HEDGE FUNDS DIVERSITY STATS - As of December, 2021
This employer diversity data is based solely on user submissions to the WSO Company Database for interviews and employment during 2019, 2020, 2021.
Racial Diversity
Firm
YoY Δ
Percentile
Two Sigma Investments
No
96.9%
D.E. Shaw
No
93.8%
Bridgewater Associates
No
90.6%
Point72
03
87.5%
Citadel Investment Group
No
84.4%
Squarepoint Capital
03
81.3%
Millennium Partners
01
78.1%
Blackstone Group
04
75.0%
Grosvenor Capital Management
03
71.9%
The Tudor Group
No
68.8%
Arena Investors LP
New
65.6%
Ellington Management Group
01
62.5%
Abdiel Capital
22
59.4%
AQR Capital Management
08
56.3%
Magnetar Capital
02
53.1%
Millennium Global
New
50.0%
Balyasny Asset Management
01
46.9%
Worldquant
01
43.8%
Graham Capital Management
02
40.6%
Man Group
No
37.5%
Oak Hill Advisors
08
34.4%
Matrix Capital Management
No
31.3%
Angelo Gordon & Co
08
28.1%
Oaktree Capital Management
06
25.0%
Valiant Capital Management
New
21.9%
Bracebridge Capital
01
18.8%
Anson Funds
01
15.6%
Exoduspoint
New
12.5%
Marshall Wace
New
9.4%
Ruane Cunniff & Goldfarb
New
6.3%
Percentile rank on racial diversity based on how balanced companies are across five primary groups: Caucasian, Asian, African American, Latino/Spanish Origin and Other
Companies with only 10 or more submissions included
The up and down arrows next to each company represent the relative increase or decrease in position compared to the prior year report. The "= =" equal signs means there was no change and the "+ +" plus signs indicate a new company on the statistics.
Female Representation
Firm
YoY Δ
Percentile
Baupost Group (68.6%)
No
97.6%
AQR Capital Management (36.7%)
08
95.1%
Oak Hill Advisors (31.2%)
09
92.7%
Abdiel Capital (30.2%)
24
90.2%
D.E. Shaw (30.2%)
04
87.8%
Bridgewater Associates (27.5%)
02
85.4%
Ruane Cunniff & Goldfarb (22.3%)
New
82.9%
Point72 (21.8%)
03
80.5%
Bracebridge Capital (18.6%)
06
78.0%
Valiant Capital Management (18.6%)
New
75.6%
Blackstone Group (17.3%)
04
73.2%
Matrix Capital Management (14.0%)
02
70.7%
Ellington Management Group (14.0%)
02
68.3%
Balyasny Asset Management (11.1%)
03
65.9%
Millennium Partners (11.1%)
No
63.4%
Man Group (8.6%)
10
61.0%
Citadel Investment Group (6.9%)
01
58.5%
Two Sigma Investments (4.5%)
02
56.1%
Beach Point Capital Management (2.3%)
New
53.7%
Carlson Capital (2.3%)
New
51.2%
Fiera Capital (2.3%)
03
48.8%
xlp capital (2.3%)
02
46.3%
LGT Capital Partners (2.3%)
02
43.9%
Marshall Wace (2.3%)
New
41.5%
Qube Research and Technologies (2.3%)
New
39.0%
JP Global Capital Management (2.3%)
New
36.6%
Millennium Global (2.3%)
New
34.1%
Grosvenor Capital Management (1.9%)
05
31.7%
Och-Ziff Capital Management Group (1.9%)
06
29.3%
Highland Capital Management (1.9%)
09
26.8%
Estimate percentage of females is shown in parenthesis after the company name
Companies with only 10 or more submissions included
The up and down arrows next to each company represent the relative increase or decrease in position compared to the prior year report. The "= =" equal signs means there was no change and the "+ +" plus signs indicate a new company on the statistics.
Athletic Representation
Firm
YoY Δ
Percentile
Beach Point Capital Management (41.8%)
New
97.6%
Och-Ziff Capital Management Group (34.9%)
01
95.1%
Magnetar Capital (24.1%)
05
92.7%
Carlson Capital (21.8%)
New
90.2%
Fiera Capital (21.8%)
No
87.8%
JP Global Capital Management (21.8%)
New
85.4%
Millennium Global (21.8%)
New
82.9%
AQR Capital Management (15.4%)
01
80.5%
Bridgewater Associates (12.9%)
03
78.0%
Balyasny Asset Management (11.0%)
06
75.6%
Two Sigma Investments (10.8%)
No
73.2%
Point72 (9.6%)
03
70.7%
D.E. Shaw (8.7%)
01
68.3%
Citadel Investment Group (6.9%)
04
65.9%
Blackstone Group (6.1%)
01
63.4%
Worldquant (5.7%)
01
61.0%
Squarepoint Capital (4.7%)
10
58.5%
Millennium Partners (2.4%)
No
56.1%
xlp capital (1.8%)
No
53.7%
LGT Capital Partners (1.8%)
03
51.2%
Marshall Wace (1.8%)
New
48.8%
Qube Research and Technologies (1.8%)
New
46.3%
Ruane Cunniff & Goldfarb (1.8%)
New
43.9%
Grosvenor Capital Management (1.5%)
06
41.5%
Highland Capital Management (1.5%)
15
39.0%
Bracebridge Capital (1.5%)
09
36.6%
Baupost Group (1.5%)
09
34.1%
GoldenTree Asset Management (1.5%)
26
31.7%
Valiant Capital Management (1.5%)
New
29.3%
The Tudor Group (1.5%)
01
26.8%
Estimated percentage of varsity athletes is shown in parenthesis after the company name
Companies with only 10 or more submissions included
The up and down arrows next to each company represent the relative increase or decrease in position compared to the prior year report. The "= =" equal signs means there was no change and the "+ +" plus signs indicate a new company on the statistics.
