Switch to a US Long-Only RIA as a Consultant or Stay at a US BB?

I’m currently at a US bulge-bracket bank in Change/Product Management. I dislike the work and don’t want to build my career in this area. I’m expecting a promotion in Jan 2027 and recently took CFA Level III.

I’ve been offered a role at a ~$300m single-manager, long-only RIA on the Equity Research team. I’d research and pitch stocks, with the expectation that after ~1 year I’d get a small amount of capital to manage independently, with some variable comp linked to performance.

The catch: because the fund is US-based and I’m abroad, I’d have to work as a consultant/freelancer rather than a full-time employee.

Some context:

* Firm has ~15 employees, with only 4–5 in my country.
* Initial pay is roughly comparable to my current BB compensation, though take-home would be higher due to tax treatment.
* After my BB promotion, BB comp would be ~7–9% higher.
* No employee benefits at the RIA.
* Firm isn’t e-verified.
* Glassdoor is 2.9/5, with several reviews describing the founder/manager as toxic/difficult.
* I spoke to an analyst who has been there ~2 years. He was mostly positive about the work but said he hasn’t received a single recruiter outreach during his time there.
* The RIA work is far more aligned with my long-term goal of equity research/investing, and the lean structure could give me meaningful investment exposure early.

So I’m deciding between:

1. Stay at the BB: Get promoted in January, retain the BB brand/stability, and recruit for ER/AM/PE/Private Credit over the next 1–2 years. The downside is spending more time in a function I know I don’t want to pursue.

2. Take the RIA: Get directly relevant investing experience now, but accept the risks of being a consultant at a small/unknown firm, including weaker benefits, questionable online reputation, and potentially weaker exit opportunities.

TL;DR: I can stay at a US BB in a role I dislike, get promoted and recruit from there, or move now to a ~$300m long-only RIA where I’d actually do equity research and potentially manage capital after a year. The RIA is much more aligned with my goals but comes with consultant status, no benefits, a 2.9/5 Glassdoor rating, concerns about the founder, and potentially poor exits.

Would you take the relevant investing experience now, or stay at the BB, get promoted, and recruit from there?

5 Comments
 

Based on the most helpful WSO content, here’s how you should approach this decision:

Key Considerations:

  1. Alignment with Long-Term Goals:

    • The RIA role directly aligns with your goal of equity research and investing. You’d gain hands-on experience in stock research, pitching, and potentially managing capital, which is invaluable for transitioning into buy-side roles.
    • Staying at the BB in a role you dislike could delay your progress toward your ultimate goal, even with the promotion.
  2. Brand and Stability:

    • The BB brand carries significant weight in recruiting for ER/AM/PE/Private Credit. A promotion would further enhance your resume, making you a stronger candidate for top-tier opportunities.
    • The RIA, while offering relevant experience, is small and relatively unknown. The lack of recruiter outreach for current employees and the firm’s questionable Glassdoor reviews could limit your exit opportunities.
  3. Compensation and Benefits:

    • While the RIA’s initial pay is comparable (with better take-home due to tax treatment), the lack of benefits and consultant status introduces financial and job security risks.
    • At the BB, you’d retain full-time employee benefits and a more stable compensation structure, especially post-promotion.
  4. Work Environment:

    • The RIA’s Glassdoor rating (2.9/5) and reports of a toxic/difficult founder are red flags. A poor work environment could impact your performance, learning, and overall experience.
    • While you dislike your current BB role, the environment is likely more structured and professional, with clearer career progression.
  5. Exit Opportunities:

    • Staying at the BB allows you to leverage the brand and network for recruiting into top-tier ER/AM/PE/Private Credit roles.
    • The RIA’s lean structure and direct investing experience are valuable but may not carry the same weight with recruiters, especially if the firm’s reputation is questionable.

Recommendation:

If your ultimate goal is to transition into equity research or investing at a reputable firm, staying at the BB and leveraging the brand for recruiting is the safer and more strategic choice. The promotion in January 2027 will enhance your profile, and you can actively network and prepare for a move into ER/AM/PE/Private Credit within 1–2 years. While the RIA offers relevant experience, the risks (consultant status, no benefits, poor reputation, and limited exit opportunities) outweigh the potential benefits.

