HEDGE FUNDS DIVERSITY STATS - As of December, 2019
This employer diversity data is based solely on user submissions to the WSO Company Database for interviews and employment during 2017, 2018, 2019.
Racial Diversity
Firm
YoY Δ
Percentile
D.E. Shaw
02
97.1%
Two Sigma Investments
01
94.3%
Bridgewater Associates
01
91.4%
AQR Capital Management
No
88.6%
Millennium Partners
01
85.7%
Citadel Investment Group
01
82.9%
The Tudor Group
New
80.0%
Highland Capital Management
01
77.1%
Point72
01
74.3%
Grosvenor Capital Management
New
71.4%
Blackstone Group
04
68.6%
Magnetar Capital
No
65.7%
BlueCrest Capital Management
No
62.9%
Elliott Management Corporation
New
60.0%
GSO Capital Partners
New
57.1%
Worldquant
06
54.3%
Balyasny Asset Management
03
51.4%
Squarepoint Capital
02
48.6%
Man Group
02
45.7%
Oaktree Capital Management
02
42.9%
Graham Capital Management
05
40.0%
Bracebridge Capital
02
37.1%
Foxhill Capital
No
34.3%
Ellington Management Group
03
31.4%
Farallon Capital Management
06
28.6%
Matrix Capital Management
New
25.7%
Davidson Kempner Capital Management
No
22.9%
Ruane Cunniff & Goldfarb
17
20.0%
Anson Funds
New
17.1%
Element Capital Management
01
14.3%
Percentile rank on racial diversity based on how balanced companies are across five primary groups: Caucasian, Asian, African American, Latino/Spanish Origin and Other
Companies with only 10 or more submissions included
The up and down arrows next to each company represent the relative increase or decrease in position compared to the prior year report. The "= =" equal signs means there was no change and the "+ +" plus signs indicate a new company on the statistics.
Female Representation
Firm
YoY Δ
Percentile
MidOcean Partners (42.1%)
No
97.6%
Farallon Capital Management (41.1%)
No
95.1%
Oaktree Capital Management (34.5%)
02
92.7%
Man Group (31.9%)
01
90.2%
Bridgewater Associates (28.5%)
01
87.8%
D.E. Shaw (22.7%)
10
85.4%
Point72 (22.5%)
02
82.9%
AQR Capital Management (18.8%)
09
80.5%
Arena Investors LP (18.4%)
New
78.0%
Davidson Kempner Capital Management (18.4%)
01
75.6%
Bracebridge Capital (17.5%)
04
73.2%
Citadel Investment Group (11.5%)
01
70.7%
Squarepoint Capital (11.1%)
02
68.3%
Ellington Management Group (11.1%)
02
65.9%
Two Sigma Investments (11.0%)
01
63.4%
Graham Capital Management (9.2%)
06
61.0%
Blackstone Group (8.5%)
01
58.5%
Millennium Partners (6.8%)
02
56.1%
Gluskin Sheff (2.1%)
11
53.7%
Baupost Group (2.1%)
04
51.2%
Third Point LLC (2.1%)
New
48.8%
GSO Capital Partners (2.1%)
New
46.3%
Elliott Management Corporation (2.1%)
New
43.9%
BlueCrest Capital Management (2.1%)
03
41.5%
Element Capital Management (2.1%)
03
39.0%
AllianceBernstein (1.8%)
04
36.6%
GoldenTree Asset Management (1.8%)
02
34.1%
Yakira Capital Management (1.8%)
New
31.7%
The Tudor Group (1.8%)
New
29.3%
Bloom Tree Partners (1.8%)
04
26.8%
Estimate percentage of females is shown in parenthesis after the company name
Companies with only 10 or more submissions included
The up and down arrows next to each company represent the relative increase or decrease in position compared to the prior year report. The "= =" equal signs means there was no change and the "+ +" plus signs indicate a new company on the statistics.
Athletic Representation
Firm
YoY Δ
Percentile
GoldenTree Asset Management (68.7%)
01
97.6%
Yakira Capital Management (68.7%)
New
95.1%
Och-Ziff Capital Management Group (29.4%)
04
92.7%
Balyasny Asset Management (23.3%)
02
90.2%
Elliott Management Corporation (22.4%)
New
87.8%
Squarepoint Capital (21.7%)
04
85.4%
Arena Investors LP (18.7%)
New
82.9%
Bracebridge Capital (17.7%)
04
80.5%
Grosvenor Capital Management (14.0%)
New
78.0%
AQR Capital Management (13.8%)
04
75.6%
Magnetar Capital (12.5%)
29
73.2%
Oaktree Capital Management (12.4%)
No
70.7%
Ellington Management Group (11.2%)
02
68.3%
Citadel Investment Group (10.6%)
01
65.9%
Two Sigma Investments (9.6%)
03
63.4%
Bridgewater Associates (8.8%)
03
61.0%
Blackstone Group (8.6%)
09
58.5%
D.E. Shaw (7.2%)
10
56.1%
Point72 (5.7%)
03
53.7%
Worldquant (5.6%)
17
51.2%
Millennium Partners (3.6%)
04
48.8%
Gluskin Sheff (2.4%)
09
46.3%
MidOcean Partners (2.4%)
02
43.9%
Baupost Group (2.4%)
02
41.5%
Third Point LLC (2.4%)
New
39.0%
GSO Capital Partners (2.4%)
New
36.6%
BlueCrest Capital Management (2.4%)
01
34.1%
Element Capital Management (2.4%)
01
31.7%
AllianceBernstein (2.0%)
09
29.3%
Davidson Kempner Capital Management (2.0%)
No
26.8%
Estimated percentage of varsity athletes is shown in parenthesis after the company name
Companies with only 10 or more submissions included
The up and down arrows next to each company represent the relative increase or decrease in position compared to the prior year report. The "= =" equal signs means there was no change and the "+ +" plus signs indicate a new company on the statistics.
