Having worked at and known many within the best funds, I think there is no such thing as "selective" per se. The most difficult places to get in are those where pedigree matters, so you need to have that Ivy league degree with honors, top PE experience and sometimes previous  top HF experience. This doesn't mean these people are the "best". 

So I think the most selective funds are those with extremely small teams (e.g., Himalaya, TCI, Akre) where pedigree doesn't matter as much as fit, networking, and hiring frequency (must match your timing). 

 
Most Helpful

Obvious troll post but in the 1% chance it is not, let me help you out. Your question/ this thread adds zero value (in fact it probably adds negative value for students looking to learn), and illustrates you don't understand the industry. 

First off "most secretive/selective" is super cringey.


There are a lot of funds out there that do different things and will be great places to work depending on what your investment style is and what you want to do. Sought after seats are dependent on that, then the economics of the fund (AUM/IP), and opportunities for learning and growth. If you were to say - what are some of the best places to do long biased growthy investing that are SMs and have great economics for those who contribute - you would probably get a better list. Or maybe, "what are some places that really focus on teaching you the craft for "xyz" investing and are like what Julian Roberston did for early Tiger analysts". The thing you are asking us to define is what fund has the most "exclusivity" "pedigree" "selectiveness" like you're part of some WASPY social club in NYC - in that the most important distinction to where you want to work is that + what people will think of you. 

That stuff doesn't matter and doesn't get you anywhere in this industry.The selectiveness of some firms has come from 1) their position to do very well in the cycle + fund economics made them especially attractive for talent, so they were able to impose ridiculous filtering restrictions (must be top IVY + top banking + top private equity) because even with those restrictions they still would have 50 candidates to decide from. We have discussed why pedigree matters before (and whether or not it should) but I am not going to do that here.

We don't need people thinking Baupost is more "elite" than Soros because this forum said so and "look they hired more Harvard GS APO people!" It is a false statement, irrelevant, and encourages the wrong mindset for students looking to learn about investing and break into HFs
 

 

You’re completely right and thanks for posting. I think ppl take this forum a bit too seriously sometimes and it’s ok to have fun and talk about pedigree of firms especially since it does exist. But nobody wants to engage probably because the ppl who are at these firms don’t waste their time on this platform and that’s ok.

 

Ut facilis aliquid culpa dolor beatae. Dolorum nobis dolores sequi sit et.

Voluptatem blanditiis accusamus qui possimus eaque voluptatibus. Dolor molestias iusto similique veniam esse. Doloribus magnam et voluptas quae odit voluptatibus iure. Saepe architecto consequatur quisquam doloribus natus.

Ratione amet excepturi earum sint quis. Illum vel iste possimus et. Culpa odio sed deleniti modi pariatur. Dolorem et voluptas quia quibusdam debitis. Et corrupti placeat ipsa necessitatibus necessitatibus minima.

Veritatis culpa aut sit aut reprehenderit labore iste tempora. Officiis facere quia architecto impedit vitae magnam autem. Voluptatem mollitia accusantium unde sapiente accusamus ut.

Career Advancement Opportunities

April 2024 Hedge Fund

  • Point72 98.9%
  • D.E. Shaw 97.9%
  • Magnetar Capital 96.8%
  • Citadel Investment Group 95.8%
  • AQR Capital Management 94.7%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

April 2024 Hedge Fund

  • Magnetar Capital 98.9%
  • D.E. Shaw 97.8%
  • Blackstone Group 96.8%
  • Two Sigma Investments 95.7%
  • Citadel Investment Group 94.6%

Professional Growth Opportunities

April 2024 Hedge Fund

  • AQR Capital Management 99.0%
  • Point72 97.9%
  • D.E. Shaw 96.9%
  • Citadel Investment Group 95.8%
  • Magnetar Capital 94.8%

Total Avg Compensation

April 2024 Hedge Fund

  • Portfolio Manager (9) $1,648
  • Vice President (23) $474
  • Director/MD (12) $423
  • NA (6) $322
  • 3rd+ Year Associate (24) $287
  • Manager (4) $282
  • Engineer/Quant (71) $274
  • 2nd Year Associate (30) $251
  • 1st Year Associate (73) $190
  • Analysts (225) $179
  • Intern/Summer Associate (22) $131
  • Junior Trader (5) $102
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (249) $85
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
99.0
3
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
4
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
5
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
6
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
7
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
8
kanon's picture
kanon
98.9
9
Jamoldo's picture
Jamoldo
98.8
10
numi's picture
numi
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”