PRIVATE EQUITY DIVERSITY STATS - As of December, 2023

This employer diversity data is based solely on user submissions to the WSO Company Database for interviews and employment during 2021, 2022, 2023.
Racial Diversity
Firm
YoY Δ
Percentile
Global Infrastructure Partners
No
98.9%
Vista Equity Partners
No
97.8%
Blackstone Group
No
96.6%
Arrowroot Capital
04
95.5%
Adams Street Partners
28
94.4%
K1 Investment Management
10
93.3%
HarbourVest
52
92.1%
General Atlantic
42
91.0%
Bain Capital
02
89.9%
Altamont Capital
37
88.8%
Veritas Capital Fund Management, LLC
01
87.6%
Partners Group
06
86.5%
Carlyle Group
04
85.4%
Constellation Software Inc
10
84.3%
Hamilton Lane
No
83.1%
KKR (Kohlberg Kravis Roberts)
05
82.0%
Advent International Corporation
12
80.9%
Novacap
06
79.8%
H.I.G. Capital
16
78.7%
Insight Venture Partners
02
77.5%
Silver Lake
07
76.4%
Ardian
24
75.3%
Audax Group
13
74.2%
Roark Capital Group
01
73.0%
LLR Partners
19
71.9%
L Catterton
06
70.8%
Providence Strategic Growth
No
69.7%
Graham Partners
02
68.5%
OMERS
19
67.4%
The Riverside Company
06
66.3%

Percentile rank on racial diversity based on how balanced companies are across five primary groups: Caucasian, Asian, African American, Latino/Spanish Origin and Other

Companies with only 10 or more submissions included

The up and down arrows next to each company represent the relative increase or decrease in position compared to the prior year report. The "= =" equal signs means there was no change and the "+ +" plus signs indicate a new company on the statistics.

Female Representation
Firm
YoY Δ
Percentile
Parthenon Capital Partners (53.0%)
06
99.0%
Centerbridge Partners (51.8%)
02
98.1%
Providence Strategic Growth (51.8%)
01
97.1%
Silver Lake (47.1%)
01
96.1%
HQ Capital (45.4%)
17
95.1%
Apollo Global Management (41.8%)
56
94.2%
KKR (Kohlberg Kravis Roberts) (38.7%)
02
93.2%
Aquiline Capital Partners (36.3%)
17
92.2%
New Mountain Capital (36.3%)
01
91.3%
JMI Equity (35.3%)
36
90.3%
NextGen Growth Partners (34.5%)
44
89.3%
Bain Capital (32.7%)
20
88.3%
Starwood Capital Group (32.1%)
03
87.4%
Adams Street Partners (31.1%)
01
86.4%
LLR Partners (29.9%)
27
85.4%
Partners Group (29.8%)
05
84.5%
L Catterton (28.9%)
16
83.5%
Novacap (28.8%)
97
82.5%
Vista Equity Partners (28.1%)
01
81.6%
Alpine Investors (27.2%)
04
80.6%
Equity Group Investments (27.2%)
67
79.6%
Charlesbank Capital Partners (27.2%)
29
78.6%
General Atlantic (26.5%)
06
77.7%
Global Infrastructure Partners (26.5%)
10
76.7%
Warburg Pincus (26.1%)
04
75.7%
Hamilton Lane (25.6%)
28
74.8%
Audax Group (24.6%)
12
73.8%
Cerberus Capital Management (24.4%)
08
72.8%
Altamont Capital (24.2%)
11
71.8%
Eurazeo (24.2%)
25
70.9%

Estimate percentage of females is shown in parenthesis after the company name

Companies with only 10 or more submissions included

The up and down arrows next to each company represent the relative increase or decrease in position compared to the prior year report. The "= =" equal signs means there was no change and the "+ +" plus signs indicate a new company on the statistics.

Athletic Representation
Firm
YoY Δ
Percentile
Constellation Software Inc (46.4%)
02
99.0%
Graham Partners (43.6%)
05
98.1%
CIM Group (42.1%)
03
97.1%
Volition Capital (42.1%)
03
96.1%
Audax Group (41.8%)
03
95.1%
Summit Partners (38.8%)
08
94.2%
Roark Capital Group (37.3%)
03
93.2%
Alpine Investors (26.9%)
05
92.2%
Equity Group Investments (26.3%)
No
91.3%
The Riverside Company (25.5%)
08
90.3%
JMI Equity (23.4%)
No
89.3%
Copley Equity Partners (22.1%)
04
88.3%
Fortress Investment Group (22.1%)
14
87.4%
Pretium Partners LLC (22.1%)
07
86.4%
Landmark Partners (22.1%)
05
85.4%
American Securities (22.1%)
07
84.5%
Koch Equity Development (22.1%)
New
83.5%
Cinven (21.1%)
87
82.5%
AEA Investors (21.1%)
12
81.6%
K1 Investment Management (19.4%)
12
80.6%
Accel-KKR (18.5%)
04
79.6%
LLR Partners (17.1%)
23
78.6%
Coller Capital (15.8%)
05
77.7%
H.I.G. Capital (15.8%)
13
76.7%
LGT Capital Partners (15.1%)
15
75.7%
Carlyle Group (14.1%)
20
74.8%
Vista Equity Partners (14.1%)
11
73.8%
KKR (Kohlberg Kravis Roberts) (13.0%)
06
72.8%
Advent International Corporation (12.9%)
24
71.8%
Ardian (12.4%)
09
70.9%

