Does consistent alpha contradict efficient markets

Is the consistent generation of alpha by a PM a market anomaly, or at least a contradiction of market efficiency? I know it's not strictly an 'anomaly' by the definition of the term ('a price change which cannot directly be linked to current info or release of new info'), but doesn't the existence of AT LEAST 1 consistent alpha-generating PM be able to refute efficiency?

Warren Buffett that FA works, amongst others who have generated consistent abnormal returns thru FA, i.e., Peter Lynch, Bill Ackman, Howard Marks etc. Or is the explanation going to be the coin flip survival of PMs argument (pure luck, if u flip a coin half of PMs will get things correct, etc etc). How does that argument even tie into efficiency?

We know that in the semi-strong form of efficient markets, FA is useless, will not generate abnormal returns and is a less attractive option than passive investing after risk adjustments. So doesn't that mean if we can find 1 successful FA investor, this argument is refuted?

 

What makes markets efficient?

Is it random apes getting stock to go to the moon or people like Buffett doing FA on stock and moving the market through their actions? Alpha generation is a part of the efficient market because it’s what makes it efficient. Market is not always efficient 100% of the time but it generally is over a long period of time.

People doing FA and generating alpha is what makes it so that people buying broad ETFs can have pretty efficient ETFs and not half garbage in the S&P.

 

Cupiditate illo facilis enim quis et nostrum. Accusamus doloribus enim alias nihil hic. Dolorem fugit ea voluptas non. Quo sed eaque omnis veniam. Eaque qui rerum quia aut perspiciatis sint.

Est hic dicta ullam unde. Earum et quo ut dolorem consequatur placeat harum molestiae. Explicabo voluptatem mollitia consectetur non vitae.

Dignissimos blanditiis sint ullam aliquid hic labore. Numquam dolorum quia omnis quas fuga sit facere ducimus. Beatae omnis voluptatem ut assumenda ut.

Career Advancement Opportunities

April 2024 Hedge Fund

  • Point72 98.9%
  • D.E. Shaw 97.9%
  • Citadel Investment Group 96.8%
  • Magnetar Capital 95.8%
  • AQR Capital Management 94.7%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

April 2024 Hedge Fund

  • Magnetar Capital 98.9%
  • D.E. Shaw 97.8%
  • Blackstone Group 96.8%
  • Two Sigma Investments 95.7%
  • Citadel Investment Group 94.6%

Professional Growth Opportunities

April 2024 Hedge Fund

  • AQR Capital Management 99.0%
  • Point72 97.9%
  • D.E. Shaw 96.9%
  • Magnetar Capital 95.8%
  • Citadel Investment Group 94.8%

Total Avg Compensation

April 2024 Hedge Fund

  • Portfolio Manager (9) $1,648
  • Vice President (23) $474
  • Director/MD (12) $423
  • NA (6) $322
  • 3rd+ Year Associate (24) $287
  • Manager (4) $282
  • Engineer/Quant (71) $274
  • 2nd Year Associate (30) $251
  • 1st Year Associate (73) $190
  • Analysts (225) $179
  • Intern/Summer Associate (22) $131
  • Junior Trader (5) $102
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (250) $85
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
3
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
99.0
4
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
5
kanon's picture
kanon
98.9
6
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
7
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
8
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
9
numi's picture
numi
98.8
10
Kenny_Powers_CFA's picture
Kenny_Powers_CFA
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”