New Goldman Recruiting Process

Has anyone applied to Goldman yet and heard back about the video interview yet? Any insight is appreciated.

8/12/16 Update -- gathered form the comments here's what we presume to know so far:

  • These interviews are currently being given to students applying for 2017 summer internships. It seems many of these candidates applied in July
  • It is not a real-time interview, it's a recording using HireVue, so they'll show you a series of questions on the screen and you'll have a limited amount of time to record each answer
  • The application portal says the deadline is December 4, 2016, though some of the candidates that have done these already are diversity applicants (who have an earlier deadline)
  • Invites were sent this past week to non-diversity candidates as well
  • These video interviews are 15 minutes long. You have 30 seconds to view the question and then 3 minutes to respond by simply recording your answer
  • HireVue is the software being used. JPM is also using this software for interviews
 

I'm quite new to this process so any insight would be appreciated.

The application portal says the deadline is 4 December, but does the fact that first round (video) interview invites are being handed out mean that it's more or less too late to apply?

 
Best Response

So if I'll get an invite to that virtual interview, can I put "Incoming interview candidate at Goldman Sachs" to my linked in profile?

On a serious note I would assume this is done to speed up the process and I would assume no one will listen to all the interviews. Thus, they are using ML algo that will iterate through all the recordings looking for keywords and then select a handfull of recording for a recruiter to hear. So, I would advise to use keywords that would make you sound like a true BSD and if you need to know the keywords read this: http://www.leveragedsellout.com/2007/04/only-87-tool/

You killed the Greece spread goes up, spread goes down, from Wall Street they all play like a freak, Goldman Sachs 'o beat.
 

a quick LinkedIn search will show numerous people in FO roles at GS from schools such as Penn State, Georgetown, Notre Dame, and U of California - Berkeley , obviously very good schools , but not Harvard, Penn, or Princeton , I think this bias is dwindling down year after year, schools like Boston College and the like seem to be doing very well lately in placing grads in IBD

 

absolutely it does, it just seems to be more open now, as an Associate from HL told me over the phone just last week " This isn't 1987 , all of the young prospective bankers need to drop the Wharton or bust mentality" while it absolutely helps going to a top 5 people are obviously making it happen from other backgrounds.

 

Perspective from the flip side (im a consultant in talent aq): GS gets so many applicants that they need to automate processes. If you actually make it to this phase it doesn't matter. The best way to get a job at GS is to know somebody that's hiring. No different than any other place.

 

Overall this is yet another example of Goldman making the recruiting process trash as fuck in an effort to look more "standardized". I didn't know jack shit technicals-wise and had barely started networking deep into my junior fall and ended up more than competent as an analyst. This kind of shit is going to make people like me extinct, at least at the BBs, in the future.

Goldman's itchy trigger finger regarding hiring their entire SA class damn near an entire year early pretty much ended the utility of formal OCR at my school. What remained was this hodgepodge of incomplete and shoddy information from HR and alums at various banks partly because no one knew what the fuck was going on because banks didn't know when offers exploded/what processes were going/how quickly they were proceeding. This "secure the class early" mindset somewhat makes sense at the buyside because of the recruiting pool being mostly all at banks, a pretty homogenous applicant base, tradition, lean teams, etc. For banking it makes no sense. Recruiting during sophomore summer (!) means wiping out a ton of kids who could have decided on finance late, haven't done the usual case competition/investing clubs in depth yet, are working outside of finance, or otherwise haven't focused on finance in the four semesters of school under their belt (two for transfers!). If anything else, it seems like a great way to miss out on potential good banking talent.

This whole video thing similarly misses the mark. Yes, there's less "judging" of fit in person that may unnecessarily skew towards a certain applicant, but IMO the loss of not being able to ask follow-ups, pursue interesting "leads" when it comes to people's experiences, or even to judge their technical knowledge in depth is more significant. The system seems designed to reward people who can offer the "best" canned responses to formulaic-ass questions. Then again, GS/JPM aren't exactly known for being shy in their embrace of hardos and mouth-breathers.

 

The only thing I took from this post is that HireVue is gaining a major foothold. It's a great company and a great platform. I'm glad to hear that both JPM and GS are using them. And no, I have no affiliation with HireVue, I just know a few people higher up in the ladder who work for them and I'm genuinely glad to hear that the company is doing great.

 

So what impact does this have on campus visits? The official deadline is in December, but GS is coming September/October for an info session. Does it make sense to wait until their visit, or is it better to apply now?

