L/S vs the rest

I've been scrolling through the HF section of WSO for a while now and it seems the only/main strategy talked about is L/S equity. Why is that? Is it because that's the new mainstream thing or other strategies like credit, macro etc , are too technical or difficult?

17 Comments
 
Most Helpful

It's perceived to be the most fun / spoken about. Its had a renaissance in the past 5 years with the "industrialisation of alpha" from the large mm risk models churning out hsd/ldd returns regardless of market environment - all whilst the tiger cubs struggled in 21/22 when tech beta took a beating on surprise inflation. On the flipside the l/s fundamental strategy feels like it's at capacity. Aum levered to l/s equities is unlikely to 2x from here. Crowding is an issue. Seems like the large mm platforms are looking to scale though 3rd party allocations and other uncorrolated strategies. I'm in the peak pod camp but arguably the same was said 15 years ago before they had their golden moment. 

 
  • AUM is very high, opportunities more abundant
  • It's got a lower "barrier to entry' compared to other areas, meaning IB, ER, maybe S&T, and other people can all join compared to something like global macro or distressed that requires a more niche specific background
  • fun
  • Performance has been great over the past couple years
  • Other large fund types(mainly quant) tend to other areas of the internet like reddit or quantnet

 

No. They're 2 different areas. Quant is really overused as a term. Everything will slowly converge to more "quant" just because we're in an era of data, and for that reason I don't recommend getting a finance/econ degree anymore, or at least getting a math/stats/data science/cs minor with it. But quant itself won't replace L/S. Just move it. 

 

Voluptatum accusamus atque sunt iste dolorum. Ad et omnis sint dicta magnam. Cum reprehenderit cupiditate earum nostrum assumenda. Quisquam et corporis aspernatur necessitatibus est esse. Modi id hic ut doloremque occaecati fuga.

Excepturi cum quam nihil ipsam repudiandae. Perferendis cupiditate dolorem et unde.

Career Advancement Opportunities

July 2026 Hedge Fund

  • Point72 99.0%
  • D.E. Shaw 98.1%
  • Citadel Investment Group 97.1%
  • AQR Capital Management 96.2%
  • Magnetar Capital 95.2%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

July 2026 Hedge Fund

  • Magnetar Capital 99.0%
  • D.E. Shaw 98.0%
  • Blackstone Group 97.1%
  • Citadel Investment Group 96.1%
  • Millennium Partners 95.1%

Professional Growth Opportunities

July 2026 Hedge Fund

  • AQR Capital Management 99.0%
  • Point72 98.1%
  • D.E. Shaw 97.1%
  • Citadel Investment Group 96.2%
  • Magnetar Capital 95.2%

Total Avg Compensation

July 2026 Hedge Fund

  • Portfolio Manager (9) $1,648
  • Vice President (27) $464
  • Director/MD (12) $423
  • NA (9) $320
  • Engineer/Quant (86) $288
  • 3rd+ Year Associate (26) $284
  • Manager (4) $282
  • 2nd Year Associate (32) $253
  • 1st Year Associate (77) $191
  • Analysts (242) $181
  • Intern/Summer Associate (29) $145
  • Junior Trader (5) $102
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (282) $96
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
3
kanon's picture
kanon
99.0
4
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
5
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
98.9
6
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
7
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
8
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
9
DrApeman's picture
DrApeman
98.9
10
Mimbs's picture
Mimbs
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”