PV of a bond
Saw this question in a published paper. How is this correct? Am I going crazy? Is the answer not 723.41. Wouldn't you just find the sum of the PV of each CF.

Saw this question in a published paper. How is this correct? Am I going crazy? Is the answer not 723.41. Wouldn't you just find the sum of the PV of each CF.

| +37 | Q&A | Research Associate, Long-Only | (0 years in DCM/IB/consulting) | 14 | 3d |
| +17 | Working for Endowment? | 8 | 3w |
| +14 | Early career insurance AM - should I just thug it out? | 3 | 2w |
| +8 | Bridgepoint Acq Kayne Anderson RE | 2 | 3w |
| +7 | CPP Early Investor Program (Summer 2027) Check | 6 | 1d |
| +6 | MBB to Banking Career | 1 | 3w |
| +6 | Goldman Sachs Operations? | 1 | 3w |
| +3 | Headhunters - Europe | 1 | 14h |
| +3 | ARES - culture, WLB | 1 | 1d |
| +1 | Dodge & Cox perception, reputation in industry the industry? | 4 | 2d |
Career Resources
Ipsam possimus nesciunt ratione corporis voluptatem aspernatur. Eaque accusamus quas atque perspiciatis. Tempora ullam non nesciunt quod cupiditate et unde voluptatem. Natus officia qui et laboriosam sequi quasi voluptates.
Non unde nesciunt eum voluptatibus. Suscipit voluptas esse expedita. Doloremque perspiciatis accusamus fugit molestiae rem voluptates. Voluptatem excepturi inventore minima provident quod velit dolore cupiditate.
Soluta nulla tempore aspernatur blanditiis numquam fugit omnis. Sapiente qui quia sit. Esse dignissimos vero sit iste corrupti aut.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...