PRIVATE EQUITY DIVERSITY STATS - As of December, 2016
This employer diversity data is based solely on user submissions to the WSO Company Database for interviews and employment during 2014, 2015, 2016.
Racial Diversity
Firm
YoY Δ
Percentile
HarbourVest
02
97.9%
Warburg Pincus
14
95.7%
Carlyle Group
04
93.6%
Apollo Global Management
03
91.5%
Blackstone Group
09
89.4%
3i
03
87.2%
Summit Partners
03
85.1%
Silver Lake
04
83.0%
American Capital
01
80.9%
Fortress Investment Group
05
78.7%
The Abraaj Group
New
76.6%
The Riverside Company
06
74.5%
Onex
11
72.3%
Starwood Capital Group
03
70.2%
Chatham Capital
21
68.1%
Blackford Capital
New
66.0%
KKR (Kohlberg Kravis Roberts)
11
63.8%
Partners Group
05
61.7%
H.I.G. Capital
17
59.6%
TPG Global
01
57.4%
Audax Group
01
55.3%
TorreyCove Capital Partners LLC
31
53.2%
ABRY Partners
08
51.1%
Bain Capital
19
48.9%
Teachers Private Capital
05
46.8%
GTCR
03
44.7%
Riverside Partners
07
42.6%
American Infrastructure MLP Funds
07
40.4%
JMI Equity
08
38.3%
Leonard Green and Partners
New
36.2%
Percentile rank on racial diversity based on how balanced companies are across five primary groups: Caucasian, Asian, African American, Latino/Spanish Origin and Other
Companies with only 10 or more submissions included
The up and down arrows next to each company represent the relative increase or decrease in position compared to the prior year report. The "= =" equal signs means there was no change and the "+ +" plus signs indicate a new company on the statistics.
Female Representation
Firm
YoY Δ
Percentile
Level Equity (62.3%)
No
98.1%
Fosun (42.3%)
New
96.2%
Graham Partners (42.3%)
New
94.2%
Blackstone Group (28.0%)
01
92.3%
Warburg Pincus (25.7%)
03
90.4%
Carlyle Group (25.7%)
02
88.5%
Hamilton Lane (23.9%)
02
86.5%
Balbec Capital LP (22.3%)
New
84.6%
TA Associates (22.3%)
New
82.7%
CITIC Capital (18.5%)
New
80.8%
Ardian (15.9%)
06
78.8%
Silver Lake (15.9%)
01
76.9%
Teachers Private Capital (13.9%)
01
75.0%
Bain Capital (13.2%)
04
73.1%
Onex (12.4%)
25
71.2%
Summit Partners (12.4%)
26
69.2%
Audax Group (11.1%)
20
67.3%
H.I.G. Capital (8.6%)
10
65.4%
Partners Group (8.6%)
05
63.5%
Starwood Capital Group (7.9%)
23
61.5%
KKR (Kohlberg Kravis Roberts) (7.9%)
24
59.6%
Shore Capital Partners (2.3%)
09
57.7%
Chatham Capital (2.3%)
06
55.8%
Cerberus Capital Management (2.3%)
15
53.8%
Charlesbank Capital Partners (2.3%)
07
51.9%
The Carlyle Group (2.3%)
New
50.0%
CIM Group (2.3%)
New
48.1%
Lone Star Funds (2.3%)
New
46.2%
Blackford Capital (2.3%)
New
44.2%
GTCR (2.3%)
10
42.3%
Estimate percentage of females is shown in parenthesis after the company name
Companies with only 10 or more submissions included
The up and down arrows next to each company represent the relative increase or decrease in position compared to the prior year report. The "= =" equal signs means there was no change and the "+ +" plus signs indicate a new company on the statistics.
Athletic Representation
Firm
YoY Δ
Percentile
Bostonian Capital Management Company (62.4%)
New
98.1%
Fortress Investment Group (52.0%)
04
96.2%
Cerberus Capital Management (42.4%)
01
94.2%
H.I.G. Capital (31.7%)
No
92.3%
Lone Star Funds (22.4%)
New
90.4%
Centerbridge Partners (22.4%)
02
88.5%
American Infrastructure MLP Funds (22.4%)
02
86.5%
Audax Group (21.2%)
03
84.6%
TorreyCove Capital Partners LLC (18.6%)
20
82.7%
3i (18.6%)
35
80.8%
American Capital (18.6%)
06
78.8%
Apollo Global Management (16.3%)
04
76.9%
Partners Group (16.3%)
03
75.0%
Starwood Capital Group (15.1%)
36
73.1%
KKR (Kohlberg Kravis Roberts) (14.1%)
No
71.2%
Silver Lake (14.0%)
05
69.2%
Warburg Pincus (13.2%)
36
67.3%
Summit Partners (12.4%)
02
65.4%
Blackstone Group (10.1%)
04
63.5%
Hamilton Lane (8.6%)
02
61.5%
Bain Capital (6.6%)
01
59.6%
Shore Capital Partners (2.4%)
20
57.7%
Chatham Capital (2.4%)
04
55.8%
Charlesbank Capital Partners (2.4%)
12
53.8%
The Carlyle Group (2.4%)
New
51.9%
Fosun (2.4%)
New
50.0%
CIM Group (2.4%)
New
48.1%
Graham Partners (2.4%)
New
46.2%
Blackford Capital (2.4%)
New
44.2%
GTCR (2.4%)
14
42.3%
Estimated percentage of varsity athletes is shown in parenthesis after the company name
Companies with only 10 or more submissions included
The up and down arrows next to each company represent the relative increase or decrease in position compared to the prior year report. The "= =" equal signs means there was no change and the "+ +" plus signs indicate a new company on the statistics.
