May 16, 2023
 

Currently associate at MF PC in underwriting (execution) and I believe the difference is firm dependent. 

At my firm it's mostly just title and there is a lot of crossover, however inherently PM is more middle-office in that you role is not so much analysing prospective investments and building models, it's ensuring the opportunities that do arise, fit properly into the portfolio for a given fund allocation. 

So definitely still involved however more from the sidelines. Like I said though, in my firm the difference is simply semantics and so you may find there is little difference in practice.

 

Portfolio management is quarterly reporting and coverage plus maybe mix of underwriting ops type work on incrementals for existing names.

Underwriting is more interesting (you figure out if you want to do new deals and diligence them and make memos) vs portfolio management is entering historical financials each quarter and paraphrasing the MD&A, maybe quarterly valuations, maybe some underwriting on small incrementals etc

 

I'm currently in a PM role for a distressed credit fund and my firm runs its a bit differently than other firms. We handle any amendments, upsizes, periodic IC updates, and most importantly, any restructurings. I probably wouldnt want to be in a similar role for a large sponsored lender, but my firm is typically non-sponsored LMM special situations and were honestly closer to structured equity / distress vs PC. 

Key points for me before I accepted were: 1) were considered part of the investment team and not back/middle office, 2) we have a voice and pseudo approval rights over new investments and are brought in on the 85yd line to get spun up on the deal, 3) Comp is within a fair toss of the underwriting team, their target bonuses are 10-15% higher than ours but the base salaries and carry allocations are the same at each level. 

 

Going to depend on the firm, but my old shop which was more of a direct lender, the PM type team which did primarily restructurings / ran assets that they took the keys on significantly outplaced the underwriting team in exits. All in respect of moving into private equity style seats, moving up market, and moving to distressed funds.

 
Most Helpful

Pay is less than an underwriting role, but to be blunt, focusing solely on pay is the wrong move. Sure it means lower $ in the short term, but, port mgmt at a place that is not fund management like Carlyle has, is truly front office relationship based, credit and legal work thats invaluable ability, you're so in demand you have no idea... you'll learn WAY more than an UW role, because you deal with a lot of real problems, think quick on your feet, differentiate yourself, and are the go to person at most places. You'll have autonomy to develop ways to track credit risk and speak to C suites in FO. You'll be more indispensable than an UW person who is a dime a dozen. I found constant challenges differentiates you to know so many different things. If you do both, as I've seen banks do,  your life is gonna suck if when shit hit the fan. If you have great exposure, unless the people and team are toxic  its a mistake to dip. And to be clear, big funds like carlyle, ares, hps.... I would rather cut off my foot than be there when  shit ultimately hits the fan.

Unless there's a 6 figure difference with guarantees, you'll be moving from an in demand silo to a high probability of not getting a job because everyone in IB is now vying for it. Then again I know in biased as I love this niche and done it at multiple firms learning a fuckton

 

Vero labore nisi deserunt sit. Delectus aliquid est beatae optio velit. Ipsa soluta quos quia dolores nihil nulla pariatur aliquam.

Est maiores nisi doloremque praesentium eum. Eum assumenda voluptas nostrum dolor cum et recusandae. Exercitationem voluptatem et ipsam eaque et maiores. Aut nemo nesciunt eum possimus delectus voluptatem. Fuga provident nostrum nostrum reiciendis. Officiis libero velit fugit corrupti tempora. Quasi pariatur autem consequatur sed voluptas.

Temporibus vitae iste delectus maxime suscipit ut. Aperiam veritatis quae atque. Quibusdam asperiores non totam ipsum aspernatur a. Unde numquam laboriosam dolorem. Eveniet nulla doloremque atque cupiditate doloribus ipsam.

At rem est libero dolore dolores quia eum. Explicabo reiciendis ea corporis praesentium dolores praesentium. Et doloremque omnis dolorum omnis in.

Progress is impossible without change...

Career Advancement Opportunities

May 2024 Investment Banking

  • Jefferies & Company 02 99.4%
  • Lazard Freres No 98.9%
  • Harris Williams & Co. 25 98.3%
  • Goldman Sachs 17 97.7%
  • JPMorgan Chase 04 97.1%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

May 2024 Investment Banking

  • Harris Williams & Co. 18 99.4%
  • JPMorgan Chase 10 98.9%
  • Lazard Freres 05 98.3%
  • Morgan Stanley 07 97.7%
  • William Blair 04 97.1%

Professional Growth Opportunities

May 2024 Investment Banking

  • Lazard Freres 01 99.4%
  • Jefferies & Company 02 98.9%
  • Goldman Sachs 17 98.3%
  • Moelis & Company 07 97.7%
  • JPMorgan Chase 05 97.1%

Total Avg Compensation

May 2024 Investment Banking

  • Director/MD (5) $648
  • Vice President (21) $373
  • Associates (91) $259
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (14) $181
  • Intern/Summer Associate (33) $170
  • 2nd Year Analyst (68) $168
  • 1st Year Analyst (205) $159
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (148) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”