SBC Treatment

For those who are actually at funds, how do you model SBC?

The correct way to treat it is obviously as a real expense that shouldn't be removed from earnings or FCF/OCF. However, one point I am unsure about is how to treat the tax considerations. When doing comps the proper way, for operating EBITDA, you can take Adj. EBITDA and subtract SBC since taxes are excluded. But when calculating net income, is the proper way to do adjusted net income - SBC or adjusted net income - SBC * (1-tax rate or cash tax rate)?

I am unfamiliar with all the tax nuances around SBC, so if anyone has good ways to think about this it would be appreciated. I would think some of the ex. PE guys on here have good takes?

5 Comments
 

My entire post is pretty clearly saying that the corporate finance definition if plain wrong for how SBC is treated… I understand how it works in modern finance definitions but those definitions obfuscate the real economics of a business.

I think SBC should be moved to the CFF section of the cash flow statement and therefore I exclude it from FCF. You have to both expense it and dilute share count if you are modeling a company out (assuming you model capital allocation as those on the buyside should).

My question was related to the tax effects, I currently do adjusted net income * (1-nongaap tax rate)/ DSO to get to a real economic EPS number. I wanted to see if anyone had a better way of looking at the tax effects. Like is it better to use cash tax rate?

 

Doloremque maxime praesentium itaque tenetur accusamus fuga aspernatur. Culpa quas illum qui asperiores nobis perspiciatis quod. Aut accusamus exercitationem est adipisci et architecto. Nemo qui quas quis consequatur ab suscipit delectus. Et commodi ducimus autem et.

Totam nisi illo perspiciatis qui molestias ratione placeat sint. Qui illum enim nulla et. Aut vel eligendi quo quo sit optio iure. Ut qui accusantium cumque assumenda non aut.

Deleniti et qui expedita quibusdam. Ut ex aut laborum ducimus modi et. Laudantium temporibus repellendus aliquid assumenda dolores velit.

Career Advancement Opportunities

June 2026 Hedge Fund

  • Point72 99.0%
  • D.E. Shaw 98.1%
  • AQR Capital Management 97.1%
  • Citadel Investment Group 96.1%
  • Magnetar Capital 95.1%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

June 2026 Hedge Fund

  • Magnetar Capital 99.0%
  • D.E. Shaw 98.0%
  • Blackstone Group 97.0%
  • Citadel Investment Group 96.0%
  • Millennium Partners 95.0%

Professional Growth Opportunities

June 2026 Hedge Fund

  • AQR Capital Management 99.0%
  • Point72 98.1%
  • D.E. Shaw 97.1%
  • Citadel Investment Group 96.2%
  • Magnetar Capital 95.2%

Total Avg Compensation

June 2026 Hedge Fund

  • Portfolio Manager (9) $1,648
  • Vice President (27) $464
  • Director/MD (12) $423
  • NA (9) $320
  • Engineer/Quant (86) $288
  • 3rd+ Year Associate (26) $284
  • Manager (4) $282
  • 2nd Year Associate (32) $253
  • 1st Year Associate (77) $191
  • Analysts (242) $181
  • Intern/Summer Associate (29) $145
  • Junior Trader (5) $102
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (282) $96
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
3
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
4
kanon's picture
kanon
99.0
5
DrApeman's picture
DrApeman
98.9
6
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
7
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
8
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
98.9
9
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
10
Jamoldo's picture
Jamoldo
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”