Alternative Approach:

If you’re determined to gain direct investing experience now, consider: - Negotiating with the RIA for better terms (e.g., a clearer path to full-time employment or improved compensation). - Using the RIA role as a stepping stone while actively networking and positioning yourself for a move to a more reputable buy-side firm within 1–2 years.

Ultimately, the BB provides a stronger platform for long-term career growth, even if it means enduring a role you dislike for a bit longer.

Sources: https://www.wallstreetoasis.com/forum/equity-research/career-ladder-equity-research-vs-investment-banking-a-definitive-guide-part-3?customgpt=1, A warning to those aiming for Sell Side Equity Research, https://www.wallstreetoasis.com/forum/investment-banking/qa-md-in-ma-and-capital-markets-with-bulge-bracket-and-boutique-experience?customgpt=1, Work/Life Balance: Equity Research vs. Investment Banking - (A Definitive Guide, Part 1)

I'm an AI bot trained on the most helpful WSO content across 17+ years.
 
Most Helpful

How long are you into your career, and what is your risk tolerance? The LO AM situation is a yellow flag at best in my view - it's a clear workaround to get cheaper offshore resources for a US based fund. You don't normally see that type of arrangement, at least I have not, for investment team resources - it's far more common for support, back office, etc. type functions where offshore contract resources can save significant money and, frankly, outperform domestic hires. If the other 4-5 are in the same situation, similar roles, and arrangement - that would at least give me a bit more comfort. Disclaimer - this may be entirely common outside my own little world in LO AM here in the US, so keep that in mind. This just screams re-classification risk and headaches, given it's literally an FTE role by any meaningful examination. 

My advice is to stay the course, hopefully pick up the promotion, get your CFA charter once you are eligible after passing LIII, and then continue full force recruiting throughout. There may also be other opportunities within your bank/company as you start to progress, and build a track record. Look for ways to automate your workflow, and accept that it's a path to where you want to be. 

 Back to the LO AM - about the only way this makes sense is that their track record is simply incredible, you will get real hands on experience, and you trust that this is a 'real' position - that won't simply be taken out in 12-18 months - although either way, you should be recruiting aggressively once you have the experience. I personally have a hard time seeing a firm hand over part of a book to someone who is an independent contractor - however you are closer to them than I am, and understand your own situation. 

 

Quia et in libero dignissimos aut vel. Quod optio voluptas quia animi ut ut. Minima blanditiis repudiandae placeat minus aliquam et aut. Laborum inventore atque eum necessitatibus sunt eum non. Maxime animi qui eum saepe saepe. Quos nisi sunt sapiente repudiandae aut sapiente nemo.

Dolore aut nobis reprehenderit quia enim recusandae. Sit quia repellendus ratione magni aut necessitatibus. In unde quaerat earum facere. Eveniet quam illo molestiae id. Est ea culpa quia amet.

Facilis eos illo sequi placeat ducimus fugiat voluptatem. Omnis molestiae harum accusamus odit iste non labore quasi. Et quidem enim repellat voluptatem omnis dolorem non numquam.

Career Advancement Opportunities

September 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.5%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.9%
  • JPMorgan 01 98.4%
  • Goldman Sachs 01 97.9%
  • Morgan Stanley 07 97.3%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

September 2026 Investment Banking

  • Moelis & Company No 99.5%
  • Morgan Stanley 03 98.9%
  • Evercore 01 98.4%
  • Banco Santander 02 97.9%
  • BMO Capital Markets 12 97.3%

Professional Growth Opportunities

September 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.5%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.9%
  • Morgan Stanley 07 98.4%
  • Goldman Sachs 01 97.9%
  • JPMorgan No 97.3%

Total Avg Compensation

September 2026 Investment Banking

  • Vice President (16) $429
  • Associates (51) $260
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (8) $210
  • 2nd Year Analyst (26) $182
  • Intern/Summer Associate (15) $159
  • 1st Year Analyst (84) $151
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (76) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
3
kanon's picture
kanon
99.0
4
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
5
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
6
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
98.9
7
DrApeman's picture
DrApeman
98.9
8
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
9
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
10
Mimbs's picture
Mimbs
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”