Military Representation
Firm
YoY Δ
Percentile
Arena Investors LP (16.8%)
New
97.6%
Two Sigma Investments (6.8%)
01
95.1%
Bridgewater Associates (6.2%)
01
92.7%
Citadel Investment Group (1.8%)
No
90.2%
D.E. Shaw (1.4%)
35
87.8%
Point72 (0.7%)
01
85.4%
Gluskin Sheff (0.2%)
13
82.9%
MidOcean Partners (0.2%)
01
80.5%
Baupost Group (0.2%)
01
78.0%
Third Point LLC (0.2%)
New
75.6%
Elliott Management Corporation (0.2%)
New
73.2%
GSO Capital Partners (0.2%)
New
70.7%
BlueCrest Capital Management (0.2%)
01
68.3%
Element Capital Management (0.2%)
01
65.9%
AllianceBernstein (0.2%)
07
63.4%
GoldenTree Asset Management (0.2%)
03
61.0%
Yakira Capital Management (0.2%)
New
58.5%
Davidson Kempner Capital Management (0.2%)
No
56.1%
The Tudor Group (0.2%)
New
53.7%
Bloom Tree Partners (0.2%)
05
51.2%
SkyBridge Capital II, LLC (0.2%)
05
48.8%
Anson Funds (0.1%)
New
46.3%
Oak Hill Advisors (0.1%)
12
43.9%
Foxhill Capital (0.1%)
03
41.5%
Matrix Capital Management (0.1%)
New
39.0%
Grosvenor Capital Management (0.1%)
New
36.6%
Oaktree Capital Management (0.1%)
04
34.1%
Farallon Capital Management (0.1%)
05
31.7%
Ellington Management Group (0.1%)
01
29.3%
Highland Capital Management (0.1%)
02
26.8%
Estimated percentage of employees with military association is shown in parenthesis after the company name
Companies with only 10 or more submissions included
The up and down arrows next to each company represent the relative increase or decrease in position compared to the prior year report. The "= =" equal signs means there was no change and the "+ +" plus signs indicate a new company on the statistics
Company Specific Salary and Bonus Data Available
Methodology FAQ
How often is this data updated?
The rankings are constantly changing and evolving based on additional data we collect every day. The graphs and tables use the data from YTD and the prior 2 years. See tabs located above on this page to access previous year rankings.
Why do the average compensation numbers look so low?
Remember that the compensation you are accustomed to hearing for top performers in the top groups in New York is well above the average for cities around the world. The compensation average graphs are a global average which includes regional cities and groups that bring the average down. If you would like company and group specific compensation data, please visit the WSO Company Database.
Where does this data come from?
The compensation, review and interview data comes from WSO member submissions to the WSO Company Database. With over 50,000 submissions to date across thousands of companies, the database is solely a representation of what our members were paid and how they rank companies on various metrics. Please see below for a detailed breakdown of the member statistics for those that have contributed to the database.
What are the percentile rankings based on?
The percentile rankings of companies listed here are based on the current YTD and the prior two years of data for companies that received at least one vote. The simple average scores are converted into an Adjusted Score before the companies are ranked to take into account companies with a smaller sample size. This method uses Bayesian Statistics.
Why do you use Bayesian Statistics to adjust scores?
This methodology is used in order to account for standard deviation in rankings. As a company gets more rankings and data, we have more confidence that the average ranking is a true reflection of reality, so this is reflected in the adjusted scores and Percentile rankings. Learn more about Bayesian Statistics here.
Why don't I see company XYZ?
Some great smaller firms may not be represented in the rankings for the simple reason that we have not collected enough data to represent them accurately or for us to have enough data to display them at all.
What is the geographical representation of the submissions?
The WSO user base is very US-centric with approximately 70% of all submissions coming within the United States of America. Please see the detailed breakdown of the member statistics for those that have contributed to the database. For more company and city specific compensation, please visit the WSO Company Database.
or Want to Sign up with your social account?