Market neutral equity capital efficiency

Wondering if anyone can provide insight into how capital efficient market neutral long/short equity is, from a balance sheet/ margining perspective. 

Now that rates are materially higher than 0, I'd like to understand what the capital considerations are to running one of these books. I understand futures margining much better. 

For example, at a MM you are typically tasked with running an $XXX million GMV book in equities, let's say 500M. Typically you are looking to return 2-3% on that GMV. Certainly you are not required to post the aggregate 500M of gross exposure from the balance sheet as a margin requirement, what are the typical percentages as a function of GMV required to post as "margin capital" for these books? Is that number materially affected by the fact that rates have risen?

5 Comments
 
 
Most Helpful

Agree except the spread in the middle is bigger than 10 bps
 

longs fund at OBFR + margin and shorts rebate at OBFR - borrow cost. 
 

If your treasury department has a lot of bargaining power and you don’t short HTBs, then you’re lucky if that spread is 50bps. More likely it would be 55-60bps. 
 

don’t forget that (at least some and maybe all) pods charge pms on underlying equity too which helps neutralize funding costs at a fund level. 
 

also - the larger pods net off internal exposures to save financing costs to the street but pms pay that cost regardless of if it is paid externally. so that’s one more way that the business reduces overhead costs.  
 

 

Gotcha thanks for the replies! What about margining requirements (as opposed to borrowing/financing costs)? E.g. how much capital do you have to post with the broker of you are running an $XXX million GMV book? I understand that the financing most likely offsets but certainly if you are running bigger GMV you will have to post more dollars in margin? I know there is Regulation T which requires brokerage accounts to post 50% of their long exposure in margin, but not sure if that applies only to retail or also to institutional accounts.

 

Ex quam nam et iure sint. Pariatur est corporis nulla qui odit. Dolorem animi qui minima neque quod velit explicabo. Soluta illo delectus aspernatur ullam asperiores.

Career Advancement Opportunities

July 2026 Hedge Fund

  • Point72 99.0%
  • D.E. Shaw 98.1%
  • Citadel Investment Group 97.1%
  • AQR Capital Management 96.2%
  • Magnetar Capital 95.2%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

July 2026 Hedge Fund

  • Magnetar Capital 99.0%
  • D.E. Shaw 98.0%
  • Blackstone Group 97.1%
  • Citadel Investment Group 96.1%
  • Millennium Partners 95.1%

Professional Growth Opportunities

July 2026 Hedge Fund

  • AQR Capital Management 99.0%
  • Point72 98.1%
  • D.E. Shaw 97.1%
  • Citadel Investment Group 96.2%
  • Magnetar Capital 95.2%

Total Avg Compensation

July 2026 Hedge Fund

  • Portfolio Manager (9) $1,648
  • Vice President (27) $464
  • Director/MD (12) $423
  • NA (9) $320
  • Engineer/Quant (86) $288
  • 3rd+ Year Associate (26) $284
  • Manager (4) $282
  • 2nd Year Associate (32) $253
  • 1st Year Associate (77) $191
  • Analysts (242) $181
  • Intern/Summer Associate (29) $145
  • Junior Trader (5) $102
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (282) $96
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
3
kanon's picture
kanon
99.0
4
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
5
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
6
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
98.9
7
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
8
DrApeman's picture
DrApeman
98.9
9
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
10
Jamoldo's picture
Jamoldo
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”