Historical Report Quick links

2026202520242023202220212020201920182017201620152014201320122011

HEDGE FUNDS DIVERSITY STATS - As of July, 2026

This employer diversity data is based solely on user submissions to the WSO Company Database for interviews and employment during 2024, 2025, YTD 2026.
Racial Diversity
Firm
YoY Δ
Percentile
Two Sigma Investments
03
95.0%
Millennium Partners
01
90.0%
D.E. Shaw
01
85.0%
Squarepoint Capital
04
80.0%
AQR Capital Management
01
75.0%
Citadel Investment Group
03
70.0%
Verition Fund Management
03
65.0%
Point72
01
60.0%
Qube Research and Technologies
04
55.0%
IMC Chicago
01
50.0%
Bridgewater Associates
02
45.0%
Balyasny Asset Management
No
40.0%
Worldquant
No
35.0%
Marshall Wace
No
30.0%
Trexquant
05
25.0%
Davidson Kempner Capital Management
01
20.0%
Baupost Group
01
15.0%
Moore Capital Management
01
10.0%
Millennium Global
New
5.0%
Man Group
04
0.0%

Percentile rank on racial diversity based on how balanced companies are across five primary groups: Caucasian, Asian, African American, Latino/Spanish Origin and Other

Companies with only 10 or more submissions included

The up and down arrows next to each company represent the relative increase or decrease in position compared to the prior year report. The "= =" equal signs means there was no change and the "+ +" plus signs indicate a new company on the statistics.

Female Representation
Firm
YoY Δ
Percentile
AQR Capital Management (34.3%)
03
95.5%
Davidson Kempner Capital Management (30.7%)
No
90.9%
IMC Chicago (30.7%)
No
86.4%
Bridgewater Associates (27.1%)
05
81.8%
D.E. Shaw (24.6%)
01
77.3%
Farallon Capital Management (23.0%)
01
72.7%
Millennium Global (23.0%)
New
68.2%
Trexquant (19.2%)
No
63.6%
Two Sigma Investments (13.7%)
03
59.1%
Balyasny Asset Management (13.1%)
01
54.5%
Citadel Investment Group (10.2%)
03
50.0%
Verition Fund Management (9.6%)
08
45.5%
Point72 (8.3%)
No
40.9%
Squarepoint Capital (7.2%)
01
36.4%
Baupost Group (3.0%)
01
31.8%
BlueCrest Capital Management (3.0%)
01
27.3%
Man Group (3.0%)
07
22.7%
Moore Capital Management (3.0%)
01
18.2%
Marshall Wace (2.1%)
14
13.6%
Millennium Partners (1.9%)
02
9.1%
Worldquant (1.7%)
No
4.5%
Qube Research and Technologies (1.0%)
01
0.0%

Estimate percentage of females is shown in parenthesis after the company name

Companies with only 10 or more submissions included

The up and down arrows next to each company represent the relative increase or decrease in position compared to the prior year report. The "= =" equal signs means there was no change and the "+ +" plus signs indicate a new company on the statistics.

Athletic Representation
Firm
YoY Δ
Percentile
Baupost Group (21.3%)
No
95.5%
Moore Capital Management (21.3%)
No
90.9%
IMC Chicago (15.2%)
02
86.4%
Millennium Partners (13.3%)
03
81.8%
Point72 (12.1%)
01
77.3%
Two Sigma Investments (9.0%)
02
72.7%
Balyasny Asset Management (8.6%)
01
68.2%
Bridgewater Associates (5.6%)
05
63.6%
Citadel Investment Group (5.1%)
No
59.1%
BlueCrest Capital Management (1.3%)
01
54.5%
Farallon Capital Management (1.3%)
01
50.0%
Man Group (1.3%)
03
45.5%
Millennium Global (1.3%)
New
40.9%
Trexquant (1.1%)
01
36.4%
Marshall Wace (0.9%)
03
31.8%
Davidson Kempner Capital Management (0.9%)
No
27.3%
Worldquant (0.7%)
02
22.7%
Verition Fund Management (0.6%)
01
18.2%
AQR Capital Management (0.4%)
01
13.6%
Qube Research and Technologies (0.4%)
01
9.1%
Squarepoint Capital (0.4%)
01
4.5%
D.E. Shaw (0.3%)
01
0.0%

Estimated percentage of varsity athletes is shown in parenthesis after the company name

Companies with only 10 or more submissions included

The up and down arrows next to each company represent the relative increase or decrease in position compared to the prior year report. The "= =" equal signs means there was no change and the "+ +" plus signs indicate a new company on the statistics.

