PRIVATE EQUITY DIVERSITY STATS - As of December, 2018
This employer diversity data is based solely on user submissions to the WSO Company Database for interviews and employment during 2016, 2017, 2018.
Racial Diversity
Firm
YoY Δ
Percentile
Bain Capital
03
98.9%
Warburg Pincus
03
97.9%
Alpine Investors
01
96.8%
Alinda Capital Partners
New
95.7%
The Riverside Company
15
94.7%
KKR (Kohlberg Kravis Roberts)
17
93.6%
Hamilton Lane
09
92.6%
The Abraaj Group
05
91.5%
Vista Equity Partners
01
90.4%
TPG Global
26
89.4%
Blackstone Group
01
88.3%
H.I.G. Capital
06
87.2%
Silver Lake
02
86.2%
Charlesbank Capital Partners
23
85.1%
The Carlyle Group
18
84.0%
3i
14
83.0%
Pantheon Ventures
05
81.9%
Carlyle Group
11
80.9%
LGT Capital Partners
10
79.8%
OMERS
08
78.7%
Onex
02
77.7%
JMI Equity
08
76.6%
Search Fund Accelerator
08
75.5%
Partners Group
03
74.5%
Turtle Holdings
New
73.4%
Bregal Sagemount
New
72.3%
Apollo Global Management
21
71.3%
Cerberus Capital Management
New
70.2%
Audax Group
07
69.1%
GPB Capital Holdings LLC
New
68.1%
Percentile rank on racial diversity based on how balanced companies are across five primary groups: Caucasian, Asian, African American, Latino/Spanish Origin and Other
Companies with only 10 or more submissions included
The up and down arrows next to each company represent the relative increase or decrease in position compared to the prior year report. The "= =" equal signs means there was no change and the "+ +" plus signs indicate a new company on the statistics.
Female Representation
Firm
YoY Δ
Percentile
Blue Sage Capital (76.6%)
No
99.0%
Golden Gate Capital (68.8%)
New
98.1%
Ethika Investments, LLC (62.6%)
01
97.1%
American Securities (52.1%)
New
96.2%
Insight Venture Partners (42.6%)
New
95.2%
Fosun (37.5%)
No
94.2%
Cerberus Capital Management (35.6%)
37
93.3%
Siguler Guff (35.5%)
05
92.3%
Grosvenor Capital Management (34.4%)
33
91.3%
Roark Capital Group (30.4%)
New
90.4%
JMI Equity (29.5%)
04
89.4%
CITIC Capital (28.4%)
09
88.5%
Hamilton Lane (27.5%)
02
87.5%
Accel-KKR (26.1%)
02
86.5%
Brown Brothers Harriman (24.1%)
10
85.6%
Alpine Investors (23.7%)
04
84.6%
Warburg Pincus (23.0%)
09
83.7%
Generational Transfer Entrepreneurs (22.6%)
New
82.7%
Sofina (22.6%)
16
81.7%
Alcazar Capital (22.6%)
New
80.8%
The Riverside Company (22.3%)
03
79.8%
The Abraaj Group (19.6%)
04
78.8%
Landmark Partners (19.4%)
New
77.9%
Alinda Capital Partners (18.8%)
New
76.9%
Blackstone Group (18.5%)
15
76.0%
Graham Partners (17.7%)
22
75.0%
Starwood Capital Group (17.4%)
13
74.0%
TPG Global (16.5%)
37
73.1%
Advent International Corporation (16.4%)
18
72.1%
Susquehanna Growth Equity (16.1%)
No
71.2%
Estimate percentage of females is shown in parenthesis after the company name
Companies with only 10 or more submissions included
The up and down arrows next to each company represent the relative increase or decrease in position compared to the prior year report. The "= =" equal signs means there was no change and the "+ +" plus signs indicate a new company on the statistics.
Athletic Representation
Firm
YoY Δ
Percentile
Blue Sage Capital (76.7%)
No
99.0%
Bostonian Capital Management Company (62.8%)
No
98.1%
Aquiline Capital Partners (51.7%)
New
97.1%
Tailwind Capital (42.8%)
01
96.2%
Colony Capital LLC (42.8%)
New
95.2%
Quantum Energy Partners (42.8%)
New
94.2%
K1 Investment Management (35.7%)
New
93.3%
AlpInvest Partners (35.7%)
New
92.3%
AUA Private Equity Partners, LLC (35.7%)
02
91.3%
Audax Group (33.9%)
06
90.4%
Brown Brothers Harriman (31.8%)
02
89.4%
Novacap (30.6%)
New
88.5%
Fosun (28.5%)
03
87.5%
Bain Capital (24.7%)
08
86.5%
Lone Star Funds (24.2%)
03
85.6%
Alpine Investors (23.8%)
10
84.6%
The Carlyle Group (23.8%)
33
83.7%
Pretium Partners LLC (22.8%)
New
82.7%
Norwest Equity Partners (22.8%)
New
81.7%
Middle Market PE Fund (22.8%)
New
80.8%
Ardian (21.8%)
41
79.8%
Landmark Partners (19.5%)
New
78.8%
EQT Partners (19.0%)
New
77.9%
Accel-KKR (17.8%)
31
76.9%
HarbourVest (17.8%)
26
76.0%
TPG Global (16.6%)
09
75.0%
Search Fund Accelerator (16.5%)
16
74.0%
Advent International Corporation (16.5%)
20
73.1%
The Family Office (16.3%)
New
72.1%
General Atlantic (16.3%)
01
71.2%
Estimated percentage of varsity athletes is shown in parenthesis after the company name
Companies with only 10 or more submissions included
The up and down arrows next to each company represent the relative increase or decrease in position compared to the prior year report. The "= =" equal signs means there was no change and the "+ +" plus signs indicate a new company on the statistics.
