Citadel FCAT test

Hey all, I’m trying to calibrate how much time to put into preparing for the Citadel FCAT. I’ve taken similar platform-based modeling tests before, but I keep seeing mixed messages about what Citadel actually focuses on.

This is what I think is correct, but please sanity-check me:

- It’s a web-based assessment, right? Not a downloadable Excel file?

- I assume it’s a pretty straightforward 3-statement build, but is it more like:
a) a bare-bones plug-and-play forecast with light adjustments,
or
b) a more detailed revenue / cost driver build?

-I’ve heard people say there is NO DCF, is the output more like:
“here are the numbers, interpret them,”
rather than a valuation/recommendation?

- How granular are the schedules? e.g., do they expect WC schedules, debt roll-forwards, or do most people skip them under the time cap?

Not asking for anything proprietary, more trying to avoid prepping the wrong way.

If anyone who’s done it can give some guidance on what to expect, how much detail the test actually requires, and what tripped people up, that’d be hugely appreciated.

24 Comments
 

Based on the most helpful WSO content, here's what you need to know about preparing for the Citadel FCAT test:

  1. Web-Based Assessment: Yes, the FCAT is typically a web-based platform assessment rather than a downloadable Excel file. This means you’ll likely be working within a controlled environment with limited external tools or resources.

  2. 3-Statement Build: The test generally involves building a 3-statement model, but the level of detail can vary. From previous threads, it seems to lean more towards option (b): a detailed revenue and cost driver build rather than a simple plug-and-play forecast. This means you should be comfortable with creating thoughtful assumptions and linking them across the financial statements.

  3. No DCF: Many candidates have noted that the test does not include a DCF. Instead, the focus is on interpreting the numbers and understanding the business dynamics. You may be asked to identify key risks, drivers, and provide insights based on the model output rather than delivering a valuation or investment recommendation.

  4. Granularity of Schedules: The level of granularity expected can depend on the time constraints. While some candidates mention skipping detailed schedules like working capital (WC) or debt roll-forwards due to time pressure, others suggest that having a clear income statement with well-thought-out revenue and cost builds is more critical. The key is to prioritize what adds the most value to your analysis within the time limit.

  5. Common Pitfalls:

    • Time Management: Many candidates run out of time, so practice working efficiently under pressure.
    • Overcomplicating the Model: Focus on clarity and accuracy rather than building a perfect, overly detailed model.
    • Lack of Business Insight: Beyond technical modeling, Citadel values your ability to quickly understand the business, identify key drivers, and articulate risks and opportunities.

Preparation Tips:

  • Practice Detailed Revenue/Cost Drivers: Get comfortable with building these from scratch and linking them across the financial statements.
  • Focus on Interpretation: Be ready to explain your assumptions and the implications of your model outputs.
  • Time Yourself: Simulate the test environment to improve your speed and efficiency.
  • Skip Non-Essentials: If time is tight, prioritize the income statement and key drivers over granular schedules.

Good luck! Remember, Citadel is looking for both technical proficiency and business acumen, so balance your preparation accordingly.

Sources: Citadel (Surveyor) Case Study/Modeling Test, Updated SIE/79/63 Advice - 2023

I'm an AI bot trained on the most helpful WSO content across 17+ years.
 

Thanks thats helpful! How detailed revenue / cost driver build (2/3 lines vs proper segment breakdown)? Do you know if quarterly or annually? Also assume revolver plug?

 
Most Helpful

If you flunk FCAT you either have shit modeling skills or got tripped up in some of their notations. For instance I recall one ratio where traditionally I’d have done an average in denominator, I think this needed a point in time. I find the web interface annoying too but it’s not a deal breaker. Just be conscious that their formula conventions differ. 

 

Found that CFAT this year requires a full segment by segment revenue build. Also there is simple valuation at the end and ratio work to be completed to get full score.

 

Hey did you ever get ahold of the Hycalibre models for P72 and Citadel. Happy to pay, please DM! Can’t seem to get website access anymore either

 

associate2026

Did the software require you to have your camera on? Mine has been broken and deciding whether to borrow a friends laptop. Thanks!

No camera 

 

Qui dignissimos numquam culpa fugiat dolorum dolorem impedit. Ex nostrum illo quidem qui ab illum distinctio. Maxime consequatur autem iusto et omnis. Quia qui id et rerum. Sit exercitationem numquam ea dolorem id.

Quidem non eum esse quos quisquam sequi. Eum vel illo quaerat esse similique et deleniti. Quo aut inventore nihil expedita. Perferendis est rem aliquam neque. Numquam tempora est aut rerum maiores est repellendus vitae.

Career Advancement Opportunities

June 2026 Hedge Fund

  • Point72 99.0%
  • D.E. Shaw 98.1%
  • Citadel Investment Group 97.1%
  • AQR Capital Management 96.2%
  • Magnetar Capital 95.2%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

June 2026 Hedge Fund

  • Magnetar Capital 99.0%
  • Millennium Partners 98.1%
  • D.E. Shaw 97.1%
  • Blackstone Group 96.1%
  • Citadel Investment Group 95.1%

Professional Growth Opportunities

June 2026 Hedge Fund

  • AQR Capital Management 99.1%
  • Point72 98.1%
  • D.E. Shaw 97.2%
  • Citadel Investment Group 96.2%
  • Magnetar Capital 95.3%

Total Avg Compensation

June 2026 Hedge Fund

  • Portfolio Manager (9) $1,648
  • Vice President (27) $464
  • Director/MD (12) $423
  • NA (9) $320
  • Engineer/Quant (86) $288
  • 3rd+ Year Associate (26) $284
  • Manager (4) $282
  • 2nd Year Associate (32) $253
  • 1st Year Associate (76) $192
  • Analysts (240) $181
  • Intern/Summer Associate (28) $146
  • Junior Trader (5) $102
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (282) $96
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
3
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
4
kanon's picture
kanon
99.0
5
DrApeman's picture
DrApeman
98.9
6
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
7
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
8
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
9
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
98.9
10
numi's picture
numi
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”