HEDGE FUNDS DIVERSITY STATS - As of December, 2024

This employer diversity data is based solely on user submissions to the WSO Company Database for interviews and employment during 2022, 2023, 2024.
Racial Diversity
Firm
YoY Δ
Percentile
AQR Capital Management
No
95.5%
Citadel Investment Group
03
90.9%
D.E. Shaw
No
86.4%
Point72
No
81.8%
Millennium Partners
12
77.3%
Bridgewater Associates
04
72.7%
Qube Research and Technologies
01
68.2%
Squarepoint Capital
06
63.6%
Two Sigma Investments
04
59.1%
Man Group
01
54.5%
Oak Hill Advisors
03
50.0%
Worldquant
04
45.5%
Balyasny Asset Management
06
40.9%
Millennium Management
01
36.4%
Exoduspoint
03
31.8%
Abdiel Capital
07
27.3%
Marshall Wace
07
22.7%
G Research
04
18.2%
Magnetar Capital
No
13.6%
Moore Capital Management
New
9.1%
Davidson Kempner Capital Management
04
4.5%
Bayview Asset Management LLC
01
0.0%

Percentile rank on racial diversity based on how balanced companies are across five primary groups: Caucasian, Asian, African American, Latino/Spanish Origin and Other

Companies with only 10 or more submissions included

The up and down arrows next to each company represent the relative increase or decrease in position compared to the prior year report. The "= =" equal signs means there was no change and the "+ +" plus signs indicate a new company on the statistics.

Female Representation
Firm
YoY Δ
Percentile
Bayview Asset Management LLC (45.1%)
No
95.8%
Magnetar Capital (43.2%)
07
91.7%
Bridgewater Associates (28.6%)
04
87.5%
Marshall Wace (27.0%)
02
83.3%
D.E. Shaw (24.7%)
01
79.2%
Man Group (24.0%)
01
75.0%
Farallon Capital Management (23.2%)
New
70.8%
Two Sigma Investments (17.1%)
04
66.7%
Abdiel Capital (16.6%)
06
62.5%
AQR Capital Management (15.8%)
02
58.3%
Balyasny Asset Management (15.8%)
06
54.2%
Point72 (15.5%)
01
50.0%
Citadel Investment Group (12.6%)
01
45.8%
Squarepoint Capital (7.0%)
07
41.7%
AllianceBernstein (3.2%)
New
37.5%
Graham Capital Management (3.2%)
03
33.3%
Moore Capital Management (3.2%)
New
29.2%
G Research (2.7%)
04
25.0%
Millennium Management (1.6%)
03
20.8%
Exoduspoint (1.5%)
06
16.7%
Davidson Kempner Capital Management (1.5%)
03
12.5%
Qube Research and Technologies (0.9%)
03
8.3%
Millennium Partners (0.8%)
05
4.2%
Worldquant (0.8%)
03
0.0%

Estimate percentage of females is shown in parenthesis after the company name

Companies with only 10 or more submissions included

The up and down arrows next to each company represent the relative increase or decrease in position compared to the prior year report. The "= =" equal signs means there was no change and the "+ +" plus signs indicate a new company on the statistics.

Athletic Representation
Firm
YoY Δ
Percentile
Davidson Kempner Capital Management (46.5%)
No
95.8%
Bayview Asset Management LLC (30.2%)
16
91.7%
Bridgewater Associates (25.4%)
01
87.5%
Man Group (23.5%)
01
83.3%
Magnetar Capital (22.3%)
02
79.2%
Moore Capital Management (22.3%)
New
75.0%
Balyasny Asset Management (20.6%)
01
70.8%
Point72 (15.5%)
01
66.7%
Millennium Partners (11.1%)
No
62.5%
Worldquant (5.9%)
No
58.3%
Citadel Investment Group (3.4%)
02
54.2%
Two Sigma Investments (3.1%)
No
50.0%
Graham Capital Management (2.3%)
01
45.8%
AllianceBernstein (2.3%)
New
41.7%
Farallon Capital Management (2.3%)
New
37.5%
G Research (1.9%)
01
33.3%
Abdiel Capital (1.7%)
05
29.2%
Marshall Wace (1.5%)
02
25.0%
Millennium Management (1.2%)
06
20.8%
Exoduspoint (1.1%)
04
16.7%
Qube Research and Technologies (0.7%)
02
12.5%
AQR Capital Management (0.6%)
11
8.3%
Squarepoint Capital (0.4%)
04
4.2%
D.E. Shaw (0.4%)
02
0.0%