Military Representation
Firm
YoY Δ
Percentile
HarbourVest (12.5%)
44
98.1%
Blackstone Group (3.2%)
No
96.2%
Shore Capital Partners (0.1%)
22
94.2%
Chatham Capital (0.1%)
04
92.3%
Cerberus Capital Management (0.1%)
31
90.4%
Charlesbank Capital Partners (0.1%)
21
88.5%
The Carlyle Group (0.1%)
New
86.5%
Fosun (0.1%)
New
84.6%
CIM Group (0.1%)
New
82.7%
Lone Star Funds (0.1%)
New
80.8%
Graham Partners (0.1%)
New
78.8%
Blackford Capital (0.1%)
New
76.9%
GTCR (0.1%)
16
75.0%
Centerbridge Partners (0.1%)
01
73.1%
Leonard Green and Partners (0.1%)
New
71.2%
American Infrastructure MLP Funds (0.1%)
No
69.2%
Ares Capital Management (0.1%)
04
67.3%
CCMP Capital Advisors (0.1%)
01
65.4%
Vista Equity Partners (0.1%)
New
63.5%
General Atlantic (0.1%)
18
61.5%
Balbec Capital LP (0.1%)
New
59.6%
JMI Equity (0.1%)
08
57.7%
TA Associates (0.1%)
New
55.8%
Level Equity (0.1%)
04
53.8%
Wasserstein & Co. (0.1%)
04
51.9%
Setter Capital Inc (0.1%)
04
50.0%
Bostonian Capital Management Company (0.1%)
New
48.1%
WL Ross and Co LLC (0.1%)
New
46.2%
TorreyCove Capital Partners LLC (0.1%)
19
44.2%
3i (0.1%)
01
42.3%
Estimated percentage of employees with military association is shown in parenthesis after the company name
Companies with only 10 or more submissions included
The up and down arrows next to each company represent the relative increase or decrease in position compared to the prior year report. The "= =" equal signs means there was no change and the "+ +" plus signs indicate a new company on the statistics
Company Specific Salary and Bonus Data Available
Methodology FAQ
How often is this data updated?
The rankings are constantly changing and evolving based on additional data we collect every day. The graphs and tables use the data from YTD and the prior 2 years. See tabs located above on this page to access previous year rankings.
Why do the average compensation numbers look so low?
Remember that the compensation you are accustomed to hearing for top performers in the top groups in New York is well above the average for cities around the world. The compensation average graphs are a global average which includes regional cities and groups that bring the average down. If you would like company and group specific compensation data, please visit the WSO Company Database.
Where does this data come from?
The compensation, review and interview data comes from WSO member submissions to the WSO Company Database. With over 50,000 submissions to date across thousands of companies, the database is solely a representation of what our members were paid and how they rank companies on various metrics. Please see below for a detailed breakdown of the member statistics for those that have contributed to the database.
What are the percentile rankings based on?
The percentile rankings of companies listed here are based on the current YTD and the prior two years of data for companies that received at least one vote. The simple average scores are converted into an Adjusted Score before the companies are ranked to take into account companies with a smaller sample size. This method uses Bayesian Statistics.
Why do you use Bayesian Statistics to adjust scores?
This methodology is used in order to account for standard deviation in rankings. As a company gets more rankings and data, we have more confidence that the average ranking is a true reflection of reality, so this is reflected in the adjusted scores and Percentile rankings. Learn more about Bayesian Statistics here.
Why don't I see company XYZ?
Some great smaller firms may not be represented in the rankings for the simple reason that we have not collected enough data to represent them accurately or for us to have enough data to display them at all.
What is the geographical representation of the submissions?
The WSO user base is very US-centric with approximately 70% of all submissions coming within the United States of America. Please see the detailed breakdown of the member statistics for those that have contributed to the database. For more company and city specific compensation, please visit the WSO Company Database.
or Want to Sign up with your social account?