PRIVATE EQUITY DIVERSITY STATS - As of June, 2026
This employer diversity data is based solely on user submissions to the WSO Company Database for interviews and employment during 2024, 2025, YTD 2026.
Racial Diversity
Firm
YoY Δ
Percentile
Audax Group
01
97.7%
Ardian
01
95.5%
Accel-KKR
No
93.2%
HarbourVest
01
90.9%
KKR (Kohlberg Kravis Roberts)
02
88.6%
Blackstone Group
No
86.4%
H.I.G. Capital
02
84.1%
Graham Partners
05
81.8%
Roark Capital Group
24
79.5%
HarbourVest Partners
12
77.3%
Alpine Investors
20
75.0%
Bain Capital
01
72.7%
Star Mountain Capital
03
70.5%
Aldrich Capital Partners
07
68.2%
Carlyle Group
03
65.9%
Odyssey Investment Partners
07
63.6%
Vista Equity Partners
13
61.4%
Susquehanna Growth Equity
07
59.1%
Whitehorse Liquidity Partners
New
56.8%
Koch Equity Development
22
54.5%
Actis
05
52.3%
Tikehau Capital
New
50.0%
Insight Partners
04
47.7%
Partners Group
12
45.5%
Hamilton Lane
10
43.2%
I Squared Capital
06
40.9%
Incline Equity Partners
03
38.6%
OMERS
12
36.4%
K1 Investment Management
15
34.1%
DW Healthcare Partners
15
31.8%
Percentile rank on racial diversity based on how balanced companies are across five primary groups: Caucasian, Asian, African American, Latino/Spanish Origin and Other
Companies with only 10 or more submissions included
The up and down arrows next to each company represent the relative increase or decrease in position compared to the prior year report. The "= =" equal signs means there was no change and the "+ +" plus signs indicate a new company on the statistics.
Female Representation
Firm
YoY Δ
Percentile
Cinven (64.8%)
05
98.2%
Centerbridge Partners (64.8%)
01
96.5%
Partners Group (56.7%)
10
94.7%
Audax Group (52.0%)
19
93.0%
Livingbridge (44.8%)
03
91.2%
NextGen Growth Partners (44.8%)
04
89.5%
CriticalPoint Capital (44.8%)
02
87.7%
Trive Capital (44.8%)
02
86.0%
Shore Capital Partners (44.8%)
20
84.2%
GCM Grosvenor (44.8%)
01
82.5%
Ardian (42.6%)
08
80.7%
Hamilton Lane (41.6%)
05
78.9%
Graham Partners (37.4%)
01
77.2%
Apollo Global Management (37.4%)
10
75.4%
Alpine Investors (37.4%)
19
73.7%
Odyssey Investment Partners (37.4%)
No
71.9%
I Squared Capital (36.0%)
No
70.2%
Astorg Partners (32.0%)
04
68.4%
Accel-KKR (32.0%)
06
66.7%
Carlyle Group (28.0%)
15
64.9%
Vista Equity Partners (24.8%)
01
63.2%
TPG Global (23.2%)
22
61.4%
KKR (Kohlberg Kravis Roberts) (21.2%)
14
59.6%
Aldrich Capital Partners (20.7%)
14
57.9%
Warburg Pincus (20.7%)
22
56.1%
Roark Capital Group (20.7%)
17
54.4%
Blackstone Group (20.2%)
09
52.6%
OMERS (15.5%)
17
50.9%
Bain Capital (15.5%)
05
49.1%
The Riverside Company (4.8%)
18
47.4%
Estimate percentage of females is shown in parenthesis after the company name
Companies with only 10 or more submissions included
The up and down arrows next to each company represent the relative increase or decrease in position compared to the prior year report. The "= =" equal signs means there was no change and the "+ +" plus signs indicate a new company on the statistics.
Athletic Representation
Firm
YoY Δ
Percentile
Lone Star Funds (63.2%)
No
98.2%
Creador (45.1%)
No
96.5%
Starwood Capital Group (43.2%)
09
94.7%
Carlyle Group (39.5%)
02
93.0%
Aldrich Capital Partners (36.0%)
02
91.2%
Sweetwater Private Equity (36.0%)
02
89.5%
Novacap (36.0%)
26
87.7%
Warburg Pincus (36.0%)
12
86.0%
Providence Strategic Growth (30.8%)
No
84.2%
K1 Investment Management (30.8%)
01
82.5%
HarbourVest Partners (24.0%)
01
80.7%
NextGen Growth Partners (23.2%)
16
78.9%
Trive Capital (23.2%)
02
77.2%
TPG Global (22.6%)
05
75.4%
Blackstone Group (19.8%)
12
73.7%
Apollo Global Management (19.3%)
13
71.9%
Tikehau Capital (19.3%)
New
70.2%
Alpine Investors (19.3%)
05
68.4%
Roark Capital Group (19.3%)
06
66.7%
Accel-KKR (16.5%)
11
64.9%
Incline Equity Partners (16.5%)
11
63.2%
H.I.G. Capital (14.5%)
15
61.4%
Hamilton Lane (14.4%)
03
59.6%
Partners Group (10.5%)
18
57.9%
Audax Group (9.7%)
13
56.1%
Ardian (6.8%)
14
54.4%
KKR (Kohlberg Kravis Roberts) (5.8%)
12
52.6%
The Riverside Company (3.2%)
05
50.9%
Cinven (3.2%)
22
49.1%
Livingbridge (3.2%)
16
47.4%
Estimated percentage of varsity athletes is shown in parenthesis after the company name
Companies with only 10 or more submissions included
The up and down arrows next to each company represent the relative increase or decrease in position compared to the prior year report. The "= =" equal signs means there was no change and the "+ +" plus signs indicate a new company on the statistics.
