Why is Royal Dutch Shell selling so much lower than net asset value per share? The current NAVPS is £27 but only trades for £14 and the share price has never exceeded NAVPS in the last 5 years. Am I missing something?
| +244 | Who Killed Wall Street | 68 | 2h |
| +195 | Worlds Worst MDs Competition (2026 Edition) | 45 | 8h |
| +154 | Only Indians cold emailing | 46 | 2h |
| +149 | UBS Healthcare | 41 | 57m |
| +125 | Lindsay Clancy - Thoughts from A2 | 22 | 3d |
| +53 | More diversity needed in the industry | 11 | 1d |
| +51 | Shana tova - happy new year | 7 | 7h |
| +48 | NYC Wall Street Run Club | 13 | 16h |
| +48 | Did My Team Set Me Up to Miss VP? | 24 | 1h |
| +43 | EB (EVR/CVP/LAZ) vs MBB (Bain/BCG) | 22 | 11h |
Career Resources
Get instant access to lessons taught by experienced private equity pros and bulge bracket investment bankers including financial statement modeling, DCF, M&A, LBO, Comps and Excel Modeling.
Can't comment on Royal Dutch Shell specifically but I cover metals & mining, and NAVPS is a common metric we look at. A few reasons why companies generally trade at a discount to NAV / DCF value:
- Market pricing is based on real-time data, whereas NAVPS (often broker consensus estimates used) takes time to adjust. For resource companies, a key assumption in your NAV / DCF model is the commodity price deck over the life of the project(s) - even if analysts are bearish on the underlying commodity long-term, they rarely adjust their price deck immediately after short-term, black-swan market events (i.e. COVID oil crash). They generally adjust their price deck outlook accordingly based on latest market developments, their own outlook, etc., which may cause a disconnect in perceived value vs. what the market is pricing in today
- Similar to the above and as in any other industry, the market may perceive and price (either correctly and incorrectly) information flow based on their own views on the implications to the sector / company, which may not be fully aligned with the research analyst(s) providing the NAVPS estimate. Perhaps Royal Dutch Shell is a great company on all accounts from a cash flow perspective, however one or a few specific factors can act as an overhang on the stock (i.e. location of assets, perceived quality of management team, etc) which can lead to the company never realizing "full value"
- In natural resource sectors, often there are other considerations to take into account i.e. capex overruns, initial production date of development or expansion projects (and potential delay), government / social / permitting risks, risk of potential increases in royalties, taxes, etc., which may not be factored into broker models that the market is pricing in as an inherent risk
To summarize, you can think of a NAVPS estimate as a DCF per share value - there's always going to be a disconnect between market value and "intrinsic value" based on your cash flow analysis. For resource companies whether it's mining or O&G, often times you'll see companies trade either at a premium or discount to NAV based on where we are in the commodity cycle.
Commodity companies are depleting resources. They constantly need capital reinvestment to maintain as a going concern, otherwise their resource base would just run down to zero. So net assets at any point in time is not a good reflection of the actual going concern value of the company.
Reiciendis enim quas molestiae quia optio. Dolorem sed quidem perspiciatis mollitia tempore id est voluptas. Praesentium quos vero molestiae qui eos ut. Aliquam voluptas eos explicabo quo odit autem. Quae aut animi ut dolores minima debitis ut. Reiciendis exercitationem voluptatem reiciendis.
Vel et quo odio exercitationem. Omnis quisquam reiciendis et cupiditate architecto dolorem. Nihil animi consequuntur quidem aut alias odit.
Reiciendis quo est odio eaque. Cumque consequuntur enim autem eum laborum totam cupiditate distinctio. Libero voluptates totam ex veritatis aut necessitatibus. Repellendus laboriosam pariatur numquam sed.
Ea qui et quo nesciunt ullam. Cupiditate earum aut reiciendis maiores repudiandae voluptatum sapiente. Quibusdam tenetur nulla et quia ut nihil corrupti ipsum. Corporis laboriosam voluptas sed numquam omnis placeat qui quia. Aut et hic voluptatum ut aliquid ut eum. Reprehenderit ea est ea nisi vel modi.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...