Valuation Question - Valuation test from my interview?

might be a very easy question for many of you guys but i appreciate any serious replies :

I get this valuation test from my interview and I had some troubles with it. The test ask me to calculate both Enterprise Value and equity value.

The information I got is one company wishes to raise $100 million in equity in order to fund a factory, which will be constructed in 2010 and will cost $200 million (remaining $100 million will be funded through debt at an interest cost of 6%). Then I have the company's sales forcast included variable and fixed cost. I also have enough information to calculate the WACC. However, I don't know D&A, CapEx, change in opearting assets. Should I just make assumpition and calculate the DCF anyway?

I also have EV/EBITDA, P/E multiples from comparable table. but based on my calculation, the company's 2010 EBITDA and net earnings are both negative. so how do I use multiples to value the company?

Help please!

Thanks.

 
Best Response

For depreciation, just depreciate the new asset (the factory) straight line over a period of time. Make some assumptions about salvage value and useful life that you can defend.

For changes in net working capital, you have the sales, so you can back into the accounts receivable via an assumption for DSO. You also have the COGS (variable costs) so you can back into inventory and AP with assumptions for DPO and inventory turns.

For CapEx, you can look at what the return on the factory asset is now, and looking at the sales forecast, back into the necessary capital expenditures to keep ROA roughly flat - it shouldn't change that much over time in a stable industry.

For the company's EBITDA, that really shouldn't be much of a calculation. In your case sales - variable exp. - fixed exp. = EBITDA. Is this really negative per what they've given you? I seriously hope you're not including $200mm in capital expense in your 2010 EBITDA calc.

At this point you should have everything you need to do a decent DCF with defendable assumptions. That's your Enterprise value. Subtract the $100mm debt and you have your Equity value.

I would then use the multiples as a sniff test and if you're way off the grid you may want to rethink some of your assumptions.

Hope that helps.

 

jhoratio, thx for the reply.

the case was a mini case so lots of information is missing. I did make assumptions about D&A, CapEx, etc; However, I assumed % revenue for D&A rather than depreciate the factory (guess i was wrong on that one).

For the EBITDA and Earnings, the factory has no sales in 2010 but still occur $100mm fixed cost, so the EBITDA and earnings are both negative. I didn't include the $200MM for the EBITDA calculation. I just used Operating income (EBIT) add back D&A that I assumed. The 2011's EBITDA and Earnings are both positive, and I have comparable tables for 2011 and 2012 as well. However, i think it is irrelevant as we are looking for their enterprise value and equity value in 2010.

I guess I basically got the DCF right, but still not sure how to use the multiples.

Thank you for your detailed answers though. Really appreciate it

 

tricky that they made 2010 sales 0, are you sure this is right? Well if 2010 profit numbers are negative, then you certainly can't apply multiples to them. I would apply your comparable multiples to 2011 and footnote about your assumption of 2010 being irrelevant.

Using 2011 isn't the correct methodology for a 2010 EV calculation, but its still something as 2011 multiples are lower than 2010 multiples as they account for increased EBITDA/earnings projections. Again, this is not something you normally do but in your circumstance it might make sense.

Having just a DCF analysis is kind of weak for valuation, as you want multiple ranges to come to a more defensible number.

 

Sunt aperiam tenetur delectus vitae facere ex. Alias iusto amet laboriosam ex quisquam aut aliquid dolores. Facilis assumenda accusantium id aut autem. Quasi quas sed harum inventore magni. Consequatur quas molestiae beatae excepturi incidunt nesciunt. Ipsum aut quos fuga ducimus veniam reiciendis qui.

Voluptates recusandae aut et. Cumque et consequuntur velit officiis eos. Natus voluptatem optio velit dolor rerum quas modi.

Career Advancement Opportunities

June 2024 Investment Banking

  • Jefferies & Company 02 99.4%
  • Perella Weinberg Partners New 98.9%
  • Lazard Freres 01 98.3%
  • Harris Williams & Co. 24 97.7%
  • Goldman Sachs 17 97.1%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

June 2024 Investment Banking

  • Harris Williams & Co. 19 99.4%
  • JPMorgan Chase 10 98.9%
  • Lazard Freres 05 98.3%
  • Morgan Stanley 05 97.7%
  • Moelis & Company 01 97.1%

Professional Growth Opportunities

June 2024 Investment Banking

  • Lazard Freres 01 99.4%
  • Jefferies & Company 02 98.9%
  • Perella Weinberg Partners 18 98.3%
  • Goldman Sachs 16 97.7%
  • Moelis & Company 05 97.1%

Total Avg Compensation

June 2024 Investment Banking

  • Director/MD (5) $648
  • Vice President (22) $375
  • Associates (93) $259
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (14) $181
  • Intern/Summer Associate (33) $170
  • 2nd Year Analyst (69) $168
  • 1st Year Analyst (206) $159
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (149) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”