Why is Telecom undervalued?

can anyone explain why the current undervaluation in telecom stocks?

Check out JP Morgan guide to the market 3Q15 version, telecom sector is still trading below historical forward PE and higher than historical average div yield.

3 Comments
 
Best Response

Setting aside whether they're UNDER-valued, the real question is why do companies/industries trade at multiple X of metric Y (dividend yield is a multiple at the end of the day). The two main things, in my eyes, are growth expectations and degree of certainty (setting aside things like WACC/risk free rates). You say that the sector is trading below historical forward P/E multiples, but that alone doesn't tell you much. What if historically, forward EPS showed 5% growth and now analysts think they'll be declining? Dividend yields are an even clearer example-my trailing dividend yield doesn't mean much to me if the company generates less FCF and has to cut its dividend.

In the case of telecom specifically, the short answer is that people expect long-term, secular pressure on legacy voice-based carriers (RLECs/CLECs/ILECs/etc) and require a higher dividend yield (or lower EBITDA/EPS multiple) to compensate for the fact that in 5 years your dividend (or EBITDA or EPS) will probably be lower. This isn't "new", but people have become more focused on it due to a few things that may increase competition/accelerate legacy voice declines-for example consolidation in cable and changes in how people consume video.

This is also a good example of looking through an index to the members within it. For example within the S&P 500 telecom index you have 5 companies: VZ, T, CTL, FTR, and LVLT.
You can divide these into 3 groups: VZ and T are incumbents copper-based wireline operators with leading wireless franchises that offset the declining revenue from their fixed (landline) business. Both are expected to grow topline next year, and both trade at high-single digits of trailing EBITDA.

FTR and CTL are smaller copper-based LECs. FTR's tricky because of all their M&A but both are expected to see organic revenue declines and both trade ~5-7x PF trailing EBITDA.

LVLT is a fiber-based backhaul provider that grows like crazy and trades at 15x trailing EBITDA.

There have been many great comebacks throughout history. Jesus was dead but then came back as an all-powerful God-Zombie.
 
"Kenny_Powers_CFA"

Setting aside whether they're UNDER-valued, the real question is why do companies/industries trade at multiple X of metric Y (dividend yield is a multiple at the end of the day).
The two main things, in my eyes, are growth expectations and degree of certainty (setting aside things like WACC/risk free rates).
You say that the sector is trading below historical forward P/E multiples, but that alone doesn't tell you much. What if historically, forward EPS showed 5% growth and now analysts think they'll be declining?
Dividend yields are an even clearer example-my trailing dividend yield doesn't mean much to me if the company generates less FCF and has to cut its dividend.

In the case of telecom specifically, the short answer is that people expect long-term, secular pressure on legacy voice-based carriers (RLECs/CLECs/ILECs/etc) and require a higher dividend yield (or lower EBITDA/EPS multiple) to compensate for the fact that in 5 years your dividend (or EBITDA or EPS) will probably be lower. This isn't "new", but people have become more focused on it due to a few things that may increase competition/accelerate legacy voice declines-for example consolidation in cable and changes in how people consume video.

This is also a good example of looking through an index to the members within it. For example within the S&P 500 telecom index you have 5 companies: VZ, T, CTL, FTR, and LVLT.
You can divide these into 3 groups:
VZ and T are incumbents copper-based wireline operators with leading wireless franchises that offset the declining revenue from their fixed (landline) business. Both are expected to grow topline next year, and both trade at high-single digits of trailing EBITDA.

FTR and CTL are smaller copper-based LECs. FTR's tricky because of all their M&A but both are expected to see organic revenue declines and both trade ~5-7x PF trailing EBITDA.

LVLT is a fiber-based backhaul provider that grows like crazy and trades at 15x trailing EBITDA.

you a TMT or telecom guy aren't you.

 

Iste sunt omnis amet veniam veritatis amet incidunt. Assumenda et non sint labore consequuntur veniam beatae voluptate. Porro commodi voluptatem recusandae ullam voluptatibus ut. Consequatur ut aut deleniti fugiat fugit molestias. Et fuga et at quis quos qui.

Error corrupti reiciendis nesciunt est. Qui magnam dolorem qui labore nobis voluptatum. Unde praesentium aliquid voluptatem. Enim magnam iusto est eius nostrum saepe saepe. Voluptatum libero aliquid facere eos corrupti sit. Est animi quia et aut pariatur atque.

Fuga at facere unde at temporibus. Omnis qui atque vel et. Voluptatem voluptatem nihil dolores voluptatibus praesentium error ut repudiandae.

Et itaque numquam quaerat fugit et ut autem. Qui omnis veniam libero in non impedit deserunt. Numquam aut porro repellendus impedit pariatur amet. Quia error quia eum ex deserunt. Consequatur non quibusdam aut vero est quisquam aut. Suscipit maxime deserunt eos est libero minima eveniet. Dolorum impedit pariatur similique in.

Career Advancement Opportunities

September 2026 Hedge Fund

  • Point72 99.0%
  • D.E. Shaw 98.0%
  • Citadel Investment Group 97.0%
  • AQR Capital Management 96.0%
  • Magnetar Capital 95.0%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

September 2026 Hedge Fund

  • Magnetar Capital 99.0%
  • D.E. Shaw 98.0%
  • Blackstone Group 97.0%
  • Citadel Investment Group 96.0%
  • Two Sigma Investments 94.9%

Professional Growth Opportunities

September 2026 Hedge Fund

  • AQR Capital Management 99.0%
  • Point72 98.0%
  • D.E. Shaw 97.1%
  • Citadel Investment Group 96.1%
  • Magnetar Capital 95.1%

Total Avg Compensation

September 2026 Hedge Fund

  • Portfolio Manager (9) $1,648
  • Vice President (27) $464
  • Director/MD (11) $372
  • NA (9) $320
  • Engineer/Quant (83) $287
  • 3rd+ Year Associate (26) $284
  • Manager (4) $282
  • 2nd Year Associate (32) $253
  • 1st Year Associate (76) $193
  • Analysts (234) $178
  • Intern/Summer Associate (29) $145
  • Junior Trader (5) $102
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (276) $95
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
3
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
4
kanon's picture
kanon
99.0
5
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
6
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
7
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
98.9
8
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
9
DrApeman's picture
DrApeman
98.9
10
bolo up's picture
bolo up
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”