Am I Crazy for Wanting to Pursue Institutional Sales/IR Over Banking or S&T?

Currently an associate at a BB asset manager in NYC in a middle-office role with significant exposure to the institutional sales/IR teams. Several people from my team have made the move into those seats, so it’s a realistic path internally.

I’ve also considered trying to move internally to the investment bank, specifically capital markets or S&T. It would be a much tougher pivot given how competitive those seats are, but I think it’s possible with enough networking and technical preparation.

However, the more I think about it, the more appealing institutional sales/capital formation at a top asset manager or alternatives shop becomes.

My thinking is that as alternative managers continue to grow and fundraising becomes increasingly competitive, the ability to raise capital and maintain institutional relationships will become even more valuable. At the right platform, it seems like the long-term compensation potential can be substantial, WLB is generally better than banking, and it’s a much more natural pivot from my current seat.

A lot of my friends are in banking and doing well, so it’s easy to feel like I should be pursuing the more traditional or “prestigious” Wall Street path. But I’m starting to question whether spending years trying to break into banking/S&T is actually the best move, especially if institutional sales/capital formation could offer comparable upside with a better lifestyle.

I’ve also recently been getting interviews for some fairly lucrative IR roles at well-established alternative managers. While these opportunities are attractive, my long-term goal would be to move into a true institutional fundraising/sales seat rather than primarily servicing existing LP relationships. I’m curious how difficult that transition is in practice. Is starting in a more traditional IR role at a top fund a good stepping stone into capital formation, or is there a risk of getting pigeonholed into the servicing side of the business?

I guess my main questions are:

1. Am I overestimating the long-term compensation potential and career trajectory of institutional fundraising relative to traditional banking/S&T?
2. How realistic is the transition from IR/client servicing into true institutional sales/fundraising? Is this a common progression?
3. Would you prioritize getting into a top alternatives platform in an IR capacity and working toward sales, or holding out for a direct institutional sales opportunity?

The combination of compensation potential, lifestyle, and a relatively accessible pivot from my current role almost seems too good to be true, which makes me wonder what I’m overlooking.

Would be interested to hear from anyone working in institutional sales, capital formation, or IR, particularly at larger alternative asset managers. Curious whether I’m looking at this the right way or missing some major drawbacks.

5 Comments
 

Based on the most helpful WSO content, your thought process seems well-reasoned, and you're not crazy for considering institutional sales/IR over banking or S&T. Here's a breakdown of your questions and concerns:

1. Long-term compensation potential and career trajectory of institutional fundraising vs. banking/S&T

  • Institutional Sales/IR: At top alternative asset managers, institutional fundraising roles can offer substantial long-term compensation, especially as alternative managers grow and fundraising becomes more competitive. The ability to raise capital and maintain relationships is highly valued, and top performers in this space can earn significant bonuses. Additionally, the work-life balance (WLB) is generally better than in banking or S&T.
  • Banking/S&T: While banking and S&T can offer higher compensation at the top levels (e.g., managing director), the path is more grueling, with longer hours and higher stress. S&T, in particular, is facing challenges like automation and shrinking desks, which could limit long-term opportunities unless you're in a niche or highly specialized role.

2. Transition from IR/client servicing to institutional sales/fundraising

  • This transition is realistic but not guaranteed. Starting in a traditional IR role at a top fund can be a stepping stone into institutional sales, but there is a risk of being pigeonholed into client servicing. To mitigate this, you should:
    • Proactively seek opportunities to work on fundraising initiatives.
    • Build strong relationships with the institutional sales team and demonstrate your ability to contribute to capital formation.
    • Highlight your sales acumen and ability to build new relationships, not just service existing ones.

3. Prioritizing IR at a top alternatives platform vs. holding out for direct institutional sales

  • IR at a top platform: This can be a great entry point, especially if the platform has a strong reputation and offers exposure to fundraising. It’s often easier to pivot internally from IR to institutional sales than to break directly into sales from a middle-office role.
  • Direct institutional sales: If you can secure a direct institutional sales role, it would align more closely with your long-term goal. However, these roles are highly competitive, and holding out for one might delay your career progression.

Key Considerations:

  • Lifestyle and Fit: Institutional sales/IR roles often provide a better lifestyle than banking or S&T, which aligns with your priorities.
  • Networking and Skills: Success in institutional sales requires strong interpersonal skills, relationship-building, and the ability to articulate complex investment strategies—skills you seem to possess based on your current role and aspirations.
  • Pigeonholing Risk: To avoid being stuck in a servicing role, focus on platforms that emphasize fundraising and provide clear pathways to institutional sales.

