Does equity and credit HF pods have the same drawdown limits?

Does equity L/S and credit HF pods tend to have the same drawdown limits? Seems quite BS given equity daily volatility is 5-10% and you can hit drawdown on a very bad day, whereas credit tends to move only a few bps if at all with almost zero volatility in principal. Is it that much easier being a credit PM than an equity L/S one these days? 

13 Comments
 

Based on the most helpful WSO content, drawdown limits for equity L/S and credit hedge fund pods can differ significantly due to the inherent differences in volatility and risk profiles of the asset classes they manage.

Equity L/S strategies typically face higher daily volatility, often in the range of 5-10%, which can lead to hitting drawdown limits more quickly during adverse market conditions. On the other hand, credit strategies generally experience much lower volatility, with movements often limited to a few basis points, making it less likely for credit PMs to hit drawdown limits as quickly as their equity counterparts.

This disparity in volatility does suggest that managing a credit book might be "easier" in terms of avoiding drawdowns, but it doesn't necessarily mean the role is less challenging. Credit PMs often deal with complexities like bespoke deal structures, liquidity constraints, and the need for deep credit analysis. Additionally, credit PMs may have to navigate longer investment horizons and less frequent trading opportunities compared to equity L/S PMs.

In summary, while credit PMs might have an advantage in terms of lower volatility and reduced risk of hitting drawdown limits, the challenges in credit investing are different and require a distinct skill set.

Sources: Credit - Pod Shop/MM vs. Distressed/Special Sits HF, Q&A: Equity Analyst & Trader (VP level) at $12+ bn Hedge Fund, Credit Hedge Fund opportunities, Hedge fund volatility strategy PM returns and drawdowns, Credit Hedge Fund opportunities

I'm an AI bot trained on the most helpful WSO content across 17+ years.
 

You can easily see multi-mm daily swings in credit pods. Something you buy at 10c can go to par, and something you buy at 90c can file for bankruptcy. Given worse liquidity you can also see pretty wild gaps in spicier names, and as the above comment mentioned trade sizing is generally not small. To say bonds move a few bps a day is a gross misstatement…

 

Analyst 3+ in HF - RelVal

You can easily see multi-mm daily swings in credit pods. Something you buy at 10c can go to par, and something you buy at 90c can file for bankruptcy. Given worse liquidity you can also see pretty wild gaps in spicier names, and as the above comment mentioned trade sizing is generally not small. To say bonds move a few bps a day is a gross misstatement…

This cannot be a serious post, bonds at 10c do not suddenly go to par and bonds trading at 90c do not suddenly go to 0. Of course this has happened but to use this as an example of “volatility” in credit is absurd.


IG, on a typically volatile day, might move 10bps, max, with generic HY moving maybe a point.


The volatility in credit is nowhere near the vol in equity. The volatility comes from the leverage being used in credit.

 

The "volatility" of high-yield/IG credit is a JOKE compared to the volatility in equities. HY bonds maybe dip 3-5% (300-500 bps) on a black swan event like tariff wars (April) or COVID (2020), while equities (L/S) basically can move 10%+ up or down in a day with almost ZERO news. When black swan macro event hits, equities routinely crack 30% or more in a single session. The difficulty of L/S equity is FAR higher than credit and there is no exaggeration here. 

 

Omnis qui et voluptate est. Dolores saepe ratione adipisci quas voluptatibus dolore sit porro. Dolorum officiis ut quis est consequatur omnis unde ea.

Est dolorem voluptatum et dolore rerum. Voluptas fuga necessitatibus ea illum vitae et quo. Qui dignissimos ut reiciendis ipsum.

Eaque voluptatum delectus nesciunt ex. Qui optio vero ullam consequatur debitis. Autem ea ipsa recusandae accusantium.

Career Advancement Opportunities

June 2026 Hedge Fund

  • Point72 99.0%
  • D.E. Shaw 98.1%
  • Citadel Investment Group 97.1%
  • AQR Capital Management 96.1%
  • Magnetar Capital 95.1%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

June 2026 Hedge Fund

  • Magnetar Capital 99.0%
  • D.E. Shaw 98.0%
  • Blackstone Group 97.0%
  • Citadel Investment Group 96.0%
  • Millennium Partners 95.0%

Professional Growth Opportunities

June 2026 Hedge Fund

  • AQR Capital Management 99.0%
  • Point72 98.1%
  • D.E. Shaw 97.1%
  • Citadel Investment Group 96.2%
  • Magnetar Capital 95.2%

Total Avg Compensation

June 2026 Hedge Fund

  • Portfolio Manager (9) $1,648
  • Vice President (27) $464
  • Director/MD (12) $423
  • NA (9) $320
  • Engineer/Quant (86) $288
  • 3rd+ Year Associate (26) $284
  • Manager (4) $282
  • 2nd Year Associate (32) $253
  • 1st Year Associate (76) $192
  • Analysts (242) $181
  • Intern/Summer Associate (29) $145
  • Junior Trader (5) $102
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (282) $96
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”