HEDGE FUNDS DIVERSITY STATS - As of December, 2023

This employer diversity data is based solely on user submissions to the WSO Company Database for interviews and employment during 2021, 2022, 2023.
Racial Diversity
Firm
YoY Δ
Percentile
AQR Capital Management
No
95.8%
Bridgewater Associates
No
91.7%
D.E. Shaw
No
87.5%
Point72
01
83.3%
Citadel Investment Group
01
79.2%
Qube Research and Technologies
09
75.0%
Balyasny Asset Management
06
70.8%
Oak Hill Advisors
20
66.7%
Abdiel Capital
No
62.5%
Ruane Cunniff & Goldfarb
14
58.3%
Man Group
01
54.2%
Two Sigma Investments
08
50.0%
Blackstone Group
03
45.8%
Squarepoint Capital
07
41.7%
Millennium Partners
04
37.5%
Worldquant
01
33.3%
Exoduspoint
01
29.2%
Magnetar Capital
08
25.0%
Valiant Capital Management
02
20.8%
Arena Investors LP
12
16.7%
G Research
New
12.5%
Bayview Asset Management LLC
04
8.3%
Marshall Wace
New
4.2%
Davidson Kempner Capital Management
03
0.0%

Percentile rank on racial diversity based on how balanced companies are across five primary groups: Caucasian, Asian, African American, Latino/Spanish Origin and Other

Companies with only 10 or more submissions included

The up and down arrows next to each company represent the relative increase or decrease in position compared to the prior year report. The "= =" equal signs means there was no change and the "+ +" plus signs indicate a new company on the statistics.

Female Representation
Firm
YoY Δ
Percentile
Bayview Asset Management LLC (70.0%)
01
96.2%
Marshall Wace (36.7%)
New
92.3%
Abdiel Capital (35.6%)
01
88.5%
D.E. Shaw (33.9%)
01
84.6%
Man Group (32.0%)
08
80.8%
Oak Hill Advisors (31.4%)
03
76.9%
Bridgewater Associates (24.9%)
01
73.1%
AQR Capital Management (24.8%)
No
69.2%
Magnetar Capital (24.5%)
09
65.4%
Valiant Capital Management (20.0%)
01
61.5%
Ruane Cunniff & Goldfarb (20.0%)
01
57.7%
Blackstone Group (18.3%)
05
53.8%
Two Sigma Investments (16.8%)
03
50.0%
Point72 (16.5%)
02
46.2%
Citadel Investment Group (14.9%)
No
42.3%
Millennium Partners (7.3%)
01
38.5%
Balyasny Asset Management (6.7%)
03
34.6%
Graham Capital Management (4.0%)
09
30.8%
Arena Investors LP (4.0%)
07
26.9%
Squarepoint Capital (3.6%)
01
23.1%
G Research (3.3%)
02
19.2%
Oaktree Capital Management (3.3%)
09
15.4%
Davidson Kempner Capital Management (2.5%)
06
11.5%
Qube Research and Technologies (1.5%)
04
7.7%
Exoduspoint (1.5%)
07
3.8%
Worldquant (1.1%)
07
0.0%

Estimate percentage of females is shown in parenthesis after the company name

Companies with only 10 or more submissions included

The up and down arrows next to each company represent the relative increase or decrease in position compared to the prior year report. The "= =" equal signs means there was no change and the "+ +" plus signs indicate a new company on the statistics.

Athletic Representation
Firm
YoY Δ
Percentile
Davidson Kempner Capital Management (63.7%)
No
96.2%
Bridgewater Associates (30.0%)
02
92.3%
Magnetar Capital (23.3%)
01
88.5%
Man Group (21.0%)
01
84.6%
Blackstone Group (17.5%)
04
80.8%
Oak Hill Advisors (15.7%)
No
76.9%
Point72 (15.0%)
No
73.1%
Balyasny Asset Management (11.7%)
No
69.2%
Worldquant (5.8%)
01
65.4%
Millennium Partners (4.8%)
01
61.5%
AQR Capital Management (3.8%)
03
57.7%
Two Sigma Investments (3.5%)
03
53.8%
Citadel Investment Group (3.1%)
01
50.0%
Graham Capital Management (2.0%)
13
46.2%
Arena Investors LP (2.0%)
10
42.3%
Marshall Wace (1.6%)
New
38.5%
G Research (1.6%)
03
34.6%
Bayview Asset Management LLC (1.6%)
06
30.8%
Oaktree Capital Management (1.6%)
11
26.9%
Valiant Capital Management (1.6%)
06
23.1%
Ruane Cunniff & Goldfarb (1.6%)
No
19.2%
Abdiel Capital (1.1%)
09
15.4%
Qube Research and Technologies (0.8%)
05
11.5%
Exoduspoint (0.8%)
08
7.7%
D.E. Shaw (0.3%)
12
3.8%
Squarepoint Capital (0.3%)
07
0.0%

