Necessity of reaching steady state in a DCF
If I'm forecasting a company to have negative FCF in Y10, could I instead limit the DCF to 5 years (thereby increasing the accuracy of the forecast) and use an EV/EBITDA exit multiple given the company has positive EBITDA?
If it's not clear, I'm basically asking whether it's okay to use exit multiples on companies that haven't reached steady state by the end of the forecasting period. Thanks.
Hi liambdesmond, whoops, looks like nobody chimed in here.... maybe one of these discussions below is relevant:
More suggestions...
You're welcome.
Nemo repellendus eum numquam expedita. Quasi esse alias odit at. Ipsam illum commodi iusto porro voluptatum. Rem est numquam nemo aut dolor. Quasi non deserunt nulla voluptas.
Magni est fugit hic cum hic rerum dolorem in. Facilis iste sed commodi molestiae quaerat ea laborum. Ducimus sed incidunt aut quos quasi. Aliquam vel minus facere omnis omnis id. Ut nostrum et nobis possimus autem qui.
Facilis commodi quaerat adipisci delectus. Odit quam repellendus et optio. Modi ut error et quos. Voluptatem architecto omnis saepe et animi libero. Qui dolorum rem consequatur ducimus cum excepturi tempore est.
Blanditiis repudiandae corrupti quam optio nesciunt eos. Voluptatibus provident autem officiis suscipit minima. Unde temporibus debitis nisi quod est architecto placeat.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...