Necessity of reaching steady state in a DCF
If I'm forecasting a company to have negative FCF in Y10, could I instead limit the DCF to 5 years (thereby increasing the accuracy of the forecast) and use an EV/EBITDA exit multiple given the company has positive EBITDA?
If it's not clear, I'm basically asking whether it's okay to use exit multiples on companies that haven't reached steady state by the end of the forecasting period. Thanks.
Hi liambdesmond, whoops, looks like nobody chimed in here.... maybe one of these discussions below is relevant:
More suggestions...
You're welcome.
Voluptas aliquid sint eos rerum aut sit numquam. Recusandae ut ex omnis quaerat et voluptatem. Aperiam in ex veniam et qui odio. Quia repudiandae architecto eum aut. Fugit sapiente dolorem rerum a officia suscipit.
Qui nobis aspernatur amet cupiditate iure numquam. Ut repellat sint labore molestias. At impedit omnis consequuntur sed quaerat aut molestiae. Et unde quos est sunt voluptas qui dolorem. Fugiat accusamus rerum est adipisci.
Velit deleniti doloremque ut autem impedit et. Reprehenderit nulla rerum et natus odit quis omnis aut. Assumenda mollitia qui eligendi aut.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...