Estimated percentage of varsity athletes is shown in parenthesis after the company name

Companies with only 10 or more submissions included

The up and down arrows next to each company represent the relative increase or decrease in position compared to the prior year report. The "= =" equal signs means there was no change and the "+ +" plus signs indicate a new company on the statistics.

Military Representation
Firm
YoY Δ
Percentile
Silver Lake (18.2%)
No
99.0%
Vista Equity Partners (9.1%)
01
98.1%
Ardian (9.1%)
01
97.1%
Advent International Corporation (4.2%)
108
96.1%
Hamilton Lane (3.6%)
02
95.1%
Partners Group (2.0%)
02
94.2%
Copley Equity Partners (0.1%)
58
93.2%
Fortress Investment Group (0.1%)
28
92.2%
Export Development Canada (0.1%)
06
91.3%
Golden Gate Capital (0.1%)
27
90.3%
RCP Advisors (0.1%)
27
89.3%
Susquehanna Growth Equity (0.1%)
29
88.3%
Permira Advisers (0.1%)
73
87.4%
Bridge Investment Group (0.1%)
New
86.4%
Pretium Partners LLC (0.1%)
03
85.4%
Wind Point Partners (0.1%)
New
84.5%
Thomas H Lee Partners (THL) (0.1%)
44
83.5%
TZP (0.1%)
31
82.5%
CIM Group (0.1%)
01
81.6%
Amundi (0.1%)
New
80.6%
Helios Investment Partners (0.1%)
New
79.6%
Sofina (0.1%)
No
78.6%
Rubicon Technology Partners (0.1%)
New
77.7%
ICONIQ Capital (0.1%)
New
76.7%
Volition Capital (0.1%)
43
75.7%
Landmark Partners (0.1%)
49
74.8%
Monomoy Capital Partners (0.1%)
23
73.8%
Welsh Carson Anderson Stowe WCAS (0.1%)
01
72.8%
Altas Partners (0.1%)
22
71.8%
American Securities (0.1%)
01
70.9%

Estimated percentage of employees with military association is shown in parenthesis after the company name

Companies with only 10 or more submissions included

The up and down arrows next to each company represent the relative increase or decrease in position compared to the prior year report. The "= =" equal signs means there was no change and the "+ +" plus signs indicate a new company on the statistics

Company Specific Salary and Bonus Data Available

Methodology FAQ

How often is this data updated?
The rankings are constantly changing and evolving based on additional data we collect every day. The graphs and tables use the data from YTD and the prior 2 years. See tabs located above on this page to access previous year rankings.
Why do the average compensation numbers look so low?
Remember that the compensation you are accustomed to hearing for top performers in the top groups in New York is well above the average for cities around the world. The compensation average graphs are a global average which includes regional cities and groups that bring the average down. If you would like company and group specific compensation data, please visit the WSO Company Database.
Where does this data come from?
The compensation, review and interview data comes from WSO member submissions to the WSO Company Database. With over 50,000 submissions to date across thousands of companies, the database is solely a representation of what our members were paid and how they rank companies on various metrics. Please see below for a detailed breakdown of the member statistics for those that have contributed to the database.
What are the percentile rankings based on?
The percentile rankings of companies listed here are based on the current YTD and the prior two years of data for companies that received at least one vote. The simple average scores are converted into an Adjusted Score before the companies are ranked to take into account companies with a smaller sample size. This method uses Bayesian Statistics.
Why do you use Bayesian Statistics to adjust scores?
This methodology is used in order to account for standard deviation in rankings. As a company gets more rankings and data, we have more confidence that the average ranking is a true reflection of reality, so this is reflected in the adjusted scores and Percentile rankings. Learn more about Bayesian Statistics here.
Why don't I see company XYZ?
Some great smaller firms may not be represented in the rankings for the simple reason that we have not collected enough data to represent them accurately or for us to have enough data to display them at all.
What is the geographical representation of the submissions?
The WSO user base is very US-centric with approximately 70% of all submissions coming within the United States of America. Please see the detailed breakdown of the member statistics for those that have contributed to the database. For more company and city specific compensation, please visit the WSO Company Database.