Q&A: I'm a London-based Distressed Debt Analyst

I did 1 year at one of the top restructuring shops (BX, HL, Moelis etc) and then moved on to a credit fund. I've been here for 1.5 years and love every minute of it. We've historically focused on the distressed/special sits (control and non-control) space but given the drought of opportunities (in our opinion, some funds would disagree) out there we've expanded our investment mandate and now also look at performing HY/leveraged loans.

I remember when I was still in IB I found it hard to get info on how buyside recruiting/buyside life works in London as most of the info on the internet is American-centric.

If you have any questions about restructuring, credit investing, recruiting etc. feel free to shoot them my way.

 

You looking at Takko?

"After you work on Wall Street it’s a choice, would you rather work at McDonalds or on the sell-side? I would choose McDonalds over the sell-side.” - David Tepper
 

Not me personally but we've been following the situation for a while. we've lost enough money on another fashion retailer this year (i'll let you guess which one that is) so I think we're going to tread carefully on this one. are you?

 
vulture-fund2015:

Not me personally but we've been following the situation for a while. we've lost enough money on another fashion retailer this year (i'll let you guess which one that is) so I think we're going to tread carefully on this one.
are you?

Vivarte? Yea, been following it for a while, no one has got brave and dipped their toe in yet from what we've seen. I hate retail so i can't blame them and given it is a bet on mgmt turning the business around, seeing the CFO walk out because he doesn't want any personal liability associated with a german RXing isn't great.

"After you work on Wall Street it’s a choice, would you rather work at McDonalds or on the sell-side? I would choose McDonalds over the sell-side.” - David Tepper
 

No, on my level I'm the only one with a restructuring background. We certainly like to hire people with RX background but other things (e.g. languages and personality) are more important, and we're a small fund so we need people to tick multiple boxes. Most of my peers were in lev fin and to a lesser extent industry groups at BBs.

Also we tend to hire people with more experience (c. 3-4 years - I got lucky and was sort of an exception) and the good RX people usually get scooped up after 1-2 years.

 

Thanks for doing this:

  1. How would you compare the role of an analyst in your kind of fund (assuming something like Oaktree) v/s a more market related ops like CQS in London? Both types do corporate HY so really interested in finding out real differences.

  2. I spent decent time at a $10bn+ fund researching equities but wasn't going anywhere in terms of deep analysis so accepted another opportunity which has nothing to do with investing but did expose me to the debt side of things. At times I regret leaving the buy-side as people on the street don't recognise my brand anymore. But if I was still with the same firm they'd respond quickly as we were fairly big in euro equities and had that respect. It's stupid.

Some of the sell-side guys I've met so far tell me that to be a desk analyst on the markets side, they prefer someone with experience. I'm surprised that even as entry level sell-side positions they want people with 1 years exp. Why so? I get corp HY is demanding and my equity exp may not be as relevant but anything else you can think of.

Funny thing is, they recommend not going to my previous fund as I will not learn much so kinda of stuck!

 
Best Response

Well I can't really comment on what it's like to work for a fund like CQS. I will say that having a fund with locked up capital makes life a lot easier because you don't have to worry about redemptions and therefore can take a much longer view with regards to your investments. I'm guessing that at more hedgie type funds you're spending a lot of time on next quarter's EBITDA will be above or below guidance and to me that sounds horribly boring/pointless. locked up capital also lets us exploit special opportunities, e.g. when Vivarte went into freefall you saw a ripple effect throughout the European leveraged loan space because CLOs had to indiscriminately sell off assets for no fundamental reasons. we had the capital to step in. distressed investing is all about benefitting from forced sellers and I'm not sure to what extent multi-strat funds can exploit that.

with regards to the second question, I have no idea to be honest. my only guess is that to be a desk analyst they want you to be uptospeed on the market and the lingo. i.e. when I speak to a desk analyst and ask him whether he thinks this credit will have a Phones4U-style outcome I expect him to understand what I'm referring to. for someone who has not been exposed to the HY/distressed scene that might be an issue. again, though, it's difficult for me to understand your position and as a result give you advice.

 
vulture-fund2015:

