Equities vs HY/Leveraged Loans
Coming out of uni and I have two separate offers in asset management in London. One in equity research at a $100bn shop and one in leveraged finance (high yield/leveraged loans) at a top 10 global asset manager. I am considering which would be better in terms of long term career and compensation. Any insights?
100% comes down to your own preference. Personally, I'd always take HY over plain vanilla. Why? Because it gives you so much more variety. But there are countless arguments for equities, too.
Thanks so much
Bump
Bump
Bump
It ultimately comes down to what you are more interested in. If indifferent, I would recommend going down the leveraged finance path. Its more complex than equity and I've seen a number of my peers switch from leveraged finance to equities, but dont see much movement in the opposite direction. But it also depends on what platform you are investing in; e.g. is the $100bn shop in equities a mutual fund? Is the leveraged finance role at a CLO?
Qui quae itaque id in quisquam labore. Adipisci et omnis facere quia atque ea. At quo ex repellendus adipisci quaerat omnis distinctio et. Quos eos autem sed assumenda repellendus incidunt sed.
Et fugit sit natus. Sequi dolor itaque aut laudantium minus voluptas quod dolore. Odio fuga est voluptas.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...