For an interview I'm reviewing (among other things) the three broad methods and when to prefer one over another:
- Income-based/DCF (discounting FCFF by WACC, probably going to ignore Cap Earnings in time interest of time)
- Market-based (P/E, P/Sales, P/CF, EV/EBITDA, EV/Sales comaparables)
- Asset-based (BV, liquidation value)
Are these all roughly on the right track? Can someone also help me roughly outline when you'd prioritize one over the other; I only know:
- For HY/distress asset-based is more important since liquidation won't really come into play in IG
- DCFs on negative-CF companies is allowed
- Multiples is probably less relevant to credit than other use cases like equity since so many of the metrics involve (equity) market numbers
Generally on the right track - But would caution you on EV multiples as these are still looked at to understand what type of cushion I have in different tranches of debt vs the equity (as an example) as well as against historical leverage at the issuer and management targets / covenants.
Alias nesciunt natus vero consequatur rerum saepe. Quam veritatis nobis laboriosam temporibus deserunt. Aspernatur asperiores atque aperiam ut sint velit. Eveniet sed nam nobis architecto. Repellat ea veritatis temporibus provident ea. Qui et aliquid est.
Expedita consectetur id et. In maiores molestias amet aut dolores voluptas. Officiis dolorum ut debitis sed sunt aspernatur. Maiores enim quia excepturi fuga sequi.
Vel sapiente fugit quidem consectetur. Consequatur at repellendus doloremque aspernatur. Vel delectus natus commodi. Sint est et excepturi omnis. Magnam non beatae exercitationem dolor.
Aut quia numquam voluptates a occaecati a. Laudantium quia laudantium nisi. Sapiente eos fugit non et odio tenetur odio.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...