Can Someone help me understand how do L/S IG and HY work at MM Platforms
As title suggests, I am curious about how do pods differ from other HFs in terms of Long/short investment grade and high yield?
On IG, I am curious what are you really betting on since it is mainly a bet on interest rate and sector rotation
On HY, I am curious given how tight the spread is today, do you just buy things at 90c and sell at 95c?
I am pretty ignorant on this topic so apologies if this is a really basic question...
Interested
bump.
can anyone also comment on risk limits, target returns net long/short, liquidity and sourcing (thinking about primary as source of alpha vs secondary) for liquid credit?
Bump
bump
In MMs, we're operating with significantly more portfolio construction vs traditional L/S credit strategies. Our IG book maintains gross exposure typically hovering around 300-400% with strict net parameters of +/- 50%, emphasizing RV dislocations, not macro exposure. Like most FI guys, heavily on technical catalysts - basis trades, cap arbitrage, and event-driven special situations. You'll see funds that are actively involved in new issuance, particularly focusing on concessions versus secondary curves. The ability to actively trade around these positions with the MM cost of execution has allowed us to capture significant alpha in what many view as a compressed spread environment. We maintain strict VaR parameters, typically keeping duration exposure between 0-2 years net.
Regarding the high yield strategy, spreads are at historically tight levels but we're identifying compelling RV opportunities across the capital structure. Rather than simple carry trades, more pair trades. Position sizing typically 200-300 basis points for core long positions, with shorts sized at 100-150 basis points. The portfolio maintains strict stop-loss parameters at both the position and portfolio level
The key differential in our platform model versus traditional credit-focused hedge funds is our ability to rapidly adjust positioning based on changing technicals while maintaining robust risk - but as this website knows, our turnover metrics significantly exceed street so yes, tend to capitalize on short-term dislocations (but by virtue also are over-exposed to it)
How does that VaR limit translate into risk limitations / drawdown as a % of your gross book?
Great Q - take a pod's gross exposure of 300-400%, apply the VaR % to this. For instance, if your VaR is 1% on a gross exposure of 300%, the potential loss would be 3% of your gross book
Corporis suscipit velit et autem tempora accusamus et. Libero voluptas culpa porro repellendus pariatur error. Sed amet laudantium quis. Consectetur quibusdam velit et delectus. Perspiciatis ducimus sit mollitia dolores.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...