Estimated percentage of varsity athletes is shown in parenthesis after the company name

Companies with only 10 or more submissions included

The up and down arrows next to each company represent the relative increase or decrease in position compared to the prior year report. The "= =" equal signs means there was no change and the "+ +" plus signs indicate a new company on the statistics.

Military Representation
Firm
YoY Δ
Percentile
G Research (33.7%)
No
95.8%
Magnetar Capital (0.4%)
11
91.7%
Graham Capital Management (0.4%)
01
87.5%
AllianceBernstein (0.4%)
New
83.3%
Farallon Capital Management (0.4%)
New
79.2%
Moore Capital Management (0.4%)
New
75.0%
Bayview Asset Management LLC (0.3%)
No
70.8%
Abdiel Capital (0.3%)
06
66.7%
Marshall Wace (0.3%)
03
62.5%
Man Group (0.2%)
06
58.3%
Millennium Management (0.2%)
08
54.2%
Exoduspoint (0.2%)
06
50.0%
Davidson Kempner Capital Management (0.2%)
01
45.8%
Qube Research and Technologies (0.1%)
03
41.7%
Millennium Partners (0.1%)
07
37.5%
Worldquant (0.1%)
05
33.3%
AQR Capital Management (0.1%)
15
29.2%
Balyasny Asset Management (0.1%)
02
25.0%
Squarepoint Capital (0.1%)
06
20.8%
Bridgewater Associates (0.1%)
07
16.7%
Citadel Investment Group (0.1%)
05
12.5%
D.E. Shaw (0.1%)
02
8.3%
Two Sigma Investments (0.1%)
No
4.2%
Point72 (0.0%)
21
0.0%

Estimated percentage of employees with military association is shown in parenthesis after the company name

Companies with only 10 or more submissions included

The up and down arrows next to each company represent the relative increase or decrease in position compared to the prior year report. The "= =" equal signs means there was no change and the "+ +" plus signs indicate a new company on the statistics

Company Specific Salary and Bonus Data Available

Methodology FAQ

How often is this data updated?
The rankings are constantly changing and evolving based on additional data we collect every day. The graphs and tables use the data from YTD and the prior 2 years. See tabs located above on this page to access previous year rankings.
Why do the average compensation numbers look so low?
Remember that the compensation you are accustomed to hearing for top performers in the top groups in New York is well above the average for cities around the world. The compensation average graphs are a global average which includes regional cities and groups that bring the average down. If you would like company and group specific compensation data, please visit the WSO Company Database.
Where does this data come from?
The compensation, review and interview data comes from WSO member submissions to the WSO Company Database. With over 50,000 submissions to date across thousands of companies, the database is solely a representation of what our members were paid and how they rank companies on various metrics. Please see below for a detailed breakdown of the member statistics for those that have contributed to the database.
What are the percentile rankings based on?
The percentile rankings of companies listed here are based on the current YTD and the prior two years of data for companies that received at least one vote. The simple average scores are converted into an Adjusted Score before the companies are ranked to take into account companies with a smaller sample size. This method uses Bayesian Statistics.
Why do you use Bayesian Statistics to adjust scores?
This methodology is used in order to account for standard deviation in rankings. As a company gets more rankings and data, we have more confidence that the average ranking is a true reflection of reality, so this is reflected in the adjusted scores and Percentile rankings. Learn more about Bayesian Statistics here.
Why don't I see company XYZ?
Some great smaller firms may not be represented in the rankings for the simple reason that we have not collected enough data to represent them accurately or for us to have enough data to display them at all.
What is the geographical representation of the submissions?
The WSO user base is very US-centric with approximately 70% of all submissions coming within the United States of America. Please see the detailed breakdown of the member statistics for those that have contributed to the database. For more company and city specific compensation, please visit the WSO Company Database.