How is Econometrics Applied in ER?

Hi,

I am very curious as to what linear regression techniques are used by equity research analysts and for what purpose. Is there a resource devoted to this topic?

6 Comments
 
Most Helpful

In my experience of working on four separate teams on the sellside (and a stint at a LO AM), I have never seen anybody use linear regression in their analysis.  Speaking more broadly on econometrics (and finance academia in general), the vast majority of it isn't used in practice. 

The most useful things I learned from school that I was actually able to apply on the job were mostly topics covered in accounting.   The only things I've ever used from the finance classes I took were literally simple DCFs where our cost of equity was more of a plug than something we rigorously calculated.

 

Regression isn't used for that. The goal of linear regression is to draw a trendline over existing data. It doesn't actually predict new values. Standard econometrics doesn't deal with predicting values in general. You could make predictions (forecasting) based on financial econometrics with models like ARMA & ARIMA or with models in the comp sci department using different ML algos e.g. RNN, LSTM, GRU etc.

 

dickthesellsider got it basically completely right.  

The only bit i'd add is that for a lot of large cap / mature companies, they issue pretty regular guidance and sometimes even give quarterly guidance.  95% of sellside analysts will just model the short / medium term to company guidance +/- a few percentage points to satisfy whatever narrative they're pushing (i.e. buy or sell rating).  And for the out years, they'll basically do what dickthesellsider said and just model some arbitrary steady-state growth.  Realistically, nobody is going to look at your out year assumptions unless you're way off of consensus.

Also, just in case you think i'm criticizing analysts for following guidance, i'm not.  These companies have armies of FP&A analysts who have way more granular information than any external observer who crunch the numbers to help come up with whatever high-level guidance there is (e.g. we expect revenue growth of 3-5% in xyz segment).  Unless you have a real fundamental view for why you think the company is overestimating or underestimating their prospects, you should almost never deviate from near term guidance simply because you're much more likely to be wrong.

 

I rarely see fundamental forecasts done using regression, but regression is used often enough in charts where they correlate valuation multiple with some fundamental metrics and use a high R^2 to justify explanatory power of a spurious relationship. 

You see it in SaaS research reports at a lot of shops where they relate say, NTM growth rate with EV/rev multiple of all the pub SaaS names and draw a line between all the data points and say "look, 70% R^2, so if something is growing at 30%, it should trade around this rev multiple". 

Forecasting growth / margin is not supposed to be that scientific, it's more like "look, historically this industry can do 3% volume growth and can increase price 2%, so revenue can go up at most 6% each year and you just use that during your forecast period, and the best company in the industry can do 30% EBITDA margin, so if you are bullish, you have to believe your company can converge that margin gap in a reasonable number of years. If your name has 5% EBITDA margin right now, is it realistic / has any company in the space ever able to get to 30% EBITDA margin in 5 years from 5%? No? Then you can't count on 30% EBITDA margin as part of your thesis."

 

Quas voluptas ad adipisci praesentium rerum eum soluta. Illum aspernatur at sunt explicabo non alias. Architecto placeat laudantium maiores rerum id voluptatem repellat.

Career Advancement Opportunities

August 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.4%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.9%
  • JPMorgan 01 98.3%
  • Morgan Stanley 08 97.8%
  • Goldman Sachs 02 97.2%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

August 2026 Investment Banking

  • Moelis & Company No 99.4%
  • Evercore No 98.9%
  • Morgan Stanley 01 98.3%
  • Banco Santander 02 97.8%
  • BMO Capital Markets 12 97.2%

Professional Growth Opportunities

August 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.4%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.9%
  • Morgan Stanley 06 98.3%
  • Goldman Sachs 01 97.8%
  • JPMorgan 01 97.2%

Total Avg Compensation

August 2026 Investment Banking

  • Vice President (16) $429
  • Associates (47) $258
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (8) $210
  • 2nd Year Analyst (25) $178
  • Intern/Summer Associate (14) $159
  • 1st Year Analyst (83) $151
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (74) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
3
kanon's picture
kanon
99.0
4
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
5
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
6
DrApeman's picture
DrApeman
98.9
7
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
98.9
8
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
9
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
10
Jamoldo's picture
Jamoldo
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”