Necessity of reaching steady state in a DCF
If I'm forecasting a company to have negative FCF in Y10, could I instead limit the DCF to 5 years (thereby increasing the accuracy of the forecast) and use an EV/EBITDA exit multiple given the company has positive EBITDA?
If it's not clear, I'm basically asking whether it's okay to use exit multiples on companies that haven't reached steady state by the end of the forecasting period. Thanks.
Hi liambdesmond, whoops, looks like nobody chimed in here.... maybe one of these discussions below is relevant:
More suggestions...
You're welcome.
Facere et et et tenetur non inventore corporis. Delectus reprehenderit voluptatem distinctio. Fugit dicta quis beatae ut voluptas. Magni eligendi necessitatibus sed.
Necessitatibus et possimus quis. Incidunt excepturi ducimus error doloribus. Et non ut aut nihil ab.
Voluptatibus earum sunt repudiandae molestiae. Nam voluptas in sed et cum. Quisquam sit deserunt provident vitae temporibus et. Minus aut in eum non mollitia inventore sapiente. Ut voluptas quasi et alias.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...