 
Grylls:

What is the entire application process for the IBD summer analyst position? (Preferably in London but if you only know US that would be helpful too).

I assume it is online application -> if successful invite to video interview -> if successful invite to assessment day which consists of 2 or 3 interviews -> offer/rejection?

I just received my Superday offer ~2 weeks after submitting my Hirevue. Seems like the process is Apply -> Hirevue -> superday. This is for securities.

 

Voluptate temporibus aspernatur dolorum at velit omnis non. Cum quos unde aut. Deleniti iure omnis sit eos non. Natus accusantium ipsum quo provident ut voluptatibus voluptatum. Incidunt voluptates illo odio.

Maxime debitis est quia sed repellendus debitis necessitatibus. Et saepe numquam aperiam delectus est. Eos quia non a ullam et veritatis.

Dignissimos reiciendis recusandae rem in. Dicta rerum ex illum harum.

 

Quaerat nostrum porro quia aut qui eos ea. Dolores sed quasi fugit iure fugit. Eaque quo hic aut maxime.

Suscipit fuga eligendi quia temporibus dolores. Blanditiis maxime occaecati nesciunt nobis omnis. Voluptate sequi omnis facilis suscipit. Reiciendis et qui esse provident est ducimus omnis. Est consequatur ut sapiente nulla cum non optio. Voluptatibus aut quo nostrum exercitationem facilis. Et voluptas consequuntur quod natus reprehenderit magnam.

 

Et ut sunt et doloremque deserunt. A expedita cum beatae distinctio eius eius mollitia. Et sit adipisci rerum fugiat et. Porro harum fugiat aliquam vel natus nostrum. Sunt ea omnis nemo ducimus debitis veniam.

Eum ut deleniti non et reiciendis alias. Consequatur facilis nam aliquam a sit sed earum. Quia sint esse maxime id omnis asperiores. Dolorem perferendis nemo odit alias minus. Non ea deserunt nostrum vel. Et placeat sit qui consequatur voluptatem et similique.

Ducimus eum vel aut voluptates quo quia. Dicta distinctio est velit rerum et vitae. Eum delectus rerum eveniet est. Amet quia consequatur doloremque optio repellendus laborum facere. Eligendi ea iure sunt blanditiis.

Doloremque sit amet distinctio sed reiciendis qui quam. Aliquam qui quis sit odio necessitatibus nesciunt iusto.

 

Magni eum ut adipisci odit quam. Quis nobis praesentium exercitationem qui eaque aut. Occaecati ut enim amet vel qui voluptatum quod. Et sed autem sunt ipsam. Necessitatibus ut aut ex iste itaque.

Est non qui voluptatem et eaque at. Qui dolores ex odio itaque autem. Ex nostrum excepturi enim dolorem sed minima mollitia. Et incidunt nostrum asperiores dolores a vel.

Itaque adipisci est aliquid qui. Ea consequatur aut modi eveniet molestiae. Quia sunt labore iure unde architecto amet. Assumenda quia officiis ducimus corporis quo voluptatem hic. Excepturi voluptas nisi at aperiam reprehenderit. Est cumque quod qui illo rem reiciendis.

Career Advancement Opportunities

May 2024 Investment Banking

  • Jefferies & Company 02 99.4%
  • Goldman Sachs 19 98.8%
  • Harris Williams & Co. New 98.3%
  • Lazard Freres 02 97.7%
  • JPMorgan Chase 04 97.1%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

May 2024 Investment Banking

  • Harris Williams & Co. 18 99.4%
  • JPMorgan Chase 10 98.8%
  • Lazard Freres 05 98.3%
  • Morgan Stanley 07 97.7%
  • William Blair 03 97.1%

Professional Growth Opportunities

May 2024 Investment Banking

  • Lazard Freres 01 99.4%
  • Jefferies & Company 02 98.8%
  • Goldman Sachs 17 98.3%
  • Moelis & Company 07 97.7%
  • JPMorgan Chase 05 97.1%

Total Avg Compensation

May 2024 Investment Banking

  • Director/MD (5) $648
  • Vice President (19) $385
  • Associates (88) $260
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (14) $181
  • Intern/Summer Associate (33) $170
  • 2nd Year Analyst (67) $168
  • 1st Year Analyst (205) $159
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (146) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
3
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
4
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
99.0
5
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
6
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
7
kanon's picture
kanon
98.9
8
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
9
Linda Abraham's picture
Linda Abraham
98.8
10
numi's picture
numi
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”