Moving from Co-Invest / Secondaries to HF

I have spent the last 3 years at a small co-invest / secondaries shop as an associate. Prior to this, I was an analyst at top bank in a top group (if that matters) that regularly sends people to MF PE and HF but I ended up landing here. Was quite happy with it at the time given the combo of WLB and comp, but I've realized I want to move to public equities. I'm worried I made a mistake taking this job as I am unsure what my exit opps are now.

Would headhunters / funds be open to my background? I had a call with a BD guy at one of the pods but didn't hear back and same with another HH who said he would pitch me to Balyasny Bridger.

Would appreciate any guidance on my best path forward. FWIW I did find a guy on Linkedin who moved from AlpInvest Co-Invest to HF 10+ years ago but that was a different time.

10 Comments
 
Most Helpful

In more or less the exact same position as you so will throw my 2 cents / how I've been thinking about it - PM me if you want to swap notes or discuss approach at all. My view is that co-invest / secondaries debatably positions you better to do the actual work required at a fundamental HF, assuming you can communicate your story correctly given it is a less common background that few folks will understand / may write off without context. Have confirmed this in discussions with mentors of mine who've gone the PE -> HF -> LO route.

Co-invest / secondaries investors likely have a more transferable skillset (assuming you're not at one of the family office-type shops where diligence is more check-the-box and you are in essence a "capital solution" provider) given (i) you review a significantly higher quantum of deals than traditional buyout, meaning you can iterate on and hone in your investment review process more quickly than buyout, (ii) a greater proportion of your time is spent actually reviewing investments vs. operational and portco work - developing a 30/60/90 day plan and spearheading executive searches isn't transferrable to a HF - investment analysis is, (iii) you are (mostly) a price taker vs. price setter in co-invest/secondaries, directly akin to publics, (iv) you have likely reviewed and hopefully somewhat absorbed the investment thought process of many of the best privates investors in the world while reviewing their IC materials, helping to build your own toolkit as you retain the viewpoints you like and leave be the ones you don't, and (v) you bring a unique and contrarian background to the HF team (e.g., alpha) - which in publics is actually valued vs. the cookie cutter backgrounds preferred by private equity / banking.

All that said, the caveat and uphill battle here will be that you don't have the same stamp of approval that a MF Associate stint gives you, (which would somewhat de-risk the hire for the HF) and the resulting pipeline to some of the top funds ("pipeline" is likely generous - these seats are still quite tough to get). Overarching point is that hedge funds value performance over pedigree (unlikely PE and banking) so if your skillset enables better investment analysis and contribution to portfolio performance at the HF, and you can demonstrate it - they will recognize and value that.



 

 

Transitioning from a co-invest/secondaries role to a hedge fund (HF) focused on public equities is definitely possible, but it requires a strategic approach. Based on the most helpful WSO content, here’s what you need to know:

  1. Your Background is Not a Dealbreaker:
    While co-invest/secondaries roles are not the most traditional feeder into public equities, your prior experience as an analyst at a top bank in a strong group is a significant asset. Headhunters and funds value candidates with strong technical skills and a solid foundation in financial modeling, which you likely developed during your banking stint.

  2. Challenges You Might Face:

    • Perception of Skillset Fit: Co-invest/secondaries roles are often seen as more deal-oriented and less focused on the public markets' fast-paced, research-heavy environment. You’ll need to demonstrate your ability to analyze public companies and think like a public equities investor.
    • Networking and Headhunter Engagement: It’s not uncommon to face initial rejections or silence from headhunters, especially if your background doesn’t scream “traditional HF candidate.” Persistence and targeted networking are key.
  3. Steps to Improve Your Positioning:

