10 Comments
 

Because making money in tech tends to be just high-beta + avoiding blowups, whereas biotech (measured by XBI) is low/moving beta by its own nature. ARKK/ARKG is a joke and shouldn't be compared to real biotech investors.

They (Baker) have been significantly above average at calling the outcomes of clinical trial events. It's also possible Baker had a limited net exposure and wasn't actually impacted as badly as others. But you don't pay them to outperform in environments like these. You pay them to call the trial readouts better than the next guy. 

The past couple years was easy to pick on if you're evaluating biotech investors, especially if they're net long, but it's misleading because the correlation between biotech and everything moves a lot. XBI was selling off long before everything else, for example, and it sold off again because it became correlated with everything else when rates went up (it is a rate sensitive sector for sure). 

At the FoF level, they are significantly different products. You'd probably want both Baker and Tiger in your fund of funds over the long run, and you'd be more upset with Tiger right now than Baker unless Baker's hit rate into catalysts was shitty over the past 12 months. 

 

My snark may have been unwarranted, I don’t know biotech that well or know the space. My main pt was XBI was as bubbling as speculative tech so I think we have to handicap the perf on the up cycle by the drawdown - on this site I think people give too much credit to the funds long secular trends. That said I’ve written elsewhere that you should judge tech guys vs their mandate and I don’t know enough about their track record to speak to nuance. Retract my negativity, we’ll see when the dust settles

 
Most Helpful

Labore facere rem dolores similique nihil quia non facere. Quos odit tenetur reiciendis. Provident dolorem ut tempora dolores corrupti.

Career Advancement Opportunities

May 2026 Hedge Fund

  • Point72 99.0%
  • D.E. Shaw 98.1%
  • Citadel Investment Group 97.1%
  • AQR Capital Management 96.2%
  • Magnetar Capital 95.2%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

May 2026 Hedge Fund

  • Magnetar Capital 99.0%
  • Millennium Partners 98.1%
  • D.E. Shaw 97.1%
  • Blackstone Group 96.1%
  • Citadel Investment Group 95.1%

Professional Growth Opportunities

May 2026 Hedge Fund

  • AQR Capital Management 99.1%
  • Point72 98.1%
  • D.E. Shaw 97.2%
  • Citadel Investment Group 96.2%
  • Magnetar Capital 95.3%

Total Avg Compensation

May 2026 Hedge Fund

  • Portfolio Manager (9) $1,648
  • Vice President (27) $464
  • Director/MD (12) $423
  • NA (9) $320
  • Engineer/Quant (86) $288
  • 3rd+ Year Associate (26) $284
  • Manager (4) $282
  • 2nd Year Associate (32) $253
  • 1st Year Associate (76) $192
  • Analysts (240) $181
  • Intern/Summer Associate (28) $146
  • Junior Trader (5) $102
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (282) $96
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
kanon's picture
kanon
99.0
3
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
4
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
5
DrApeman's picture
DrApeman
98.9
6
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
98.9
7
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
8
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
9
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
10
Jamoldo's picture
Jamoldo
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”