sellside ER and the "sell" recommendation

i was wondering: i understand that a role of the sellside equity analyst is also "marketing" the company he/she covers and therefore can't place many "sell" recommendations unless he/she wants to lose access to the management but, given that the major part of the money inflow comes from the buyside, shouldn't the analyst be a little bit more "brave" when it comes down to choose the recommendation?

i am well aware that many buyside professionals use the sellside analysts not for the quality of their financial models inputs but rather for the accuracy of information they acquire but still, isn't the buy/hold/sell present to mean something?

5 Comments
 
Best Response

Sell-side analysts usually cover 1 sub-sector, and generally evaluate those companies on a relative basis. So they might not pick-up on the over/under-valuation of their vertical.

And analysts almost never make broader calls about the market - just about everything should have been rated "buy" in mid-2009.

There are aren't that many straightforward "sells". You might think "this stock is a awful unless XYZ event occurs." Well, there is probably a fund manager somewhere who is betting on that event occurring. So, for that guy, it is a "buy". As an analyst, you have a broad audience, so that stock might be a hold.

Buy/Sell/Hold ratings are really a gross oversimplification. It is almost impossible to put a company neatly into one of 3 buckets. You need to read the note, and ideally talk to the analyst. And if you're going to do all that, I'd say you should do your own work.

I would defer to analysts on a few niches (energy, financials, biotech/pharma, NatRes). But then you are also relying on the analyst to get you out of the stock... it's not a great situation to be in.

 

mm i see. just a little follow-up: why would you defer to analysts on energy, financials, biotech and natural resources and not on technology? i know the explanation might sound obvious to you but, as this post proves, i am still inexperienced!

 

Tech is honestly much easier. You don't need to understand exactly how a router works to understand CSCO. If you can understand their competitive positions, that's good enough. Most also trade on earnings (and the ones that don't tend to trade on perception).

The industries I mentioned require expertise. Biotech investing depends on you being able to understand the results of clinical trials and the FDA approval process, not to mention the end market for the product.

Financials and Energy/NatRes have their own issues. Models, metrics, and accounting are completely different. As a financials analyst, I can jump into a consumer goods niche and ramp up in a week or so. The reverse cannot happen. Some O&G niches (e.g. drilling rigs) are almost impossible to model effectively without some sector expertise.

I'd also say utilities analysts deserve some credit. The modeling isn't bad, but they need to understand regulation and the dynamics of public-private partnerships.

 

Consequatur animi fugiat tenetur qui et laboriosam. Porro et voluptates temporibus ullam a sequi maxime. Voluptas recusandae omnis eos sint inventore. Temporibus odit repudiandae vitae quam iusto eveniet. Praesentium omnis rerum nemo beatae. Exercitationem corrupti rerum nam sunt voluptatem. Quia sequi qui est ut sit.

Quia asperiores fuga eos qui autem et dolor incidunt. Vel qui exercitationem voluptatem quasi iusto accusamus. Consequuntur numquam atque dolorem provident eveniet nemo.

Accusamus omnis et et quos velit incidunt quia. Eos dolorem unde mollitia magni reiciendis soluta. Sunt ea repudiandae quae rem adipisci. Enim eligendi impedit porro officia. Nihil architecto sed iusto repudiandae dolorum quia hic. Repellendus atque reprehenderit dignissimos quod adipisci veniam nihil. Illum doloribus animi possimus aut quia sequi quisquam minima.

Career Advancement Opportunities

September 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.5%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.9%
  • JPMorgan 01 98.4%
  • Morgan Stanley 07 97.9%
  • Goldman Sachs 02 97.4%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

September 2026 Investment Banking

  • Moelis & Company No 99.5%
  • Morgan Stanley 02 98.9%
  • Evercore 01 98.4%
  • Banco Santander 02 97.9%
  • BMO Capital Markets 12 97.4%

Professional Growth Opportunities

September 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.5%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.9%
  • Morgan Stanley 05 98.4%
  • Goldman Sachs 01 97.9%
  • JPMorgan No 97.4%

Total Avg Compensation

September 2026 Investment Banking

  • Vice President (16) $429
  • Associates (53) $259
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (8) $210
  • 2nd Year Analyst (28) $184
  • Intern/Summer Associate (16) $161
  • 1st Year Analyst (84) $151
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (76) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
3
kanon's picture
kanon
99.0
4
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
5
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
6
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
7
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
98.9
8
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
9
DrApeman's picture
DrApeman
98.9
10
Linda Abraham's picture
Linda Abraham
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”