Why is Royal Dutch Shell selling so much lower than net asset value per share? The current NAVPS is £27 but only trades for £14 and the share price has never exceeded NAVPS in the last 5 years. Am I missing something?
| +152 | How to stop feeling like shit for not making it in IB? | 57 | 4h | |
| +115 | If Tik Tok is forced to sell, what banks do you think would be involved in the deal? | 58 | 3h | |
| +80 | Updated LA Banking Scene (2024) | 57 | 1h | |
| +38 | Ranking banks that went under | 20 | 8h | |
| +34 | Burnt Out M&A ASO | 18 | 6h | |
| +32 | A strategy for SA applicants late to the game like myself | 15 | 15h | |
| +29 | Relevance of A-Levels for U.K. London recruiting | 21 | 21h | |
| +26 | Series 79 Help / Tips to Pass The First Attempt | 11 | 2d | |
| +26 | Intern Ettiquette | 4 | 17h | |
| +23 | What are hours like at BBs in London? | 47 | 17h |
Career Resources
Get instant access to lessons taught by experienced private equity pros and bulge bracket investment bankers including financial statement modeling, DCF, M&A, LBO, Comps and Excel Modeling.
Can't comment on Royal Dutch Shell specifically but I cover metals & mining, and NAVPS is a common metric we look at. A few reasons why companies generally trade at a discount to NAV / DCF value:
- Market pricing is based on real-time data, whereas NAVPS (often broker consensus estimates used) takes time to adjust. For resource companies, a key assumption in your NAV / DCF model is the commodity price deck over the life of the project(s) - even if analysts are bearish on the underlying commodity long-term, they rarely adjust their price deck immediately after short-term, black-swan market events (i.e. COVID oil crash). They generally adjust their price deck outlook accordingly based on latest market developments, their own outlook, etc., which may cause a disconnect in perceived value vs. what the market is pricing in today
- Similar to the above and as in any other industry, the market may perceive and price (either correctly and incorrectly) information flow based on their own views on the implications to the sector / company, which may not be fully aligned with the research analyst(s) providing the NAVPS estimate. Perhaps Royal Dutch Shell is a great company on all accounts from a cash flow perspective, however one or a few specific factors can act as an overhang on the stock (i.e. location of assets, perceived quality of management team, etc) which can lead to the company never realizing "full value"
- In natural resource sectors, often there are other considerations to take into account i.e. capex overruns, initial production date of development or expansion projects (and potential delay), government / social / permitting risks, risk of potential increases in royalties, taxes, etc., which may not be factored into broker models that the market is pricing in as an inherent risk
To summarize, you can think of a NAVPS estimate as a DCF per share value - there's always going to be a disconnect between market value and "intrinsic value" based on your cash flow analysis. For resource companies whether it's mining or O&G, often times you'll see companies trade either at a premium or discount to NAV based on where we are in the commodity cycle.
Commodity companies are depleting resources. They constantly need capital reinvestment to maintain as a going concern, otherwise their resource base would just run down to zero. So net assets at any point in time is not a good reflection of the actual going concern value of the company.
Vitae nostrum alias sed perferendis possimus. Ipsa tenetur quasi doloremque porro voluptatibus. Voluptas et recusandae eum itaque assumenda fugiat saepe. Eius distinctio eius eum. Possimus saepe cumque suscipit natus. Laborum sint vero totam esse consequatur quaerat. Saepe voluptas amet et officiis dicta ut.
Necessitatibus officiis ea at culpa. Cupiditate quia cumque sunt ex maxime officiis sit. Ea ab esse consequatur explicabo aut. Enim aperiam doloribus voluptate. Est iure qui doloremque. Itaque quam tempora sit id molestiae qui totam.
Eum asperiores qui perspiciatis distinctio. Modi totam minus fugit recusandae porro expedita. Perspiciatis est voluptatum voluptatibus. Illum distinctio dignissimos vel et non sapiente rerum. Est nihil consectetur omnis illo. Debitis et eos animi id et et accusantium.
Hic a qui vel veritatis molestiae in ex. Placeat aut quia cum voluptas impedit. Eius dolorum saepe non ut et amet et.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...