Military Representation
Firm
YoY Δ
Percentile
Balyasny Asset Management (8.4%)
07
95.5%
Bridgewater Associates (5.3%)
No
90.9%
Baupost Group (0.1%)
10
86.4%
BlueCrest Capital Management (0.1%)
11
81.8%
Farallon Capital Management (0.1%)
11
77.3%
Man Group (0.1%)
03
72.7%
Moore Capital Management (0.1%)
15
68.2%
Millennium Global (0.1%)
New
63.6%
Trexquant (0.1%)
12
59.1%
Marshall Wace (0.1%)
07
54.5%
Davidson Kempner Capital Management (0.1%)
06
50.0%
IMC Chicago (0.1%)
08
45.5%
Millennium Partners (0.1%)
06
40.9%
Worldquant (0.1%)
08
36.4%
Verition Fund Management (0.1%)
03
31.8%
AQR Capital Management (0.0%)
04
27.3%
Qube Research and Technologies (0.0%)
13
22.7%
Squarepoint Capital (0.0%)
17
18.2%
Citadel Investment Group (0.0%)
14
13.6%
Two Sigma Investments (0.0%)
09
9.1%
D.E. Shaw (0.0%)
14
4.5%
Point72 (0.0%)
08
0.0%

Estimated percentage of employees with military association is shown in parenthesis after the company name

Companies with only 10 or more submissions included

The up and down arrows next to each company represent the relative increase or decrease in position compared to the prior year report. The "= =" equal signs means there was no change and the "+ +" plus signs indicate a new company on the statistics

Historical Report Quick links

2026202520242023202220212020201920182017201620152014201320122011

Company Specific Salary and Bonus Data Available

Methodology FAQ

How often is this data updated?
The rankings are constantly changing and evolving based on additional data we collect every day. The graphs and tables use the data from YTD and the prior 2 years. See tabs located above on this page to access previous year rankings.
Why do the average compensation numbers look so low?
Remember that the compensation you are accustomed to hearing for top performers in the top groups in New York is well above the average for cities around the world. The compensation average graphs are a global average which includes regional cities and groups that bring the average down. If you would like company and group specific compensation data, please visit the WSO Company Database.
Where does this data come from?
The compensation, review and interview data comes from WSO member submissions to the WSO Company Database. With over 50,000 submissions to date across thousands of companies, the database is solely a representation of what our members were paid and how they rank companies on various metrics. Please see below for a detailed breakdown of the member statistics for those that have contributed to the database.
What are the percentile rankings based on?
The percentile rankings of companies listed here are based on the current YTD and the prior two years of data for companies that received at least one vote. The simple average scores are converted into an Adjusted Score before the companies are ranked to take into account companies with a smaller sample size. This method uses Bayesian Statistics.
Why do you use Bayesian Statistics to adjust scores?
This methodology is used in order to account for standard deviation in rankings. As a company gets more rankings and data, we have more confidence that the average ranking is a true reflection of reality, so this is reflected in the adjusted scores and Percentile rankings. Learn more about Bayesian Statistics here.
Why don't I see company XYZ?
Some great smaller firms may not be represented in the rankings for the simple reason that we have not collected enough data to represent them accurately or for us to have enough data to display them at all.
What is the geographical representation of the submissions?
The WSO user base is very US-centric with approximately 70% of all submissions coming within the United States of America. Please see the detailed breakdown of the member statistics for those that have contributed to the database. For more company and city specific compensation, please visit the WSO Company Database.

Free Hedge Funds Career Resources

Hedge Fund Salary
Hedge Fund Interview Questions
Hedge Fund Resume
Stock Pitch Template
Hedge Fund Internships
Hedge Fund Careers