Trending Content - Hedge Fund Forum
Career Resources
WSO Free Modeling Series - Now Open Through
June 30, 2026
9 Free Financial Modeling Lessons
Get instant access to lessons taught by experienced private equity pros and bulge bracket investment bankers including financial statement modeling, DCF, M&A, LBO, Comps and Excel Modeling.
+Bonus: Get 27 financial modeling templates in swipe file
+Bonus: Get 27 financial modeling templates in swipe file
High Finance Applications
Guaranteed
Get at least one offer GUARANTEED
- 1:1 support
- 92% success rate
- 2,000+ mentor network
- Unlimited Live bootcamps
- AI for resume + LinkedIn
- Networking automation tools
- HireVue simulation tool
- Full course library
- Private Slack community
- 20hrs of mocks
- + much more...
Setting aside whether they're UNDER-valued, the real question is why do companies/industries trade at multiple X of metric Y (dividend yield is a multiple at the end of the day). The two main things, in my eyes, are growth expectations and degree of certainty (setting aside things like WACC/risk free rates). You say that the sector is trading below historical forward P/E multiples, but that alone doesn't tell you much. What if historically, forward EPS showed 5% growth and now analysts think they'll be declining? Dividend yields are an even clearer example-my trailing dividend yield doesn't mean much to me if the company generates less FCF and has to cut its dividend.
In the case of telecom specifically, the short answer is that people expect long-term, secular pressure on legacy voice-based carriers (RLECs/CLECs/ILECs/etc) and require a higher dividend yield (or lower EBITDA/EPS multiple) to compensate for the fact that in 5 years your dividend (or EBITDA or EPS) will probably be lower. This isn't "new", but people have become more focused on it due to a few things that may increase competition/accelerate legacy voice declines-for example consolidation in cable and changes in how people consume video.
This is also a good example of looking through an index to the members within it. For example within the S&P 500 telecom index you have 5 companies: VZ, T, CTL, FTR, and LVLT.
You can divide these into 3 groups: VZ and T are incumbents copper-based wireline operators with leading wireless franchises that offset the declining revenue from their fixed (landline) business. Both are expected to grow topline next year, and both trade at high-single digits of trailing EBITDA.
FTR and CTL are smaller copper-based LECs. FTR's tricky because of all their M&A but both are expected to see organic revenue declines and both trade ~5-7x PF trailing EBITDA.
LVLT is a fiber-based backhaul provider that grows like crazy and trades at 15x trailing EBITDA.
you a TMT or telecom guy aren't you.
Et iste et vel. Beatae vitae dolore et aspernatur voluptate impedit enim.
Qui recusandae qui nihil laboriosam. Eius quaerat quaerat vero sed et accusantium dolor. Minima velit excepturi assumenda voluptate.
Non saepe sit inventore expedita iure. Et sunt ut quis ipsam culpa et aliquid. Aut aut deleniti sit distinctio. Doloremque occaecati aut laboriosam nesciunt natus iusto qui. Perspiciatis qui qui rerum debitis et.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...