Military Representation
Firm
YoY Δ
Percentile
JP Global Capital Management (20.4%)
New
97.6%
Millennium Global (20.4%)
New
95.1%
Two Sigma Investments (8.6%)
01
92.7%
Bridgewater Associates (3.7%)
03
90.2%
AQR Capital Management (3.1%)
36
87.8%
Point72 (1.8%)
02
85.4%
D.E. Shaw (1.5%)
04
82.9%
Beach Point Capital Management (0.4%)
New
80.5%
Carlson Capital (0.4%)
New
78.0%
Fiera Capital (0.4%)
01
75.6%
xlp capital (0.4%)
06
73.2%
LGT Capital Partners (0.4%)
02
70.7%
Marshall Wace (0.4%)
New
68.3%
Qube Research and Technologies (0.4%)
New
65.9%
Ruane Cunniff & Goldfarb (0.4%)
New
63.4%
Grosvenor Capital Management (0.3%)
03
61.0%
Och-Ziff Capital Management Group (0.3%)
06
58.5%
Highland Capital Management (0.3%)
13
56.1%
Bracebridge Capital (0.3%)
06
53.7%
Baupost Group (0.3%)
06
51.2%
GoldenTree Asset Management (0.3%)
07
48.8%
Valiant Capital Management (0.3%)
New
46.3%
The Tudor Group (0.3%)
05
43.9%
Exoduspoint (0.3%)
17
41.5%
Anson Funds (0.3%)
01
39.0%
Abdiel Capital (0.3%)
14
36.6%
Matrix Capital Management (0.3%)
02
34.1%
Ellington Management Group (0.3%)
04
31.7%
Arena Investors LP (0.3%)
21
29.3%
Oak Hill Advisors (0.2%)
09
26.8%
Estimated percentage of employees with military association is shown in parenthesis after the company name
Companies with only 10 or more submissions included
The up and down arrows next to each company represent the relative increase or decrease in position compared to the prior year report. The "= =" equal signs means there was no change and the "+ +" plus signs indicate a new company on the statistics
Company Specific Salary and Bonus Data Available
Methodology FAQ
How often is this data updated?
The rankings are constantly changing and evolving based on additional data we collect every day. The graphs and tables use the data from YTD and the prior 2 years. See tabs located above on this page to access previous year rankings.
Why do the average compensation numbers look so low?
Remember that the compensation you are accustomed to hearing for top performers in the top groups in New York is well above the average for cities around the world. The compensation average graphs are a global average which includes regional cities and groups that bring the average down. If you would like company and group specific compensation data, please visit the WSO Company Database.
Where does this data come from?
The compensation, review and interview data comes from WSO member submissions to the WSO Company Database. With over 50,000 submissions to date across thousands of companies, the database is solely a representation of what our members were paid and how they rank companies on various metrics. Please see below for a detailed breakdown of the member statistics for those that have contributed to the database.
What are the percentile rankings based on?
The percentile rankings of companies listed here are based on the current YTD and the prior two years of data for companies that received at least one vote. The simple average scores are converted into an Adjusted Score before the companies are ranked to take into account companies with a smaller sample size. This method uses Bayesian Statistics.
Why do you use Bayesian Statistics to adjust scores?
This methodology is used in order to account for standard deviation in rankings. As a company gets more rankings and data, we have more confidence that the average ranking is a true reflection of reality, so this is reflected in the adjusted scores and Percentile rankings. Learn more about Bayesian Statistics here.
Why don't I see company XYZ?
Some great smaller firms may not be represented in the rankings for the simple reason that we have not collected enough data to represent them accurately or for us to have enough data to display them at all.
What is the geographical representation of the submissions?
The WSO user base is very US-centric with approximately 70% of all submissions coming within the United States of America. Please see the detailed breakdown of the member statistics for those that have contributed to the database. For more company and city specific compensation, please visit the WSO Company Database.
or Want to Sign up with your social account?