Estimated percentage of varsity athletes is shown in parenthesis after the company name

Companies with only 10 or more submissions included

The up and down arrows next to each company represent the relative increase or decrease in position compared to the prior year report. The "= =" equal signs means there was no change and the "+ +" plus signs indicate a new company on the statistics.

Military Representation
Firm
YoY Δ
Percentile
G Research (33.7%)
No
96.2%
AQR Capital Management (3.5%)
01
92.3%
Point72 (1.4%)
01
88.5%
Graham Capital Management (0.4%)
11
84.6%
Arena Investors LP (0.4%)
08
80.8%
Marshall Wace (0.4%)
New
76.9%
Bayview Asset Management LLC (0.4%)
05
73.1%
Oaktree Capital Management (0.4%)
12
69.2%
Valiant Capital Management (0.4%)
05
65.4%
Ruane Cunniff & Goldfarb (0.4%)
01
61.5%
Oak Hill Advisors (0.3%)
06
57.7%
Davidson Kempner Capital Management (0.3%)
06
53.8%
Magnetar Capital (0.2%)
11
50.0%
Abdiel Capital (0.2%)
07
46.2%
Man Group (0.2%)
07
42.3%
Blackstone Group (0.2%)
10
38.5%
Qube Research and Technologies (0.2%)
01
34.6%
Exoduspoint (0.2%)
05
30.8%
Balyasny Asset Management (0.1%)
06
26.9%
Worldquant (0.1%)
07
23.1%
Two Sigma Investments (0.1%)
09
19.2%
D.E. Shaw (0.1%)
10
15.4%
Squarepoint Capital (0.1%)
05
11.5%
Citadel Investment Group (0.1%)
05
7.7%
Bridgewater Associates (0.1%)
06
3.8%
Millennium Partners (0.0%)
07
0.0%

Estimated percentage of employees with military association is shown in parenthesis after the company name

Companies with only 10 or more submissions included

The up and down arrows next to each company represent the relative increase or decrease in position compared to the prior year report. The "= =" equal signs means there was no change and the "+ +" plus signs indicate a new company on the statistics

Company Specific Salary and Bonus Data Available

Methodology FAQ

How often is this data updated?
The rankings are constantly changing and evolving based on additional data we collect every day. The graphs and tables use the data from YTD and the prior 2 years. See tabs located above on this page to access previous year rankings.
Why do the average compensation numbers look so low?
Remember that the compensation you are accustomed to hearing for top performers in the top groups in New York is well above the average for cities around the world. The compensation average graphs are a global average which includes regional cities and groups that bring the average down. If you would like company and group specific compensation data, please visit the WSO Company Database.
Where does this data come from?
The compensation, review and interview data comes from WSO member submissions to the WSO Company Database. With over 50,000 submissions to date across thousands of companies, the database is solely a representation of what our members were paid and how they rank companies on various metrics. Please see below for a detailed breakdown of the member statistics for those that have contributed to the database.
What are the percentile rankings based on?
The percentile rankings of companies listed here are based on the current YTD and the prior two years of data for companies that received at least one vote. The simple average scores are converted into an Adjusted Score before the companies are ranked to take into account companies with a smaller sample size. This method uses Bayesian Statistics.
Why do you use Bayesian Statistics to adjust scores?
This methodology is used in order to account for standard deviation in rankings. As a company gets more rankings and data, we have more confidence that the average ranking is a true reflection of reality, so this is reflected in the adjusted scores and Percentile rankings. Learn more about Bayesian Statistics here.
Why don't I see company XYZ?
Some great smaller firms may not be represented in the rankings for the simple reason that we have not collected enough data to represent them accurately or for us to have enough data to display them at all.
What is the geographical representation of the submissions?
The WSO user base is very US-centric with approximately 70% of all submissions coming within the United States of America. Please see the detailed breakdown of the member statistics for those that have contributed to the database. For more company and city specific compensation, please visit the WSO Company Database.