    • Build a Public Equities Narrative: Highlight any transferable skills from your current role, such as valuation expertise, investment thesis development, or sector knowledge. If you’ve done any public equities investing on your own (e.g., personal portfolio, stock pitches), make sure to emphasize this.
    • Develop a Stock Pitch: Hedge funds often evaluate candidates based on their ability to pitch a stock. Prepare a well-researched, concise stock pitch that demonstrates your understanding of public markets and your ability to generate alpha.
    • Leverage Your Network: Reach out to alumni, former colleagues, or LinkedIn connections who have made similar transitions. The example you found of someone moving from AlpInvest Co-Invest to HF is a great lead—don’t hesitate to reach out and ask for advice or insights.
    • Target the Right Funds: Focus on funds that value diverse backgrounds or have a history of hiring from non-traditional paths. Pods like Balyasny and Millennium are known for being open to candidates with strong technical skills, even if they come from less conventional backgrounds.
  4. Headhunter Strategy:

    • Be proactive in reaching out to multiple headhunters who specialize in HF placements. If one HH didn’t follow up, don’t be discouraged—different headhunters have different client bases and preferences.
    • Tailor your pitch to emphasize your banking pedigree and your desire to transition into public equities. Make it clear that you’re willing to put in the work to bridge any perceived gaps in your experience.
  5. Consider Intermediate Steps:
    If breaking directly into a hedge fund proves challenging, you might explore roles that are tangentially related to public equities, such as equity research or corporate strategy. These roles can serve as stepping stones while allowing you to build relevant experience.

  6. Mindset and Persistence:
    The transition to public equities is competitive, but it’s not impossible. Many professionals have successfully made similar moves by being persistent, strategic, and open to feedback. Keep refining your approach and don’t let initial setbacks deter you.

By focusing on your strengths, addressing potential gaps, and leveraging your network, you can position yourself as a strong candidate for public equities roles. Good luck!

Sources: Any career regrets after moving from PE to public markets?, Why I Left PE & Switched to the Public Markets, https://www.wallstreetoasis.com/forum/private-equity/why-i-left-pe-switched-to-the-public-markets?customgpt=1, Breakdown of Post-IB Exit Opportunities

I'm an AI bot trained on the most helpful WSO content across 17+ years.
 

what are your thoughts on trying to move from a large credit HF (SM, public stressed/distressed) to l/s equities (MM or SM)? 

I chose to join a credit HF for my junior SA over banking, but am very interested in l/s equities. I worry I might be pigeon-holed if I join the credit HF full-time. 

 

Delectus nulla esse rerum eos. Ab minus consequuntur suscipit sint. Numquam itaque qui ut culpa. Qui eligendi dolore vel voluptate quia.

Alias rerum qui et quia laborum. Quibusdam cumque dolores amet. Sed sapiente alias aut quos ut. Aperiam at nesciunt unde omnis deleniti consequatur omnis. Dignissimos dolore quis corporis dolores et.

Perspiciatis aut molestiae incidunt natus numquam ab. Ducimus nulla omnis non praesentium. Error enim sint voluptas quas quasi.

Doloribus doloremque rem id maiores. Et tempore ad voluptatem doloribus omnis enim praesentium animi. Quam quaerat totam deleniti. Reiciendis perspiciatis non dignissimos in. Recusandae dolor nisi sunt provident iste natus nobis.

Career Advancement Opportunities

June 2026 Hedge Fund

  • Point72 99.0%
  • D.E. Shaw 98.1%
  • Citadel Investment Group 97.1%
  • AQR Capital Management 96.2%
  • Magnetar Capital 95.2%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

June 2026 Hedge Fund

  • Magnetar Capital 99.0%
  • Millennium Partners 98.1%
  • D.E. Shaw 97.1%
  • Blackstone Group 96.1%
  • Citadel Investment Group 95.1%

Professional Growth Opportunities

June 2026 Hedge Fund

  • AQR Capital Management 99.1%
  • Point72 98.1%
  • D.E. Shaw 97.2%
  • Citadel Investment Group 96.2%
  • Magnetar Capital 95.3%

Total Avg Compensation

June 2026 Hedge Fund

  • Portfolio Manager (9) $1,648
  • Vice President (27) $464
  • Director/MD (12) $423
  • NA (9) $320
  • Engineer/Quant (86) $288
  • 3rd+ Year Associate (26) $284
  • Manager (4) $282
  • 2nd Year Associate (32) $253
  • 1st Year Associate (76) $192
  • Analysts (240) $181
  • Intern/Summer Associate (28) $146
  • Junior Trader (5) $102
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (282) $96
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”