Feb 27, 2025

Seeking clarity on secured vs non-secured debt in corporate direct lending

I always read online that private credit (direct lending) is typically in the form of senior secured loans, but I'm confused on why it's considered secured. Direct lending is separate from ABF which of course is secured by the borrower's assets (receivables, inventory, equipment, etc.), but in a traditional direct lending deal, isn't the debt usually just protected by covenants like max. leverage, min. liquidity, etc.? I'm not understanding where the security comes from / why most fund managers' websites refer to a "senior secured direct lending strategy" - wouldn't that just make it an asset-backed loan? Thanks in advance for the help!

5 Comments
 

In direct lending, the term "senior secured" refers to the fact that the loan is backed by a lien on the borrower's assets, giving the lender a claim on those assets in the event of default. This is distinct from unsecured debt, where the lender has no such claim and relies solely on the borrower's creditworthiness and covenants for protection.

Here's the breakdown:

  1. Secured Nature of Direct Lending:

    • In traditional direct lending, loans are often secured by a general lien on the borrower's assets, which may include receivables, inventory, equipment, or other tangible/intangible assets. This lien ensures that the lender has priority in recovering their funds if the borrower defaults.
    • While it may not be as specific as asset-based financing (ABF), where loans are directly tied to specific assets (e.g., receivables or inventory), the "security" in direct lending comes from this general claim on the borrower's assets.
  2. Covenants vs. Collateral:

    • Covenants like maximum leverage or minimum liquidity are additional protective measures but do not replace the secured nature of the loan. They are designed to monitor the borrower's financial health and prevent risky behavior.
    • The "secured" aspect refers to the legal claim on assets, while covenants are contractual obligations that guide the borrower's financial conduct.
  3. Why It's Not Just an Asset-Backed Loan (ABL):

    • ABL is a subset of secured lending where the loan is specifically tied to and limited by the value of certain assets (e.g., receivables or inventory). In contrast, direct lending typically involves a broader lien on the company's assets, not just specific ones.
    • This broader lien provides flexibility for both the borrower and lender, making it distinct from the more restrictive nature of ABL.
  4. Why Fund Managers Emphasize "Senior Secured":

    • Fund managers highlight "senior secured" to emphasize the lower risk profile of their strategy. Being senior means they are first in line for repayment, and being secured means they have a claim on assets, reducing potential losses in a default scenario.

In summary, the "secured" in senior secured direct lending comes from the lien on the borrower's assets, even if it's not as narrowly defined as in asset-backed financing. This security, combined with covenants, makes direct lending an attractive risk-adjusted return strategy for private credit funds.

Sources: Overview of Leveraged Finance, Alternative Lenders & the End of Risk Taking for Banks - Opportunity or Risk?, Overview of Leveraged Finance, So you want to work in CRE Debt? Here are the options..., Private Debt/Direct Lending Exit Opps?

I'm an AI bot trained on the most helpful WSO content across 17+ years.
 
Most Helpful

It's senior secured because you are typically the most senior debt and your debt is secured by all assets of the company (and a pledge of the equity). However, the assets of the company are not going to provide a significant recovery/coverage on your loans and you are making them based on an assessment of cash flows (and the enterprise value associated with them). 

ABL typically is looking at specific assets and lending at an advance rate (i.e. 80% on A/R, 50% on inventory, etc). 

If you applied those ratios to a typical LBO (varies dramatically by sector) then coverage is only ~10-40% of debt typically. Whereas for an ABL deal, there will be >100% asset coverage. You can lose money in an ABL if the actual liquidation values of the assets are substantially below what you underwrote, but its typically harder, thus ABL is generally cheaper. There are also some exotic ABL that will go up to ~100% (or sometimes a little higher) of asset value or will lend on something more illiquid like Intellectual Property/Brand Value, but then it becomes almost a hybrid analysis and you will think about the cash flow dynamics of the business too. Those ABL deals price wider and are typically only sought by companies that are in/entering/exiting distress and have low liquidity and limited other access to capital.

 

What AKBOS said. 

It is less about your actual "collateral" position and more about your ranking among other creditors. Being in the senior position means you control the proceedings in the event of default and any lender holding the same security as you in junior position follows your lead. As AKBOS noted, by virtue of having a lien on the trading assets; an ABL lender is structurally superior since they, by design, can be liquidated and paid out in 90 days leaving you with whatever is left. If you're doing senior secured with the idea that you'll actually just go take possession of your collateral and hold a fire sale in the event of default... you're doing it wrong. 

"And where we had thought to be alone we shall be with all the world"
 

Et amet ipsam quia voluptatem eius. Inventore dolorem qui labore similique quia dolore omnis. Est rem fuga consectetur itaque placeat omnis doloribus et. Natus fugiat ab sit aliquid.

Aut deserunt molestias error totam dicta natus asperiores. Rem sint dolores doloremque et quis corrupti. Minima optio voluptatum fugit laboriosam dolores molestias consequatur.

Career Advancement Opportunities

July 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.4%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.9%
  • JPMorgan 01 98.3%
  • Guggenheim Partners 01 97.7%
  • Morgan Stanley 07 97.1%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

July 2026 Investment Banking

  • Moelis & Company No 99.4%
  • Evercore No 98.8%
  • Morgan Stanley 01 98.3%
  • BMO Capital Markets 13 97.7%
  • Banco Santander 01 97.1%

Professional Growth Opportunities

July 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.4%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.9%
  • Morgan Stanley 06 98.3%
  • Goldman Sachs 01 97.7%
  • JPMorgan 01 97.1%

Total Avg Compensation

July 2026 Investment Banking

  • Vice President (15) $434
  • Associates (46) $258
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (8) $210
  • 2nd Year Analyst (22) $179
  • Intern/Summer Associate (13) $156
  • 1st Year Analyst (80) $150
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (73) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”