Well I can't really comment on what it's like to work for a fund like CQS. I will say that having a fund with locked up capital makes life a lot easier because you don't have to worry about redemptions and therefore can take a much longer view with regards to your investments. I'm guessing that at more hedgie type funds you're spending a lot of time on next quarter's EBITDA will be above or below guidance and to me that sounds horribly boring/pointless.
locked up capital also lets us exploit special opportunities, e.g. when Vivarte went into freefall you saw a ripple effect throughout the European leveraged loan space because CLOs had to indiscriminately sell off assets for no fundamental reasons. we had the capital to step in. distressed investing is all about benefitting from forced sellers and I'm not sure to what extent multi-strat funds can exploit that.

with regards to the second question, I have no idea to be honest. my only guess is that to be a desk analyst they want you to be uptospeed on the market and the lingo. i.e. when I speak to a desk analyst and ask him whether he thinks this credit will have a Phones4U-style outcome I expect him to understand what I'm referring to. for someone who has not been exposed to the HY/distressed scene that might be an issue. again, though, it's difficult for me to understand your position and as a result give you advice.

No actually that's a good answer. I've asked my PM the same question and his answer was we do focus constantly on next quarter results (or even next few days) but its mainly to profit from these situations. Investments tend to be long term nonetheless. So we made tons of money on a number of longs over a period of 1.5 years but percentage position/weight in the portfolio changed around earnings which was a good kick for me.

 
vulture-fund2015:
. when I speak to a desk analyst and ask him whether he thinks this credit will have a Phones4U-style outcome I expect him to understand what I'm referring to. for someone who has not been exposed to the HY/distressed scene that might be an issue. again, though, it's difficult for me to understand your position and as a result give you advice.
we should be friends........called a short on phones in may (difficult to get the borrow though)
"After you work on Wall Street it’s a choice, would you rather work at McDonalds or on the sell-side? I would choose McDonalds over the sell-side.” - David Tepper
 

know your deals in and out. make sure you understand the business well. it is important to know the deal dynamics etc. but more important that you understand the business. is it a good business? how do they make money (this seems like the easiest question in the world but you'd be surprised how many interviewees struggle to answer it even though they could name you the formula in cell AF885 of the restructuring model by heart) who are the major customers? what are their margins? what are their competitors' margins? why are they lower/higher?

you can read moyer and graham and buffet but ultimately I think doing well in interviews comes down to (a) showing motivation, (b) being able to talk about your deals and (c) luck and perhaps most importantly fits.

If you have time and motivation consider doing a mock case study (print yourself the OM and the latest annual/interim reports) of a HY issuer of your choice and lock yourself in a room for 4 hours. build a model and articulate whether you would buy the bonds or not. if you have a friend who does the same you can quiz each other.

 

Thanks for doing this OP.

I'm interested in the distressed debt space and wanted to ask for some recommendations on how to jump from a US boutique (think EVR, GHL, PWP, MC) in London to a distressed debt fund. I'm mostly doing M&A but still have some exposure to RX although I'm lagging large "brand-name" RX transactions. Did you contact headhunters, or did they contact you? Any resources (webpages) or headhunters you used in particular? Is it important to network with funds? Is being a native German speaker a plus or are they looking for Spaniards / Italians / Greek / etc.?

Cheers!

 

HH reached out to me but if you work at one of the shops you mentioned you should have no problems getting traction with them even if you reach out to them. Agreed re Hinton. German is definitely a plus - it's always been Spanish, Italian and German in order of preference since I've been in this industry.

@sa-jue. no one expects you to build a full-blown model in 4 hours. do what you can but more importantly have an answer to the question "how would you have done this if you had more time"

 

Did you do your RX analyst gig in London as well? or did you relocate from the states?

If you relo'd, how did you go about? Is it possible for a US analyst (in a seat that sounds surprisingly the same as yours) to get hired in London w/o already being there?

Array
 
vulture-fund2015:

I did 1 year at one of the top restructuring shops (BX, HL, Moelis etc) and then moved on to a credit fund. I've been here for 1.5 years and love every minute of it. We've historically focused on the distressed/special sits (control and non-control) space but given the drought of opportunities (in our opinion, some funds would disagree) out there we've expanded our investment mandate and now also look at performing HY/leveraged loans.

I remember when I was still in IB I found it hard to get info on how buyside recruiting/buyside life works in London as most of the info on the internet is American-centric.

If you have any questions about restructuring, credit investing, recruiting etc. feel free to shoot them my way.

is there anything you would advise someone who is about to Big 4 Audit ACA qualify and wants to switch to Big 4 restructuring? There are a lot of restructuring books but they are USA based, dont know if they are relevant. Do you know if there are restructuring based excel courses you know of?

