rem accusantium et. Voluptatem voluptas enim omnis quis delectus. Magni soluta repellat dicta enim. Dicta dolor ipsam voluptatibus et explicabo libero.
Quibusdam reiciendis qui beatae placeat rerum. Reiciendis odio aliquam dolor quam corrupti. Explicabo ea qui saepe. Ab et et aspernatur similique autem molestiae aliquid asperiores. Rerum non quas quia dolorum consequatur nostrum.
Labore sed quia quisquam veniam. Animi iusto explicabo ipsa dolorem alias harum.