I’m starting to sense the multi strat model is dead.

The bad multi strat firms are losing money. The good ones are too expensive to run and running money like buffet would produce better long term returns. The good ones after how expensive they are to run are generating risks free rate plus 3-4%. In the long run just taking risks premias would be better.

Citadel can’t beat the true quant funds like 2 sigma or rentech . The true trading shops generate far more like drw or jump.

The thing is it’s a great model to attract pension fund money. Low beta which crushed owning the risks free rate.

But now the funds that make money are industry leading quants, people taking factor and idiosyncratic risks with a lot of vol, or do a buffet kind of value.

There’s a reason Goldman Sachs trades at 7-8 pe.

 
slippery:
If you can gather assets and not blow up....that's good enough, right? I think the problem isn't platforms, it's how they do L/S equity. Tough to generate alpha flipping earnings when so many pods are trading the same names. When market unwinds, vol goes up and PMs unwind positions. Sucks - reminds me of converts.

The pods could make money with this model when fundamentals mattered more (2014 and before). I think the biggest change is ETF and quant funds becoming much more prevalent.

The old formula of front running mutual funds by getting more/better data and going long before MF pile in or shorting before MF exit is dead. The guys who follow that formula get into crowded positions and you've seen their faces get ripped off the last 2-3 yrs.

 

I'm not sure quants are doing that great either. For every 2 Sigma, there's an AQR who hasn't been doing so well.

I disagree with you about the platform model. There are mediocre investors that need to leave the industry, it's too big right now. But there will always be a demand for these products, and when we hit a massive downturn, they should show their real value.

 

They all got crushed in the crisis. Millennium down 4%. Citadel 50% though that was a different business model.

It’s a lower beta product for sure. But doesn’t crush the up moves.

Have a feeling they are contributing to a lot of the momentum in the market. Tight risks limits is a big reason why the market never sells 3% without selling 15%.

Agree on the quants. Though it does seem like trading quants are crushing it.

 

Even Two Sigma's performance hasn't been so strong.. Quant CTA strategies are well-populated so it's become more of an asset-gathering operation (as evidenced by the sharp increase in whitepapers/blog posts on their website).

In the case of AQR, the marketing pitch is centered around an appeal to authority (academic finance). For Two Sigma, it's the AI/ML stuff.

 

I think Citadel does this fairly often... It's known to be a very cut-throat shop that is willing to let you go for losing money in a very short period of time. Even in the MO world for commodities, staying for more than 2 years is not very common.

That being said, it's a machine that will pay for performance. I wouldn't view exodus as something uncommon or negative.

 

Veritatis consequatur enim est est culpa est. Illo in at rem est unde dolor veritatis error. Consequatur excepturi cupiditate suscipit id sed totam ut et. Sunt ratione sit voluptas nisi voluptatem. Exercitationem illo possimus enim necessitatibus at. Sit minima fuga consequatur tenetur.

Non quae repudiandae aspernatur sed praesentium est animi. Tenetur distinctio repudiandae mollitia error maxime neque est et. Quia sit enim nihil.

Career Advancement Opportunities

April 2024 Hedge Fund

  • Point72 98.9%
  • D.E. Shaw 97.9%
  • Citadel Investment Group 96.8%
  • Magnetar Capital 95.8%
  • AQR Capital Management 94.7%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

April 2024 Hedge Fund

  • Magnetar Capital 98.9%
  • D.E. Shaw 97.8%
  • Blackstone Group 96.8%
  • Two Sigma Investments 95.7%
  • Citadel Investment Group 94.6%

Professional Growth Opportunities

April 2024 Hedge Fund

  • AQR Capital Management 99.0%
  • Point72 97.9%
  • D.E. Shaw 96.9%
  • Magnetar Capital 95.8%
  • Citadel Investment Group 94.8%

Total Avg Compensation

April 2024 Hedge Fund

  • Portfolio Manager (9) $1,648
  • Vice President (23) $474
  • Director/MD (12) $423
  • NA (6) $322
  • 3rd+ Year Associate (24) $287
  • Manager (4) $282
  • Engineer/Quant (71) $274
  • 2nd Year Associate (30) $251
  • 1st Year Associate (73) $190
  • Analysts (225) $179
  • Intern/Summer Associate (22) $131
  • Junior Trader (5) $102
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (250) $85
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
3
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
4
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
99.0
5
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
6
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
7
kanon's picture
kanon
98.9
8
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
9
Linda Abraham's picture
Linda Abraham
98.8
10
DrApeman's picture
DrApeman
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”