Final Thoughts:

Your instincts about the growing importance of institutional fundraising and its potential for compensation and lifestyle balance are spot on. If you’re already getting interviews for lucrative IR roles at top alternative managers, that’s a strong signal that you’re on the right track. Prioritize platforms with a clear path to institutional sales, and don’t underestimate the value of starting in IR if it positions you for long-term success in fundraising.

Sources: Q&A: MBB, BB S&T+IB, Top MBA, US/Global, Sales and Trading - A Comprehensive Guide, Why choose Sales and Trading over Investment Banking?, Kennedy School of Government (and schools of the like)

I'm an AI bot trained on the most helpful WSO content across 17+ years.
 
Most Helpful

no, i don't think you're crazy at all... 

did the buyside thing for a few years before switching to fundraising. best move of my career i hated equity investing as an actual job to wake up to everyday. I have maybe 3 friends in seats that i think that are attractive on the buyside and even then i wouldn't go for it, personally

Here, my role is both being a RM and fundraiser. Hours are generally 9-6 usually but starting to hit the road to meet with LPs/prospects. This comes with more responsibility so definitely spending more evenings speaking to Asian clients at 8pm. Have been traveling a little more than 1nce/month but expect that to go up as we approach year-end.

Was told I should expect 300k all in this year but "it's really up to you", i.e., if I actually raise assets and clients reach out to me and I start QB'ing processes, it should be above that. I would assume revenue generators, i.e., people who can identify prospects, raise XXXmn or so independently are closer to 450-500k all in. Seniors in fundraising at my firm are in the 7 figure range, all of them. 

I've been pretty vocal to mgmt about wanting to stay and become a senior. Firm is growing a lot and we run lean so I think there's a lot of opportunity to progress. Also helps that our performance has been pretty good. It'd suck to be in this seat for unsellable investment capabilities...

 

No - you aren't crazy, and I think it's a great option. A few thoughts on your questions above: 

  1. You aren't underestimating the opportunity for compensation, only the path to it - it's more volatile than other roles. Good years can be a bonanza, and bad years can be as bad as zero on a bonus or being shown your walking papers. Overall comp still follows revenue/production - new asset gathering/clients always get paid the most, and on down through those who simply engage/manage relationships. You are also at the mercy of your firm's ability to deliver on performance and the products themselves - either a few really strong ones, or a wide menu that gives you multiple access points to any given relationship you manage or pursue. 
  2. Many firms have it setup that you start more junior, managing relationships and/or servicing, and eventually take over higher value relationships along with business development opportunities. Some places split them out more discretely - BD's vs. RM's - and then often by channel, i.e. LP's or institutions, consultants, RIA's, etc.  The ultimate question is can you work with people, manage a relationship, and ultimately monetize that relationship - if you can do that credibly, sky is the limit for the most part. 
  3. The key is picking the right firm and client base, that gives you the best shot at being successful. That's more important than anything else - as this is a hard role. Consultants, RIA's, and institutional investors all have virtually infinite options nowadays - building relationships takes time, and often sales cycles are pretty long relatively speaking. 
 

Labore ducimus itaque cupiditate. Cum atque dolorem cumque sed et sequi nihil et.

Possimus dolores eos voluptate eum. Earum quia reprehenderit autem sequi placeat natus ullam sed. Rerum expedita harum sed reiciendis aut occaecati sed. Modi corrupti ut aut non iusto. Incidunt impedit explicabo omnis dignissimos.

Et minima consequatur quidem. In qui natus possimus dolorem eaque itaque quos. Voluptatum impedit necessitatibus non ea vel. Non impedit deserunt reprehenderit dolor.

Voluptate tenetur voluptate enim ratione. Amet quia quae delectus.

Career Advancement Opportunities

November 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.5%
  • Moelis & Company 01 99.0%
  • JPMorgan 01 98.4%
  • Guggenheim Partners 02 97.9%
  • Morgan Stanley 06 97.4%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

November 2026 Investment Banking

  • Moelis & Company No 99.5%
  • Morgan Stanley 02 99.0%
  • Evercore 01 98.4%
  • Banco Santander 02 97.9%
  • BMO Capital Markets 13 97.4%

Professional Growth Opportunities

November 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.5%
  • Moelis & Company 01 99.0%
  • Morgan Stanley 05 98.4%
  • Goldman Sachs 01 97.9%
  • JPMorgan No 97.4%

Total Avg Compensation

November 2026 Investment Banking

  • Vice President (16) $429
  • Associates (57) $264
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (8) $210
  • 2nd Year Analyst (29) $183
  • Intern/Summer Associate (16) $161
  • 1st Year Analyst (84) $151
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (77) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
3
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
4
kanon's picture
kanon
99.0
5
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
98.9
6
DrApeman's picture
DrApeman
98.9
7
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
8
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
9
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
10
Mimbs's picture
Mimbs
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”