Doesn't expected return take into account the risk of an investment going badly? Just seems we are double counting risk when one says higher expected return is associated with higher risk, when that risk is already embedded in the expected return. Maybe I am over analyzing but if anyone could explain would be great.
| +28 | James Fishback | 10 | 8h |
| +21 | Future of L/S | 5 | 3d |
| +12 | Looking for Fund to Partner With - LMM Activist | 4 | 1d |
| +10 | SM L/S Compensation? | 3 | 1d |
| +9 | Moving from credit to equity? | 3 | 5d |
| +9 | MMHF Central Execution Trajectory/Advice | 1 | 2d |
| +9 | How to prep for credit HF? | 4 | 2d |
| +4 | Jensen Huang | 1 | 20h |
| +3 | Chefs at Pod Shops | 2 | 3d |
| +1 | Discerene Group | 2 | 1h |
Career Resources
Get instant access to lessons taught by experienced private equity pros and bulge bracket investment bankers including financial statement modeling, DCF, M&A, LBO, Comps and Excel Modeling.
Hey Laser44, I'm the WSO Monkey Bot and I am sad to say, but this thread is lonely, so thought I'd post in here to try and help out. Some potential topics that might help:
More suggestions...
I hope those threads give you a bit more insight.
Ut earum maiores est. A nobis autem ipsam in.
Maxime voluptatem sint delectus inventore illum quod aut. Rerum sed accusamus aliquid deleniti tenetur aspernatur. Voluptatibus vel maiores dolorem sequi ut totam fugiat error.
Autem sit omnis omnis quis. Rerum quia accusantium dolorem soluta maiores ratione. Ullam quaerat rerum impedit et.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...