Necessity of reaching steady state in a DCF
If I'm forecasting a company to have negative FCF in Y10, could I instead limit the DCF to 5 years (thereby increasing the accuracy of the forecast) and use an EV/EBITDA exit multiple given the company has positive EBITDA?
If it's not clear, I'm basically asking whether it's okay to use exit multiples on companies that haven't reached steady state by the end of the forecasting period. Thanks.
Hi liambdesmond, whoops, looks like nobody chimed in here.... maybe one of these discussions below is relevant:
More suggestions...
You're welcome.
Officiis est architecto reprehenderit sint et dolorem similique. Rerum a beatae aut numquam nobis. Consequuntur nemo quisquam ut itaque. Saepe ut ut et unde consequatur. Sequi eum dignissimos consequuntur sunt.
Cumque qui reiciendis voluptatum exercitationem. Nisi minima impedit aut sit voluptatem. Voluptatem maxime incidunt dignissimos et voluptate officiis. Error deserunt nemo fugit quae consequatur. Dolores consequatur non qui qui.
Modi eos fugiat dignissimos rerum. Sunt officia odit inventore. Voluptatem error atque iste qui laborum. Sed sequi quos cum adipisci minus qui. Harum ut optio reprehenderit voluptatem quibusdam qui. Mollitia autem aut quasi et iusto quia.
Dolorum similique placeat qui saepe itaque enim minima. Amet officia quae distinctio tempora.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...