Military Representation
Firm
YoY Δ
Percentile
Starwood Capital Group (40.3%)
01
98.2%
HarbourVest Partners (11.3%)
03
96.5%
Blackstone Group (9.6%)
05
94.7%
Ardian (6.0%)
03
93.0%
The Riverside Company (0.3%)
61
91.2%
Cinven (0.3%)
38
89.5%
Livingbridge (0.3%)
05
87.7%
Lone Star Funds (0.3%)
05
86.0%
NextGen Growth Partners (0.3%)
43
84.2%
CriticalPoint Capital (0.3%)
05
82.5%
CIM Group (0.3%)
05
80.7%
BlackFin Capital Partners (0.3%)
05
78.9%
Advent International Corporation (0.3%)
07
77.2%
Trivest Partners (0.3%)
22
75.4%
Star Mountain Capital (0.3%)
22
73.7%
Monomoy Capital Partners (0.3%)
22
71.9%
Trive Capital (0.3%)
01
70.2%
Flexpoint Ford (0.3%)
01
68.4%
Shore Capital Partners (0.3%)
01
66.7%
Centerbridge Partners (0.3%)
19
64.9%
Constellation Software Inc (0.3%)
New
63.2%
Campbell Lutyens (0.3%)
20
61.4%
Vista Equity Partners (0.3%)
40
59.6%
GCM Grosvenor (0.3%)
01
57.9%
DW Healthcare Partners (0.3%)
01
56.1%
Aldrich Capital Partners (0.3%)
03
54.4%
Sweetwater Private Equity (0.3%)
04
52.6%
Novacap (0.3%)
42
50.9%
Altas Partners (0.3%)
15
49.1%
Blueprint Equity (0.3%)
03
47.4%
Estimated percentage of employees with military association is shown in parenthesis after the company name
Companies with only 10 or more submissions included
The up and down arrows next to each company represent the relative increase or decrease in position compared to the prior year report. The "= =" equal signs means there was no change and the "+ +" plus signs indicate a new company on the statistics
Company Specific Salary and Bonus Data Available
Methodology FAQ
How often is this data updated?
The rankings are constantly changing and evolving based on additional data we collect every day. The graphs and tables use the data from YTD and the prior 2 years. See tabs located above on this page to access previous year rankings.
Why do the average compensation numbers look so low?
Remember that the compensation you are accustomed to hearing for top performers in the top groups in New York is well above the average for cities around the world. The compensation average graphs are a global average which includes regional cities and groups that bring the average down. If you would like company and group specific compensation data, please visit the WSO Company Database.
Where does this data come from?
The compensation, review and interview data comes from WSO member submissions to the WSO Company Database. With over 50,000 submissions to date across thousands of companies, the database is solely a representation of what our members were paid and how they rank companies on various metrics. Please see below for a detailed breakdown of the member statistics for those that have contributed to the database.
What are the percentile rankings based on?
The percentile rankings of companies listed here are based on the current YTD and the prior two years of data for companies that received at least one vote. The simple average scores are converted into an Adjusted Score before the companies are ranked to take into account companies with a smaller sample size. This method uses Bayesian Statistics.
Why do you use Bayesian Statistics to adjust scores?
This methodology is used in order to account for standard deviation in rankings. As a company gets more rankings and data, we have more confidence that the average ranking is a true reflection of reality, so this is reflected in the adjusted scores and Percentile rankings. Learn more about Bayesian Statistics here.
Why don't I see company XYZ?
Some great smaller firms may not be represented in the rankings for the simple reason that we have not collected enough data to represent them accurately or for us to have enough data to display them at all.
What is the geographical representation of the submissions?
The WSO user base is very US-centric with approximately 70% of all submissions coming within the United States of America. Please see the detailed breakdown of the member statistics for those that have contributed to the database. For more company and city specific compensation, please visit the WSO Company Database.
or Want to Sign up with your social account?