Would you advise that i focus on making jump to Big 4 restructuring first then try move to IB based restructuring shop like your previous one? Have you seen any examples of that?

Have you worked with Big 4 restructuring shops during your career? Is there any difference between what they do vs Banks? From what I understand its v.different to USA where they are very accounting based.

thanks for any help.

 

Are languages about as important at HFs as they are in banking, or more important?

Banking recruitment at the intern/grad level normally implies "We'll hire you for your brains and fit and if you have languages that is a big plus" but for HFs is it more "We'll hire you for your brains, fit, experience, and languages"?

i.e. I only speak English - how tough will it be if I have brains/fit/experience?

 

It's doable. There will be fewer opportunities as a lot of times a fund is looking to fill a particular language need so you won't get invited to those interviews. However, plenty of times they're just looking for someone smart and a language is nice to have but not essential. it's not something you can change anyways so pointless to worry about. I'm not a native English speaker but my native language is about equally useful as Swahili and I did fine.

 

Thanks for doing this, OP.

Is it possible for people who have HY credit analysis background to get into distressed? I'm currently working at a hy credit fund but we only look at those that are public on the market, I'm more interested in distressed/special situation/non-liquid type of opportunities. I don't have a banking background (started on the buy side), what would you say are the best ways for someone with this background to get into distressed debt?

Thanks!

 

yeah I'm sure that's doable. HY/distressed isn't that different for the most part. maybe read moyer and Whitman to give you an idea what distressed investing is like but be aware that in Europe it's different. I think the best way for you to get into distressed debt is just to reach out to headhunters. out of curiousity though why do you want to do non-liquid type of opportunities? most people I know want to go from illiquid to liquid.

 
vulture-fund2015:

yeah I'm sure that's doable. HY/distressed isn't that different for the most part. maybe read moyer and Whitman to give you an idea what distressed investing is like but be aware that in Europe it's different. I think the best way for you to get into distressed debt is just to reach out to headhunters. out of curiousity though why do you want to do non-liquid type of opportunities? most people I know want to go from illiquid to liquid.

Hi vulture-fund2015: Im interested to go for the non-liquid type opportunities because i think they are more complex, offer more opportunities for in-depth analysis, and their alphas are less dependent on market swing etc... Would you mind sharing why the people you know want to go from illiquid to liquid? is it because there are more liquid HY bonds than illiquid opportunities? Thanks!

 
  1. Have you realized that with the recent and abrupt change in Crude prices that there has been a lack of understanding or knowledge about the energy space? Just based on the fact that there hasn't a real presence of distressed energy companies in recent years.

  2. What's the best advice you can give someone who wants to break into distressed, from an EM/HY/IG role?

Thanks!

 

Many thanks for doing this, appreciate your help. I'm currently a BB analyst at a regional office in southern europe (think FR/IT/SP). Id say ive had above average exposure in terms of complex M&A both in buy sides and sell sides but have 0 experience in debt restructuring. What kind of approach would you recommend if i was thinking of mating with headhunters in 1 year or so?

 

Many thanks for doing this, appreciate your help. I'm currently a BB analyst at a regional office in southern europe (think FR/IT/SP). Id say ive had above average exposure in terms of complex M&A both in buy sides and sell sides but have 0 experience in debt restructuring. What kind of approach would you recommend if i was thinking of mating with headhunters in 1 year or so?

 

Hey there

What readings would you recommend other than Moyer 's Distressed Debt Analaysis and distressed-debt-investing.com website?

In terms of other idea generation, anywhere forums/websites to recommend other than Distressed Debt Investor's club (DDIC) ?

 

Thanks a lot for doing this. Would you mind sharing very ballpark figures of how comps look at different levels of seniority for analysts (not PM) at your fund (or similar - base + bonus). Just trying to understand how comp looks like on the buy-side, not that much info around for Europe. Also, does the level of seniority matter at all or would a 2nd year analyst get the same comp as say 1st year associate when joining?

 
corto maltese:

Thanks a lot for doing this. Would you mind sharing very ballpark figures of how comps look at different levels of seniority for analysts (not PM) at your fund (or similar - base + bonus). Just trying to understand how comp looks like on the buy-side, not that much info around for Europe. Also, does the level of seniority matter at all or would a 2nd year analyst get the same comp as say 1st year associate when joining?

