PRIVATE EQUITY DIVERSITY STATS - As of December, 2025
This employer diversity data is based solely on user submissions to the WSO Company Database for interviews and employment during 2023, 2024, 2025.
Racial Diversity
Firm
YoY Δ
Percentile
Audax Group
14
98.5%
Accel-KKR
31
97.1%
Vista Equity Partners
No
95.6%
Ardian
03
94.1%
KKR (Kohlberg Kravis Roberts)
03
92.6%
Altamont Capital
02
91.2%
Blackstone Group
02
89.7%
HarbourVest
07
88.2%
H.I.G. Capital
07
86.8%
Advent International Corporation
08
85.3%
Bain Capital
05
83.8%
Partners Group
02
82.4%
Graham Partners
No
80.9%
K1 Investment Management
03
79.4%
Hamilton Lane
03
77.9%
Star Mountain Capital
New
76.5%
General Atlantic
01
75.0%
Warburg Pincus
02
73.5%
Carlyle Group
09
72.1%
Eurazeo
02
70.6%
Aldrich Capital Partners
09
69.1%
HarbourVest Partners
New
67.6%
Odyssey Investment Partners
New
66.2%
The Riverside Company
15
64.7%
Adams Street Partners
04
63.2%
Susquehanna Growth Equity
New
61.8%
Actis
11
60.3%
Insight Partners
New
58.8%
Incline Equity Partners
New
57.4%
Novacap
10
55.9%
Percentile rank on racial diversity based on how balanced companies are across five primary groups: Caucasian, Asian, African American, Latino/Spanish Origin and Other
Companies with only 10 or more submissions included
The up and down arrows next to each company represent the relative increase or decrease in position compared to the prior year report. The "= =" equal signs means there was no change and the "+ +" plus signs indicate a new company on the statistics.
Female Representation
Firm
YoY Δ
Percentile
Centerbridge Partners (70.7%)
01
98.8%
NextGen Growth Partners (65.5%)
01
97.5%
Charlesbank Capital Partners (54.0%)
01
96.3%
Apollo Global Management (53.0%)
01
95.0%
LLR Partners (47.1%)
17
93.8%
Cinven (46.3%)
26
92.5%
Hamilton Lane (46.2%)
09
91.3%
Livingbridge (44.9%)
New
90.0%
CriticalPoint Capital (44.9%)
New
88.8%
Trive Capital (44.9%)
New
87.5%
GCM Grosvenor (44.9%)
26
86.3%
Graham Partners (41.6%)
06
85.0%
Partners Group (39.4%)
06
83.8%
Novacap (39.0%)
03
82.5%
Global Infrastructure Partners (37.4%)
05
81.3%
Altamont Capital (37.4%)
04
80.0%
Odyssey Investment Partners (37.4%)
New
78.8%
I Squared Capital (36.0%)
11
77.5%
Ardian (33.0%)
20
76.3%
Vista Equity Partners (32.4%)
11
75.0%
General Atlantic (32.0%)
03
73.8%
Astorg Partners (32.0%)
New
72.5%
Audax Group (29.5%)
10
71.3%
Bain Capital (29.1%)
02
70.0%
Accel-KKR (28.0%)
No
68.8%
Starwood Capital Group (24.9%)
03
67.5%
Alpine Investors (24.9%)
16
66.3%
GTCR (24.9%)
07
65.0%
Accordion Partners (24.9%)
02
63.8%
One Equity Partners (24.9%)
New
62.5%
Estimate percentage of females is shown in parenthesis after the company name
Companies with only 10 or more submissions included
The up and down arrows next to each company represent the relative increase or decrease in position compared to the prior year report. The "= =" equal signs means there was no change and the "+ +" plus signs indicate a new company on the statistics.
Athletic Representation
Firm
YoY Δ
Percentile
Lone Star Funds (62.9%)
New
98.8%
Creador (45.0%)
61
97.5%
Aldrich Capital Partners (35.8%)
01
96.3%
Sweetwater Private Equity (35.8%)
New
95.0%
Cerberus Capital Management (35.8%)
03
93.8%
Carlyle Group (31.5%)
34
92.5%
Cinven (30.7%)
08
91.3%
AEA Investors (26.8%)
03
90.0%
Providence Strategic Growth (26.8%)
26
88.8%
HarbourVest Partners (26.8%)
New
87.5%
K1 Investment Management (26.2%)
06
86.3%
The Riverside Company (24.2%)
06
85.0%
Starwood Capital Group (23.9%)
59
83.8%
Alpine Investors (23.9%)
No
82.5%
GTCR (22.9%)
05
81.3%
Trive Capital (22.9%)
New
80.0%
Shore Capital Partners (22.9%)
New
78.8%
Hellman & Friedman LLC (22.9%)
New
77.5%
TowerBrook Capital Partners LP (22.9%)
02
76.3%
DW Healthcare Partners (22.9%)
New
75.0%
TPG Global (22.5%)
01
73.8%
Warburg Pincus (21.5%)
57
72.5%
Trivest Partners (19.1%)
10
71.3%
Main Street Capital (19.1%)
12
70.0%
Rubicon Technology Partners (16.4%)
28
68.8%
Roark Capital Group (16.4%)
04
67.5%
Blackstone Group (15.9%)
07
66.3%
Hamilton Lane (15.7%)
03
65.0%
NextGen Growth Partners (14.3%)
08
63.8%
Apollo Global Management (14.3%)
02
62.5%
Estimated percentage of varsity athletes is shown in parenthesis after the company name
Companies with only 10 or more submissions included
The up and down arrows next to each company represent the relative increase or decrease in position compared to the prior year report. The "= =" equal signs means there was no change and the "+ +" plus signs indicate a new company on the statistics.