Military Representation
Firm
YoY Δ
Percentile
HarbourVest (50.1%)
No
99.0%
Triangle Capital Corporation (20.3%)
New
98.1%
Marlin Equity (20.3%)
New
97.1%
KKR (Kohlberg Kravis Roberts) (5.8%)
53
96.2%
Bain Capital (2.7%)
61
95.2%
Partners Group (2.5%)
57
94.2%
Blackstone Group (2.3%)
60
93.3%
Chatham Capital (0.3%)
06
92.3%
JLL Partners (0.3%)
New
91.3%
Tailwind Capital (0.3%)
06
90.4%
Generational Transfer Entrepreneurs (0.3%)
New
89.4%
Pretium Partners LLC (0.3%)
New
88.5%
Insight Venture Partners (0.3%)
New
87.5%
LLR Partners (0.3%)
New
86.5%
Victory Park Capital (0.3%)
New
85.6%
Colony Capital LLC (0.3%)
New
84.6%
Aurelius (0.3%)
New
83.7%
Rosewood Private Investments (0.3%)
11
82.7%
Norwest Equity Partners (0.3%)
New
81.7%
Turtle Holdings (0.3%)
New
80.8%
Peak Rock Capital (0.3%)
New
79.8%
Bregal Sagemount (0.3%)
New
78.8%
Sofina (0.3%)
14
77.9%
Middle Market PE Fund (0.3%)
New
76.9%
Bostonian Capital Management Company (0.3%)
13
76.0%
Lee Equity Partners (0.3%)
New
75.0%
Partner One Capital (0.3%)
New
74.0%
Oman Investment Fund (0.3%)
14
73.1%
Sverica International (0.3%)
New
72.1%
Actera Group (0.3%)
19
71.2%
Estimated percentage of employees with military association is shown in parenthesis after the company name
Companies with only 10 or more submissions included
The up and down arrows next to each company represent the relative increase or decrease in position compared to the prior year report. The "= =" equal signs means there was no change and the "+ +" plus signs indicate a new company on the statistics
Company Specific Salary and Bonus Data Available
Methodology FAQ
How often is this data updated?
The rankings are constantly changing and evolving based on additional data we collect every day. The graphs and tables use the data from YTD and the prior 2 years. See tabs located above on this page to access previous year rankings.
Why do the average compensation numbers look so low?
Remember that the compensation you are accustomed to hearing for top performers in the top groups in New York is well above the average for cities around the world. The compensation average graphs are a global average which includes regional cities and groups that bring the average down. If you would like company and group specific compensation data, please visit the WSO Company Database.
Where does this data come from?
The compensation, review and interview data comes from WSO member submissions to the WSO Company Database. With over 50,000 submissions to date across thousands of companies, the database is solely a representation of what our members were paid and how they rank companies on various metrics. Please see below for a detailed breakdown of the member statistics for those that have contributed to the database.
What are the percentile rankings based on?
The percentile rankings of companies listed here are based on the current YTD and the prior two years of data for companies that received at least one vote. The simple average scores are converted into an Adjusted Score before the companies are ranked to take into account companies with a smaller sample size. This method uses Bayesian Statistics.
Why do you use Bayesian Statistics to adjust scores?
This methodology is used in order to account for standard deviation in rankings. As a company gets more rankings and data, we have more confidence that the average ranking is a true reflection of reality, so this is reflected in the adjusted scores and Percentile rankings. Learn more about Bayesian Statistics here.
Why don't I see company XYZ?
Some great smaller firms may not be represented in the rankings for the simple reason that we have not collected enough data to represent them accurately or for us to have enough data to display them at all.
What is the geographical representation of the submissions?
The WSO user base is very US-centric with approximately 70% of all submissions coming within the United States of America. Please see the detailed breakdown of the member statistics for those that have contributed to the database. For more company and city specific compensation, please visit the WSO Company Database.
or Want to Sign up with your social account?