Jun 16, 2024

UMM PC Case Study

I have a case study next week for a Large UMM PC shop that focuses mainly on Direct Lending. I will be given 3h and a CIM to build a model and a couple of investment recommendations slides. 

I've done a case study in the past for another UMM PC but format was different as I had 48h and was given much more materials (CDD, FDD, ...). As such, I have the following questions:

  1. Is it fine to use Historicals to get to your Structuring EBITDA if you are only provided a CIM (and not a FDD)? 
  2. How do you decide leverage capacity of a business beyond looking at comps? 
  3. How do you decide on the call structure you will be using? Is this applicable for bonds only?
  4. What do you sensitize here given IRR / MoIC and Entry / Exit Multiples aren’t that relevant in PC?

Would be great to get some inputs, I will definitely provide feedback / insights on the case study once done.

Cheers

5 Comments
 

Based on the most helpful WSO content, here are some insights to address your questions for the UMM PC case study:

  1. Using Historicals to Get to Structuring EBITDA:

    • Yes, it is fine to use historicals to get to your structuring EBITDA if you are only provided a CIM. Historical financials can give you a good sense of the company's performance trends, margins, and cash flow generation. This approach is commonly used when more detailed diligence materials like FDD are not available.
  2. Deciding Leverage Capacity Beyond Looking at Comps:

    • Beyond looking at comps, you can assess the leverage capacity of a business by:
      • Analyzing Cash Flow: Look at the company's ability to generate free cash flow, as this will determine its capacity to service debt.
      • Balance Sheet Strength: Evaluate the balance sheet to understand existing debt levels and liquidity.
      • Industry Factors: Consider industry-specific leverage norms and cyclicality.
      • Historical Performance: Assess historical leverage ratios and coverage ratios (e.g., interest coverage, debt/EBITDA).
  3. Deciding on the Call Structure:

    • The call structure is typically more relevant for bonds, but in the context of direct lending, you might consider:
      • Prepayment Penalties: To protect against early repayment risk.
      • Covenants: To ensure the borrower maintains certain financial metrics.
      • Amortization Schedule: To manage repayment timelines and reduce risk.
  4. Sensitizing Given IRR / MoIC and Entry / Exit Multiples Aren’t That Relevant in PC:

    • In private credit, you might focus on:
      • Default Risk: Sensitize for different default scenarios and recovery rates.
      • Interest Rate Sensitivity: Assess how changes in interest rates impact the borrower's ability to service debt.
      • Cash Flow Variability: Sensitize for different levels of cash flow generation and its impact on debt servicing.
      • Covenant Breaches: Evaluate the impact of potential covenant breaches and the lender's remedies.

These points should help you prepare effectively for your case study. Good luck, and looking forward to your feedback and insights once it's done!

Sources: How to analyse business models?, https://www.wallstreetoasis.com/forum/private-equity/then-and-now-compbanker?customgpt=1, THEN and NOW: @CompBanker, Private Credit Resources and Prep, Q&A - Mid-Market Turnarounds

I'm an AI bot trained on the most helpful WSO content across 17+ years.
 
Most Helpful

Distinctio natus soluta enim sit omnis quidem veniam. Non velit est sed quaerat eum id quos non. Cumque ut tenetur illo expedita distinctio ducimus. Earum quo eos voluptate laboriosam.

Libero sint provident praesentium amet et. Placeat iste ut a et. Modi et cum magnam beatae maxime fugiat aut ea. Fugit et repudiandae laboriosam.

Quis esse earum minus. Id quasi distinctio blanditiis repellendus. Non est optio quaerat delectus sed officia. Quod et qui quis doloribus.

 

Fugiat voluptatem rerum at et. Neque doloremque molestias accusantium ut. Et autem beatae non.

Est nihil consequatur nihil ut et voluptatibus. Laudantium id accusamus voluptatem nihil dolore asperiores recusandae. Amet debitis praesentium quo consectetur voluptatem vero. Rerum corporis illum cumque eos vel sit. Voluptatem tempore mollitia optio odio.

Asperiores dolor repellendus natus est. Ut aut aut saepe rerum architecto ut qui.

[Comment removed by mod team]

Career Advancement Opportunities

August 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.5%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.9%
  • JPMorgan 01 98.4%
  • Goldman Sachs 01 97.8%
  • Morgan Stanley 07 97.3%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

August 2026 Investment Banking

  • Moelis & Company No 99.5%
  • Morgan Stanley 02 98.9%
  • Evercore 01 98.4%
  • Banco Santander 02 97.8%
  • BMO Capital Markets 12 97.3%

Professional Growth Opportunities

August 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.5%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.9%
  • Morgan Stanley 07 98.4%
  • Goldman Sachs 01 97.8%
  • JPMorgan No 97.3%

Total Avg Compensation

August 2026 Investment Banking

  • Vice President (16) $429
  • Associates (50) $259
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (8) $210
  • 2nd Year Analyst (26) $182
  • Intern/Summer Associate (14) $159
  • 1st Year Analyst (84) $151
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (75) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
kanon's picture
kanon
99.0
3
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
4
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
5
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
6
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
7
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
98.9
8
DrApeman's picture
DrApeman
98.9
9
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
10
numi's picture
numi
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”