When allocating a purchase price between intangibles/goodwill, do you write up your intangibles based on the purchase price, or the excess purchase price (PP - net tangible assets)?
I've seen examples of both and I'm not sure what is the correct method.. allocating based on your excess purchase price makes sense to me logically, but can someone confirm the correct method?
| +67 | Any tips for sleeping well? | 36 | 12h |
| +52 | Wealthy Parents / Jaded | 17 | 35m |
| +40 | Background check issue IB Full Time | 22 | 1h |
| +36 | Venezuela Debt Restructuring - LAZ vs CVP | 14 | 40m |
| +35 | How are hours rn for SA (interns) | 21 | 8h |
| +28 | Q dealflow slowdown | 22 | 3d |
| +25 | HL vs WB | 19 | 23h |
| +24 | Investment Banking in Mexico | 6 | 9h |
| +23 | UBS GIG, LevFin, FSG Interns working Sundays and 85 hour weeks their first week? | 11 | 23h |
| +22 | MM bottom bucket bonus | 9 | 21h |
Career Resources
Get instant access to lessons taught by experienced private equity pros and bulge bracket investment bankers including financial statement modeling, DCF, M&A, LBO, Comps and Excel Modeling.
http://macabacus.com/accounting/purchase-price-allocation1
not in banking, therefore this may or may not be relevant to what you're asking. we discuss with management the round-about estimate of the tangible values, then our valuation of the intangibles is based on the remainder, so therefore, the excess purchase price. if i'm understanding the first part of your question correctly, it seems as though you would be double counting some value somewhere if you allocate the purchase price to ONLY the intangibles (and assuming there were some tangibles in the deal). we then find fair value of the intangibles, and whatever is the residual is the goodwill or bargain purchase amount. again, not sure how much help this may be, but i noticed no one else was commenting.
not in banking, therefore this may or may not be relevant to what you're asking. we discuss with management the round-about estimate of the tangible values, then our valuation of the intangibles is based on the remainder, so therefore, the excess purchase price. if i'm understanding the first part of your question correctly, it seems as though you would be double counting some value somewhere if you allocate the purchase price to ONLY the intangibles (and assuming there were some tangibles in the deal). we then find fair value of the intangibles, and whatever is the residual is the goodwill or bargain purchase amount. again, not sure how much help this may be, but i noticed no one else was commenting.
Voluptas omnis odio nulla non aut. Voluptatem enim eos dolore.
Tempora exercitationem non necessitatibus et veniam. Soluta ut et temporibus id nostrum. Eveniet omnis dolore maxime in distinctio accusantium. Delectus veritatis fuga qui et voluptatem.
Incidunt fugit nisi quod nam expedita nihil. Praesentium ut alias unde dolores aut. Est aut vel ut dignissimos.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...