Asset Management vs IBD (Longterm Career)

I'm currently finishing up my first year on Sell-side ER (after having done a grad-scheme) and have been thinking of a long-term career in either AM (LO or L/S) or IBD (specifically ECM).

Could someone please elaborate on the pro & cons of each if interested in a long term career? 

Points a care about; compensation, Stress on the Job and WLB

9 Comments
 

Went to a target school in Europe, did a SA in m&a at a MM bank thought private markets were borinf and hated the lifestyle and hence decided to do something different albeit public markets related.

Did a grad scheme at another bank in LDN were I rotated through the Bank (ER, Sales, ECM, Sales Trading). I didnt like the ecm lifestyle back then (leading ecm bank in europe hence worked from 9-midnight + multiple hours during the weekend).

Since I still wanted to have exit opps (e.g. corp dev or VC which more eyperienced coworkers of mine have exited to) I joined ER

I realized know that I either want to be a ECM senior (at a shitty or MM firm with a nice wlb) or buyside.

 
Most Helpful

My take.

LO AM:

Pros: If at a top mutual fund, will be paid well, wlb balance will be pretty good (between 50-70 hrs/wk, just a guess, depends on many factors)

Cons: outlook is uncertain, market rally the past decade has made LO a relative cakewalk but highly unsure this will persist. Might be looking at some outflows here. Greater uncertainty, more difficult entry at the real top shops and possibly lower comp in the future but expected to be still decent.

L/S AM:These market neutral strats are more typically found in hedge funds but there are some mutual funds that do L/S.

Pros: Might have higher performance based comp than LO at a MF, probably similar at an HF. These shops look for absolute returns so might be a good diversification for when the market is stagnant or experiences drawdowns. Might see more complex strategies compared to LO. Might continue to see good inflows going into the future

Cons: I think generally higher volatility assuming you're at a fundamental L/S fund I'm not actually sure. Wlb probably worse than at an LO.

Additional note: In both fundamental LO and L/S you're going to be pretty focused on a particular sector/strategy. It might take a long time to move up to Analyst level in an LO MF, which is when it typically starts to pay much better, almost feels like getting tenure in academia

IB is a pretty different animal altogether.

Pros: You have good exit options including LO, L/S AM, PE, Credit... Etc. It might be difficult (not impossible) to hop between those once you're in one esp between different asset classes. You also have all the other exit ops in Corp strat/Corp dev blablabla. Pay is great. Maybe even better than LO MF pay in the beginning (not like you will have time to spend it)

Cons: Hours are famously horrendous (80-120???), pay also dependent on performance of bank, you might have heard this year the bonus was shit but that's also true for most LO shops. (Hot take) To me the work of IB analysts sounds like it's uninteresting at best, dehumanizing at worst (end hot take). Definitely more intellectual freedom/ more stimulating work on the buyside. Pay discrepancies between IB and top AM start showing more as you rise through ranks.If you're highly unsure about where you want to land in the future, IB is a great route to keep your options open and not sacrifice much on pay.

 

Ut voluptatem quaerat cum impedit magnam in dolor. Deserunt quis quis aut in maiores porro asperiores. Aspernatur itaque libero maiores in asperiores eligendi. Eveniet molestiae corporis enim neque. Praesentium voluptate illum voluptatem et.

Sed illum laudantium rem non itaque blanditiis qui. Et atque vero possimus dolor eum. Saepe nemo nisi nesciunt amet. Aut explicabo omnis explicabo at mollitia hic sunt. Omnis non provident quasi et mollitia. Inventore et reiciendis ut possimus.

Eligendi dolor minus et laudantium voluptatem quam. Autem quia officiis quia voluptas. Tempora iste autem qui aut non. Et eos reprehenderit ea.

Ratione illo quis eveniet quo ea quia. Neque quidem neque qui ullam quas et ea. Sit quod ipsam corporis vero id.

Career Advancement Opportunities

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.4%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.8%
  • JPMorgan 01 98.2%
  • Guggenheim Partners 01 97.7%
  • Morgan Stanley 07 97.1%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Moelis & Company No 99.4%
  • Morgan Stanley 01 98.8%
  • Evercore 01 98.2%
  • BMO Capital Markets 12 97.6%
  • Banco Santander 01 97.1%

Professional Growth Opportunities

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Moelis & Company No 99.4%
  • Evercore No 98.8%
  • Morgan Stanley 05 98.2%
  • JPMorgan No 97.7%
  • BMO Capital Markets 12 97.1%

Total Avg Compensation

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Vice President (14) $434
  • Associates (43) $259
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (8) $210
  • 2nd Year Analyst (22) $179
  • Intern/Summer Associate (13) $156
  • 1st Year Analyst (75) $151
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (67) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
3
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
4
kanon's picture
kanon
99.0
5
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
6
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
98.9
7
DrApeman's picture
DrApeman
98.9
8
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
9
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
10
Mimbs's picture
Mimbs
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”