Jun 20, 2026

Structured Lending at Banks

How do people perceive structured lending / backleverage / financing desks at big banks these days?

Goldman and DB probably have broader mandates than just backlevering for fund s - guess most of the other banks are quite similar.

6 Comments
 

Based on the most helpful WSO content, structured lending and financing desks at big banks are generally perceived as specialized and valuable, but their roles and mandates can vary significantly across institutions. Here's a breakdown:

  1. Broader Mandates at Certain Banks:

    • Banks like Goldman Sachs and Deutsche Bank are noted for having broader mandates. They don't just focus on backleveraging for funds but may also engage in more complex and diverse financing solutions, including structured products and bespoke lending strategies.
  2. Specialization and Expertise:

    • These desks often require a deep understanding of legal, structural, and credit risk elements. Professionals in these roles are exposed to a variety of debt instruments, including esoteric types like RMBS, CMBS, and ABS, which demand a high level of technical expertise.
  3. Market Perception:

    • Structured lending is seen as a niche but critical area within banking. It offers exposure to complex transactions and can be a stepping stone to roles in private credit, direct lending, or even distressed investing. However, it may not have the same "sex appeal" as roles in trading or hedge funds, which are often more glamorous in the eyes of many.
  4. Regulatory Environment:

    • The regulatory landscape, shaped by frameworks like Basel III and Dodd-Frank, has influenced how banks approach structured lending. These regulations have pushed banks to offload riskier assets and focus on capital-efficient lending, creating opportunities for alternative lenders to step in.
  5. Career Prospects:

    • For those interested in structured lending, it can be a lucrative and intellectually rewarding career path. The blend of legal, financial, and operational challenges makes it a unique space, and the skills gained are highly transferable to other areas of finance.

In summary, structured lending desks at big banks are respected for their technical rigor and strategic importance, though their appeal may vary depending on individual career goals and interests.

Sources: Alternative Lenders & the End of Risk Taking for Banks - Opportunity or Risk?, What are the different types of Credit?, A Banking Primer, Top firms for distressed investing. Solving for brand and deal experience more than ability to growth within the organization.

I'm an AI bot trained on the most helpful WSO content across 17+ years.
 

Hi OP.

There's NAV lending obviously, but then there is also "I am a private credit fund buying X-hundred million dollars of mortgage forward flow and I want financing to securitize it once I aggregate a big enough book of the stuff"-type repo/warehousing. If this stuff is super high quality/liquidly securitizable, you might give a great interest rate in exchange for being the lead bank when they go to market to securitize it.

Can you speak a little more to what kind of lending you are thinking of? Or are you yourself trying to figure that out/not sure

 

Hey thanks much. Imagine all the banks do it a little differently, but think the name of the game is usually just corporate credit financing, may it be a straight warehouse or via credit derivatives backed by liquid or private loans and bonds. I have done this at a bank and overall feels like a boring/ stagnant business that mostly underwrites counterparty risk or manager risk.

Now that what I know and am curious about is I gradually learned some banks do have a broader mandate, and I bet people on those desks most likely have a better shot at actual credit funds. The issue I have is for one I have never seen a proper exit from my bank into investing nor have I spent too much time with people who are doing similar things at other banks to learn their takes / experiences.

直指人心,見性成佛
 

Debitis sit nihil alias sunt. Sed quas magni repellat consequatur recusandae sequi. Excepturi ea nulla possimus voluptatem voluptas perferendis aut.

Ut unde doloribus mollitia non quia numquam at. Temporibus ducimus qui libero. Suscipit omnis numquam non neque magnam eveniet.

Atque voluptatem molestiae vel aut excepturi enim autem. Et est dolores nihil eos delectus error. Voluptas unde nisi voluptatibus.

直指人心,見性成佛

Career Advancement Opportunities

August 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.4%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.9%
  • JPMorgan 01 98.3%
  • Morgan Stanley 08 97.8%
  • Goldman Sachs 02 97.2%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

August 2026 Investment Banking

  • Moelis & Company No 99.4%
  • Evercore No 98.9%
  • Morgan Stanley 01 98.3%
  • Banco Santander 02 97.8%
  • BMO Capital Markets 12 97.2%

Professional Growth Opportunities

August 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.4%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.9%
  • Morgan Stanley 06 98.3%
  • Goldman Sachs 01 97.8%
  • JPMorgan 01 97.2%

Total Avg Compensation

August 2026 Investment Banking

  • Vice President (16) $429
  • Associates (48) $259
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (8) $210
  • 2nd Year Analyst (25) $178
  • Intern/Summer Associate (14) $159
  • 1st Year Analyst (83) $151
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (75) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
kanon's picture
kanon
99.0
3
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
4
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
5
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
6
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
98.9
7
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
8
DrApeman's picture
DrApeman
98.9
9
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
10
bolo up's picture
bolo up
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”