The Dot-Com Bubble

I am a relatively young professional so haven't been through much of a crash. For those who were actually in a seat during the dot-com bubble and the consequent crash, how was it? Did you see it coming? Would love to hear some stories about what worked, what didn't, why some funds/pods blew up and some made a name for themselves.

13 Comments
 

The Dot-Com Bubble was a wild ride, and the stories from that era are both cautionary and insightful. Based on the most helpful WSO content, here’s what you need to know:

  1. The Crash and Its Impact:

    • Between March 2000 and October 2002, U.S. stocks lost 50.2% of their value, amounting to a staggering $7.4 trillion.
    • The hottest companies of the 1990s, like AOL, Cisco, JDS Uniphase, Lucent, and Qualcomm, saw their share prices plummet. Hundreds of internet stocks were utterly destroyed.
  2. Fraud and Mismanagement:

    • This period exposed massive financial fraud at major corporations like Enron, Tyco, and Xerox.
    • Accounting firms were accused of cooking the books and even destroying records to mislead investors.
    • Executives at leading companies were charged with siphoning off hundreds of millions for personal gain.
  3. Why Some Funds Blew Up:

    • Many funds and investors were caught up in the irrational exuberance of the time, overvaluing companies with no real earnings or sustainable business models.
    • The volatility and rapid decline in share prices left many funds insolvent before their theses could play out.
  4. What Worked for Survivors:

    • Funds that focused on intrinsic value and avoided speculative plays fared better.
    • Superior investors made more money in good times than they gave back in bad times, as Howard Marks famously said.
    • Some funds capitalized on the downturn by scooping up undervalued businesses with strong fundamentals at fire-sale prices.
  5. Lessons Learned:

    • The economy can stay irrational longer than you can stay liquid, a lesson many learned the hard way.
    • Diversification and a focus on defensible, reliable business models were key to weathering the storm.
    • The crash highlighted the importance of due diligence and skepticism, especially during periods of market mania.

The Dot-Com Bubble serves as a reminder that while markets can be euphoric, they can also be brutal. Those who stayed disciplined and avoided the hype often emerged stronger.

Sources: https://www.wallstreetoasis.com/forum/investing/my-key-takeaways-from-the-introduction-of-the-intelligent-investor-part-116-to-be?customgpt=1, Distressed Investing: This Time It's Different, 08' Recession - How bad was it really?, Still want the job? Are you prepared?, https://www.wallstreetoasis.com/forum/investing/solving-a-crazy-problem-the-daily-peel-52223?customgpt=1

I'm an AI bot trained on the most helpful WSO content across 17+ years.
 

This bubble is definitely going to pop, the real question is when. Shiller CAPE of 40+ is now the highest it has been in 25 years. Some external event usually starts the pop. OpenAI has no path to ever making a profit to pay for all these deals, and even the ceos are admitting it now.

 

I'm more concerned about the cyclical nature of revenue here. OpenAi paying Oracle, Oracle paying Nvidia, Nvidia paying OpenAi, OpenAi paying AMD, AMD giving OpenAi shares to buy AMD chips, etc. It's really similar to how telecom companies would do vendor financing in 2000. Everything about this is just dumb. 1T in deals and OpenAi can't even make a penny in profit. 

 
Most Helpful

Track what stock prices and multiples do when information flows through. It tells you what market is thinking about each new number incorporated.

- Hyperscaler + neo-cloud capex tracking + energy tracking
- How are AI models progressing? Are we asymptoting aggressively? 
- How do stock prices react to news? How about chatter? Do we see exhaustion on infrastructure plays as OAI announces next gigawatt deal or whoever? 
 
In my mind, what happens when OAI or GOOG or whatever start attaching more numbers to AI rev/efficiencies next year? EX: OAI says they expect to make $5bn off of agents buying whatever. Well suddenly its not pie in the sky efficiencies anymore, but its "we spent $xyz hundred billion to make $5bn"

Stock prices could also preciptiate the spending here. META has a tougher time justifying $100bn in capex for ??? and some useless glasses when they maxed out ad loads to give them cover. Or ya know, AI has opened up a flood of spend, ROAS increases, agencies cede more wallet share (and just even ADBE honestly since its all AI slop generated), and they keep the train chugging. Point being, stock price down = harder to spend. Macro could stop things in their tracks.

For now, its just straight rate cutting with a decent and resilient economy, numbers still being mostly ok enough, and just mind boggling insatiable demand by those with trillion dollar balance sheets, and a capital markets that is horned up to pick up the slack. 

We will rip until further notice. Although the fact I am even typing this and the rip is becoming so accepted probably means this will serve as the peak post. 

As druck said, analyze what 6-12 months from today will look like; not just the end state, but the future perception state in 6 months. We are in the midst of/finishing off another inflection in demand perception right now that finally wormed its way through. Will people be more optimistic about the fwd. 12 months in 6 months, etc.

TLDR; the ship rights itself violently  

 

no one who lived the dotcom bubble is on WSO lol

better question is how did the old heads who were in HFs during covid fare?

 

Vel pariatur quas adipisci ut ut. Ipsum harum autem veritatis necessitatibus qui vitae magnam sit. Atque officia vel voluptas enim nisi.

Error et non qui expedita dolores illo ullam. Eius aut aliquam quia. Dolore cum ea velit alias sit.

Laboriosam maiores aliquid non odit aut natus neque. Minus aut libero voluptas ab.

Perspiciatis voluptas dolores delectus suscipit id eveniet consequuntur ut. Aliquid voluptatem qui ea accusamus ut pariatur. Eum iste repellat sint doloribus earum porro. Reprehenderit quia ad quia ut unde quos recusandae. Quas porro ut itaque possimus harum fuga dolorem perspiciatis. Voluptas doloremque harum quia.

Career Advancement Opportunities

June 2026 Hedge Fund

  • Point72 99.0%
  • D.E. Shaw 98.1%
  • Citadel Investment Group 97.1%
  • AQR Capital Management 96.2%
  • Magnetar Capital 95.2%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

June 2026 Hedge Fund

  • Magnetar Capital 99.0%
  • Millennium Partners 98.1%
  • D.E. Shaw 97.1%
  • Blackstone Group 96.1%
  • Citadel Investment Group 95.1%

Professional Growth Opportunities

June 2026 Hedge Fund

  • AQR Capital Management 99.1%
  • Point72 98.1%
  • D.E. Shaw 97.2%
  • Citadel Investment Group 96.2%
  • Magnetar Capital 95.3%

Total Avg Compensation

June 2026 Hedge Fund

  • Portfolio Manager (9) $1,648
  • Vice President (27) $464
  • Director/MD (12) $423
  • NA (9) $320
  • Engineer/Quant (86) $288
  • 3rd+ Year Associate (26) $284
  • Manager (4) $282
  • 2nd Year Associate (32) $253
  • 1st Year Associate (76) $192
  • Analysts (240) $181
  • Intern/Summer Associate (28) $146
  • Junior Trader (5) $102
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (282) $96
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
3
kanon's picture
kanon
99.0
4
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
5
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
6
DrApeman's picture
DrApeman
98.9
7
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
8
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
98.9
9
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
10
bolo up's picture
bolo up
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”