HEDGE FUNDS DIVERSITY STATS - As of April, 2024

This employer diversity data is based solely on user submissions to the WSO Company Database for interviews and employment during 2022, 2023, YTD 2024.
Racial Diversity
Firm
YoY Δ
Percentile
AQR Capital Management No
No
94.1%
Bridgewater Associates 01
01
88.2%
Point72 01
01
82.4%
Citadel Investment Group 02
02
76.5%
D.E. Shaw 03
03
70.6%
Qube Research and Technologies 01
01
64.7%
Squarepoint Capital 06
06
58.8%
Millennium Management 03
03
52.9%
Exoduspoint 09
09
47.1%
Abdiel Capital 03
03
41.2%
G Research 10
10
35.3%
Man Group 03
03
29.4%
Magnetar Capital 06
06
23.5%
Balyasny Asset Management 02
02
17.6%
Two Sigma Investments No
No
11.8%
Worldquant 01
01
5.9%
Davidson Kempner Capital Management 08
08
0.0%

Percentile rank on racial diversity based on how balanced companies are across five primary groups: Caucasian, Asian, African American, Latino/Spanish Origin and Other

Companies with only 10 or more submissions included

The up and down arrows next to each company represent the relative increase or decrease in position compared to the prior year report. The "= =" equal signs means there was no change and the "+ +" plus signs indicate a new company on the statistics.

Female Representation
Firm
YoY Δ
Percentile
Bayview Asset Management LLC (63.7%)No
No
94.4%
Magnetar Capital (43.7%)05
05
88.9%
D.E. Shaw (36.4%)02
02
83.3%
Bridgewater Associates (23.6%)04
04
77.8%
Two Sigma Investments (22.0%)06
06
72.2%
Abdiel Capital (19.7%)02
02
66.7%
AQR Capital Management (16.8%)01
01
61.1%
Point72 (14.8%)06
06
55.6%
Citadel Investment Group (12.1%)04
04
50.0%
Squarepoint Capital (5.1%)07
07
44.4%
Balyasny Asset Management (3.7%)13
13
38.9%
G Research (3.1%)06
06
33.3%
Man Group (3.1%)01
01
27.8%
Davidson Kempner Capital Management (2.6%)07
07
22.2%
Exoduspoint (1.8%)07
07
16.7%
Qube Research and Technologies (1.7%)09
09
11.1%
Worldquant (1.4%)09
09
5.6%
Millennium Management (1.0%)03
03
0.0%

Estimate percentage of females is shown in parenthesis after the company name

Companies with only 10 or more submissions included

The up and down arrows next to each company represent the relative increase or decrease in position compared to the prior year report. The "= =" equal signs means there was no change and the "+ +" plus signs indicate a new company on the statistics.

Athletic Representation
Firm
YoY Δ
Percentile
Davidson Kempner Capital Management (73.6%)No
No
94.4%
Bridgewater Associates (32.5%)01
01
88.9%
Magnetar Capital (23.0%)01
01
83.3%
Balyasny Asset Management (23.0%)03
03
77.8%
Man Group (19.2%)No
No
72.2%
Point72 (11.9%)No
No
66.7%
Millennium Management (11.3%)02
02
61.1%
Worldquant (8.9%)No
No
55.6%
Citadel Investment Group (6.4%)03
03
50.0%
Two Sigma Investments (6.1%)No
No
44.4%
Bayview Asset Management LLC (3.0%)07
07
38.9%
G Research (2.5%)04
04
33.3%
Abdiel Capital (2.5%)08
08
27.8%
Exoduspoint (1.5%)08
08
22.2%
Qube Research and Technologies (1.4%)09
09
16.7%
AQR Capital Management (1.2%)05
05
11.1%
D.E. Shaw (0.9%)08
08
5.6%
Squarepoint Capital (0.7%)08
08
0.0%

Estimated percentage of varsity athletes is shown in parenthesis after the company name

Companies with only 10 or more submissions included

The up and down arrows next to each company represent the relative increase or decrease in position compared to the prior year report. The "= =" equal signs means there was no change and the "+ +" plus signs indicate a new company on the statistics.

Military Representation
Firm
YoY Δ
Percentile
G Research (33.8%)No
No
94.4%
Bayview Asset Management LLC (0.6%)06
06
88.9%
Magnetar Capital (0.6%)11
11
83.3%
Balyasny Asset Management (0.6%)14
14
77.8%
Man Group (0.5%)08
08
72.2%
Abdiel Capital (0.5%)09
09
66.7%
Davidson Kempner Capital Management (0.4%)05
05
61.1%
Exoduspoint (0.3%)08
08
55.6%
Qube Research and Technologies (0.3%)10
10
50.0%
AQR Capital Management (0.2%)08
08
44.4%
Worldquant (0.2%)09
09
38.9%
D.E. Shaw (0.2%)10
10
33.3%
Citadel Investment Group (0.2%)11
11
27.8%
Millennium Management (0.1%)09
09
22.2%
Two Sigma Investments (0.1%)06
06
16.7%
Bridgewater Associates (0.1%)10
10
11.1%
Squarepoint Capital (0.1%)08
08
5.6%
Point72 (0.1%)15
15
0.0%

Estimated percentage of employees with military association is shown in parenthesis after the company name

Companies with only 10 or more submissions included

The up and down arrows next to each company represent the relative increase or decrease in position compared to the prior year report. The "= =" equal signs means there was no change and the "+ +" plus signs indicate a new company on the statistics

Company Specific Salary and Bonus Data Available

Methodology FAQ

How often is this data updated?
The rankings are constantly changing and evolving based on additional data we collect every day. The graphs and tables use the data from YTD and the prior 2 years. See tabs located above on this page to access previous year rankings.
Why do the average compensation numbers look so low?
Remember that the compensation you are accustomed to hearing for top performers in the top groups in New York is well above the average for cities around the world. The compensation average graphs are a global average which includes regional cities and groups that bring the average down. If you would like company and group specific compensation data, please visit the WSO Company Database.
Where does this data come from?
The compensation, review and interview data comes from WSO member submissions to the WSO Company Database. With over 50,000 submissions to date across thousands of companies, the database is solely a representation of what our members were paid and how they rank companies on various metrics. Please see below for a detailed breakdown of the member statistics for those that have contributed to the database.
What are the percentile rankings based on?
The percentile rankings of companies listed here are based on the current YTD and the prior two years of data for companies that received at least one vote. The simple average scores are converted into an Adjusted Score before the companies are ranked to take into account companies with a smaller sample size. This method uses Bayesian Statistics.
Why do you use Bayesian Statistics to adjust scores?
This methodology is used in order to account for standard deviation in rankings. As a company gets more rankings and data, we have more confidence that the average ranking is a true reflection of reality, so this is reflected in the adjusted scores and Percentile rankings. Learn more about Bayesian Statistics here.
Why don't I see company XYZ?
Some great smaller firms may not be represented in the rankings for the simple reason that we have not collected enough data to represent them accurately or for us to have enough data to display them at all.
What is the geographical representation of the submissions?
The WSO user base is very US-centric with approximately 70% of all submissions coming within the United States of America. Please see the detailed breakdown of the member statistics for those that have contributed to the database. For more company and city specific compensation, please visit the WSO Company Database.