Figured vulturefund may understandably not be so keen to talk about his specific (firm's) comp so thought I'd jump in. At the junior end of things it can vary a lot i.e. basic salary of anything from £55-100k. I would stress, however, that those higher numbers are rare with only two or three places paying that. The average definitely sits around £70k. With regard to bonus what most places do is say that if you work hard and do a good job you will get something around 100% of your base - it's not your job to generate profit for the fund initially, it's to learn, so it's a bit unfair to peg your bonus to fund performance. Going forward you may get a bit of a bump in basic salary now and again but there doesn't tend to be a specific track as in banking, instead it will be your bonus number that will increase if you do well. For example, in your second year you're still really learning but you could get something around 120%, for example. Year three and onwards it very much depends on how good you are and what fund you work for.

Most places will not differentiate between Analyst 2 vs Associate 1, for example; both are seen as junior individuals with no experience of investing so tend to be brought in on the same level. I would say that most funds prefer to avoid making people take a paycut so maybe the Associate would get a fractionally higher base depending on what level they were at and what the fund typically pays incoming analysts. Still, the overwhelming consensus is that one should not be focussed on your first year's comp - it is about the learning opportunity and there is an obvious dislocation in what you can earn in a fund over future years compared with staying in banking anyway. Consequently if someone is making a fuss about wanting their new basic salary to be £5-10k higher than what is offered then they are probably missing the point.

 

Thanks a lot for the answer, will sb when i can. I think I read somewhere that junior bankers were taking paycuts to join credit funds, but 70k is more or less in line with 1st year associate so I guess that's pretty fair. I also agree that early comp doesnt matter too much, but its still nice to know you don't have to take a big paycut to your base salary. How high is the turnover for junior analysts in general? I've heard its pretty brutal at some places like Millenium, was wondering if thats specific to multi-strat funds or if its also similarat credit funds.

 

Which firms are considered leading players in the distressed debt space (in London)? Also, given the popularity of distressed debt investing, do you feel as if the space is growing overly crowded? Heard this is getting increasingly true for illiquid credit.

DYEL
 

Are there any particular writeups or online resources that you would recommend reading for distressed? I'd be particularly interested in a piece that could flesh out the details for events that could occur in a distressed situation and how to in a sense prepare for them.

My boss has a background in distressed and was able to walk me through the details of a pretty onerous exchange offer that we had to go through last year that kind of came out of nowhere, however, I'd like to be able to do it without as much hand holding in future cases. The lawyers working on the docs must be in the office 24/7 to do so many revisions. My previous background was entirely equities, so spending a portion of my time looking at bonds in the 70 - 90 price range has been rather interesting to put it simply.

 

Vero est ea fuga sed est alias nihil magnam. Illum aliquam magnam natus laborum consequuntur. Delectus enim est provident accusamus at.

Expedita maxime ipsam sed consequatur. Nobis ut occaecati quo nisi. Qui temporibus voluptas deserunt quis a.

Career Advancement Opportunities

April 2024 Hedge Fund

  • Point72 98.9%
  • D.E. Shaw 97.9%
  • Citadel Investment Group 96.8%
  • Magnetar Capital 95.8%
  • AQR Capital Management 94.7%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

April 2024 Hedge Fund

  • Magnetar Capital 98.9%
  • D.E. Shaw 97.8%
  • Blackstone Group 96.8%
  • Two Sigma Investments 95.7%
  • Citadel Investment Group 94.6%

Professional Growth Opportunities

April 2024 Hedge Fund

  • AQR Capital Management 99.0%
  • Point72 97.9%
  • D.E. Shaw 96.9%
  • Magnetar Capital 95.8%
  • Citadel Investment Group 94.8%

Total Avg Compensation

April 2024 Hedge Fund

  • Portfolio Manager (9) $1,648
  • Vice President (23) $474
  • Director/MD (12) $423
  • NA (6) $322
  • 3rd+ Year Associate (24) $287
  • Manager (4) $282
  • Engineer/Quant (71) $274
  • 2nd Year Associate (30) $251
  • 1st Year Associate (73) $190
  • Analysts (225) $179
  • Intern/Summer Associate (22) $131
  • Junior Trader (5) $102
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (250) $85
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
3
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
99.0
4
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
5
kanon's picture
kanon
98.9
6
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
7
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
8
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
9
numi's picture
numi
98.8
10
Kenny_Powers_CFA's picture
Kenny_Powers_CFA
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”