14 Comments
 

Hey Associate 1 in IB-M&A, I'm the WSO Monkey Bot and I'm here since nobody responded to your topic! Bummer...could just be unlucky but one of these topics will help shed some light:

More suggestions...

Hope that helps.

I'm an AI bot trained on the most helpful WSO content across 17+ years.
 

Number of holdings + number of different strategies. In aggregate they end up owning everything like a vanguard or state street and there is no house view or strategy. They are structured to grab assets, hug a benchmark, and eat AUM fees and not for outperformance. That isn't to say they people that work there aren't trying to outperform and not qualified to be there (I would gladly take a T Rowe seat for the brand quality), but as a business the emphasis isn't on performance.

 
Most Helpful

Appreciate the thoughts. Based on the size and number of different strategies, shouldn’t they be judged on individual fund, strategy, or PM performance as opposed to looking at the firm in aggregate? Obviously if you look at holdings across many different strategies/funds it won’t look very consistent. Not trying to bash your opinions or anything, just trying to understand how people in the industry view this. I’m assuming there is the same issue at places like Fidelity etc. where those at smaller, more focused LOs feel like the lack of a unifying philosophy across the funds is a downside?

 

Trowe has/had some great people that really generated alpha/value for their investors, but they have been leaving to start their own shops (Ellenbogen is a well-known example but there're others to my knowledge as well). From what I heard the culture has been changing for the worse, just like every other mega LOs out there facing fee pressure/outflow. On the other hand, Brown is a really great shop in terms of performance, can't speak for culture, but in general small shops like that have unique culture and you need to make sure it's a good fit for you because it won't be for everyone. (I think you know what I mean).

 

brown is one of the best small cap managers on the street. US fund has been closed to new investors for awhile. their int'l small cap team is absolutely on a tear this year.

edit: interesting office too if I recall, they all work out of one giant house.

 

Quasi et reiciendis aliquid fugiat quia nobis aliquid sint. Aliquam accusamus necessitatibus explicabo repudiandae fugit. Omnis sed veritatis ratione ab dicta eligendi. Labore minima doloremque pariatur et consequatur.

Career Advancement Opportunities

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.4%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.8%
  • JPMorgan 01 98.2%
  • Guggenheim Partners 01 97.7%
  • Morgan Stanley 07 97.1%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Moelis & Company No 99.4%
  • Morgan Stanley 01 98.8%
  • Evercore 01 98.2%
  • BMO Capital Markets 12 97.6%
  • Banco Santander 01 97.1%

Professional Growth Opportunities

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Moelis & Company No 99.4%
  • Evercore No 98.8%
  • Morgan Stanley 05 98.2%
  • JPMorgan No 97.7%
  • BMO Capital Markets 12 97.1%

Total Avg Compensation

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Vice President (14) $434
  • Associates (43) $259
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (8) $210
  • 2nd Year Analyst (22) $179
  • Intern/Summer Associate (13) $156
  • 1st Year Analyst (75) $151
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (67) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
3
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
4
kanon's picture
kanon
99.0
5
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
6
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
98.9
7
DrApeman's picture
DrApeman
98.9
8
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
9
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
10
Mimbs's picture
Mimbs
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”