Thought Experiment: What if Harvard's 1st Year Class Was Switched With Another School?

I wanted to get your opinion on something. Do you think people from Harvard's MBA program mainly do well because they went to Harvard, or because the type of person who generally gets into HBS is intelligent, driven, etc? For all you students of economics out there, I'm talking about the signaling debate. If all the first year MBA students at HBS had to attend some school ranked 30 or so, and all the first year students at the other school had to attend HBS, do you think the results would be much different 5 or 10 years after graduation?

P.S. In case anyone is interested, I know there was a similar study for undergrad. They compared students who went to Harvard for undergrad, with people who got into Harvard but chose to attend another school. The findings were that the non-Harvard grads did as well as the Harvard grads a few years after graduation.

 

econ - i always wondered about that study; theres a difference in doing well and doing the job you want. for example, im sure many kids in non-targets couldnt get jobs in top BBs/boutiques but went MM and had similar salaries but less exit options, or had to choose their second choice job (medicine/law/and vice versa too) which paid as well but which they didnt really like

 

econ,

The problem is that on-campus recruiting is incredibly different at Harvard than it is at a Top 30 ranked school. HBS has access to all the elite PE/HF/VC jobs that even top schools like Booth / Kellogg / Tuck / Sloan don't see the likes of.

Leaving the practical arguments aside, I do think that the brand does put weight on how two equivalently skilled students are viewed. When I meet HBS students I instantly just "assume" they are smart and am more likely to give them credit for the good things they say and less likely to discredit them for stupid comments.

CompBanker’s Career Guidance Services: https://www.rossettiadvisors.com/
 

The undergrad study is not a good proxy for an MBA degree.

Financially:

Avrg. state school student who studied quant science $$$ > avrg Harvard theology / social policy undergrad's $

Apples to oranges comparison. I am also inclined to believe that the students who turned down Harvard were more interested in quant / science fields, where an undergrad degree is not hugely differentiating.

In other words, major and university's reputation are both variables. Major by major earning differentials are often greater than school by school, at least in the early years.

Among MBA degrees, the only variable is university's reputation.


HBS does not have a monopoly on talent.

 

didnt they already do a study like this with Yale or something? They looked at people who got accepted into Yale but had to go to a lesser school because they couldnt afford it or for some other reason. The avg salary a couple of years out for these people was the same as people who actually attended Yale in the same period.

 
MarginCalling:
dude if not for signaling there is absolutely no reason to do an MBA

In general I agree with you, but in the case of people who did not have undergraduate degrees in business I think an MBA can be really valuable for them. Nurses, engineers, comp sci people, etc all can benefit from an MBA.

 

For those questioning the undergrad study, have you actually looked at it? I haven't, so I don't know, but I wouldn't be surprised if they controlled for some of those things. For example, it would be silly not to control for major.

 

Qui ut sed placeat et rem distinctio et. Quae dolor eveniet tempora quidem. Ad quia quis ipsum sapiente commodi adipisci. Ab explicabo qui at amet. Deserunt architecto quasi ipsa maxime.

Eaque eos blanditiis molestiae reprehenderit qui explicabo tempore. Quis magni et quos repudiandae in iure voluptatem. Ea voluptas praesentium facere qui libero. Et ad laudantium quis nemo veniam necessitatibus sit. Numquam placeat sit ex soluta asperiores fuga.

Aliquam quo doloremque sapiente alias excepturi odio. Hic deserunt quasi et blanditiis ut aut illo. Neque sint hic atque odit.

Career Advancement Opportunities

March 2024 Investment Banking

  • Jefferies & Company 02 99.4%
  • Goldman Sachs 19 98.8%
  • Harris Williams & Co. (++) 98.3%
  • Lazard Freres 02 97.7%
  • JPMorgan Chase 03 97.1%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

March 2024 Investment Banking

  • Harris Williams & Co. 18 99.4%
  • JPMorgan Chase 10 98.8%
  • Lazard Freres 05 98.3%
  • Morgan Stanley 07 97.7%
  • William Blair 03 97.1%

Professional Growth Opportunities

March 2024 Investment Banking

  • Lazard Freres 01 99.4%
  • Jefferies & Company 02 98.8%
  • Goldman Sachs 17 98.3%
  • Moelis & Company 07 97.7%
  • JPMorgan Chase 05 97.1%

Total Avg Compensation

March 2024 Investment Banking

  • Director/MD (5) $648
  • Vice President (19) $385
  • Associates (86) $261
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (13) $181
  • Intern/Summer Associate (33) $170
  • 2nd Year Analyst (66) $168
  • 1st Year Analyst (202) $159
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (144) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
3
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
99.0
4
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
5
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
6
DrApeman's picture
DrApeman
98.9
7
kanon's picture
kanon
98.9
8
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
9
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
10
Jamoldo's picture
Jamoldo
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”