3 Statement Model Query - Need Some Expert Advice

Hi all,

I am seeking some advice from some more experienced chimps while I practice building 3-statement models in preparation for modeling tests during the interview process. 

After successfully building out all 3 statements' historicals (with correct balance in historical years) I've arrived at a query regarding the linking between the balance sheet and the cash flow and subsequently achieving the balance of the balance sheet in the first projected year.

After ensuring all changes in balance sheet line items are accounted for in the cash flow statement, I've found that 2 line items in my cash flow statement (which was downloaded from Factset) aren't linked to any line items in the balance sheet.

Balance Sheet For Reference:

Assets:

Liabilities + Equity:

The following items that do not have a clear direct link to the balance sheet are as follows:

Operation Activities:

Other funds:  27.1

Investing Activities:

Acquisitions & Other: (19.5)

As a result, the balance sheet is unbalanced by 7.6, as these cash flow line items aren't accounted for in the balance sheet. //////   7.6 =  27.1 + (19.5) 

In summary, how should one account for these cash flow line items in the balance sheet in order to achieve balance? Should they be incorporated into "Common Equity" as a catch-all adjustment? 

P.S. Keep in mind - the context of this exercise is in a time-pressure test situation

Thanks for your help,

- Aspiring Chimp 

4 Comments
 

Would need to take a proper look at the model / file to understand the Q but generally, you don't have to model and link historical statements together. Just start modeling & linking from first projection year. This way you avoid the need to project / model one-off line items appearing in historicals. For example, if in FY-1 theres a line item in CFS on acquisitions, you can assume this does not occur in the future (i.e. don't include it going fwd). Same for Other Funds line. Don't model historicals, that's key.

 

Sit autem aspernatur qui et ad earum ut numquam. Sit vel animi animi non doloremque est vero. Dolorem quo dolorem deserunt impedit distinctio.

Career Advancement Opportunities

August 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.4%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.9%
  • JPMorgan 01 98.3%
  • Morgan Stanley 08 97.8%
  • Goldman Sachs 02 97.2%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

August 2026 Investment Banking

  • Moelis & Company No 99.4%
  • Evercore No 98.9%
  • Morgan Stanley 01 98.3%
  • Banco Santander 02 97.8%
  • BMO Capital Markets 12 97.2%

Professional Growth Opportunities

August 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.4%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.9%
  • Morgan Stanley 06 98.3%
  • Goldman Sachs 01 97.8%
  • JPMorgan 01 97.2%

Total Avg Compensation

August 2026 Investment Banking

  • Vice President (16) $429
  • Associates (48) $259
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (8) $210
  • 2nd Year Analyst (25) $178
  • Intern/Summer Associate (14) $159
  • 1st Year Analyst (83) $151
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (75) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
3
kanon's picture
kanon
99.0
4
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
5
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
6
DrApeman's picture
DrApeman
98.9
7
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
8
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
9
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
98.9
10
bolo up's picture
bolo up
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”