PV of a bond
Saw this question in a published paper. How is this correct? Am I going crazy? Is the answer not 723.41. Wouldn't you just find the sum of the PV of each CF.

Saw this question in a published paper. How is this correct? Am I going crazy? Is the answer not 723.41. Wouldn't you just find the sum of the PV of each CF.

Career Resources
Suscipit est dignissimos est laboriosam non deserunt. Consequatur nemo in tenetur voluptatum eius et veniam.
Dolore pariatur sapiente voluptatem commodi. Doloribus cupiditate est facilis atque nisi. Enim aut labore consectetur quo velit sapiente. Porro magnam beatae architecto quibusdam eos dolore sint. Rem a dolorem veritatis nihil rem sint.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...