Military Representation
Firm
YoY Δ
Percentile
Eurazeo (28.9%)
No
98.8%
Starwood Capital Group (22.5%)
50
97.5%
Portfolio Advisors LLC (20.4%)
14
96.3%
Cerberus Capital Management (17.0%)
01
95.0%
HarbourVest Partners (12.8%)
New
93.8%
Advent International Corporation (11.3%)
01
92.5%
Ardian (8.1%)
03
91.3%
Blackstone Group (2.3%)
01
90.0%
GTCR (0.4%)
25
88.8%
Accordion Partners (0.4%)
04
87.5%
One Equity Partners (0.4%)
New
86.3%
Livingbridge (0.4%)
New
85.0%
Lone Star Funds (0.4%)
New
83.8%
Altas Partners (0.4%)
32
82.5%
CriticalPoint Capital (0.4%)
New
81.3%
CIM Group (0.4%)
29
80.0%
BlackFin Capital Partners (0.4%)
New
78.8%
Trive Capital (0.4%)
New
77.5%
Flexpoint Ford (0.4%)
New
76.3%
Bregal Sagemount (0.4%)
New
75.0%
Shore Capital Partners (0.4%)
New
73.8%
KSL Capital Partners (0.4%)
New
72.5%
Mvision Private Equity Advisors (0.4%)
01
71.3%
Hellman & Friedman LLC (0.4%)
New
70.0%
Level Equity (0.4%)
New
68.8%
Adams Street Partners (0.4%)
15
67.5%
TowerBrook Capital Partners LP (0.4%)
13
66.3%
GCM Grosvenor (0.4%)
11
65.0%
DW Healthcare Partners (0.4%)
New
63.8%
bpifrance (0.4%)
15
62.5%
Estimated percentage of employees with military association is shown in parenthesis after the company name
Companies with only 10 or more submissions included
The up and down arrows next to each company represent the relative increase or decrease in position compared to the prior year report. The "= =" equal signs means there was no change and the "+ +" plus signs indicate a new company on the statistics
Company Specific Salary and Bonus Data Available
Methodology FAQ
How often is this data updated?
The rankings are constantly changing and evolving based on additional data we collect every day. The graphs and tables use the data from YTD and the prior 2 years. See tabs located above on this page to access previous year rankings.
Why do the average compensation numbers look so low?
Remember that the compensation you are accustomed to hearing for top performers in the top groups in New York is well above the average for cities around the world. The compensation average graphs are a global average which includes regional cities and groups that bring the average down. If you would like company and group specific compensation data, please visit the WSO Company Database.
Where does this data come from?
The compensation, review and interview data comes from WSO member submissions to the WSO Company Database. With over 50,000 submissions to date across thousands of companies, the database is solely a representation of what our members were paid and how they rank companies on various metrics. Please see below for a detailed breakdown of the member statistics for those that have contributed to the database.
What are the percentile rankings based on?
The percentile rankings of companies listed here are based on the current YTD and the prior two years of data for companies that received at least one vote. The simple average scores are converted into an Adjusted Score before the companies are ranked to take into account companies with a smaller sample size. This method uses Bayesian Statistics.
Why do you use Bayesian Statistics to adjust scores?
This methodology is used in order to account for standard deviation in rankings. As a company gets more rankings and data, we have more confidence that the average ranking is a true reflection of reality, so this is reflected in the adjusted scores and Percentile rankings. Learn more about Bayesian Statistics here.
Why don't I see company XYZ?
Some great smaller firms may not be represented in the rankings for the simple reason that we have not collected enough data to represent them accurately or for us to have enough data to display them at all.
What is the geographical representation of the submissions?
The WSO user base is very US-centric with approximately 70% of all submissions coming within the United States of America. Please see the detailed breakdown of the member statistics for those that have contributed to the database. For more company and city specific compensation, please visit the WSO Company Database.
or Want to Sign up with your social account?