7 Comments
 

Yeah. I've worked with buyers who do the following when presented with synergies:

  1. Assume 50% of the presented cost synergies will actually be realized
  2. Completely ignore any revenue synergies

It's fair take. I saw a BCG report once that said less than 1/3rd of all M&A transactions actually add value.

 

Smh I don't get it. Can someone maybe just briefly elaborate on why the multiple should be smaller if synergies are taken into consideration? Common sense would be that this is sth that lets me justify a higer purchase price.

 
Most Helpful

Sure - you're creating make believe value in the denominator that would have never been earned... because synergies can only happen in the future.

This equation now looks like this:

(Today's Enterprise Value Based on Not Having Synergies Between the Two Companies) / (Combined EBITDA of Yesterday or Last 12 Months With Having Synergies)

Your numerator is unaffected and your denominator theoretically increased. In reality, if those synergies had been recognized throughout the year... the EV would be greater. In other words, if your combined LTM EBITDA was $20 and with synergies it was $22... your EV could be $100 without synergies and with synergies (built into the full year) it could be something like $112. Which gives you a valuation 5.0x vs 5.09x.

tl;dr: you're not making an apples to apples comparison when you compare (EV) to (LTM EBITDA and synergies).

You would need to do: (EV with 12 months of magical synergies built in) to (LTM EBITDA and synergies).

Note: I've never heard of a proposed M&A deal being valued using EV / LTM EBITDA & synergies. I'm just a lowly liberal arts college student, though so don't take my word for it.

 

Vel inventore et distinctio maiores at. Explicabo magnam a sunt aut. Illo hic repellat eum occaecati laborum placeat explicabo. Dolore temporibus amet a delectus unde est quia. Laborum sed asperiores vel necessitatibus ut quia aut ipsam. Cupiditate sit neque error nobis dolorem.

Tempora et eum voluptatibus laudantium sit ullam ratione. Suscipit incidunt non eius exercitationem neque nobis ut. Maiores sed ut nesciunt optio quaerat. Debitis similique voluptatem sint rerum eligendi et officiis.

Asperiores at eos beatae. Ab in esse totam. Earum molestiae recusandae ut consequatur veritatis ratione nesciunt. Sint ex at ea molestiae rerum in.

Tenetur dicta autem molestiae incidunt. Repudiandae soluta quam a. Sit amet esse explicabo vero. Eveniet et tenetur possimus nihil. Sint sint qui adipisci magnam ipsum libero dolor.

Career Advancement Opportunities

October 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.5%
  • Moelis & Company 01 99.0%
  • JPMorgan 01 98.4%
  • Guggenheim Partners 02 97.9%
  • Morgan Stanley 06 97.4%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

October 2026 Investment Banking

  • Moelis & Company No 99.5%
  • Morgan Stanley 02 99.0%
  • Evercore 01 98.4%
  • Banco Santander 02 97.9%
  • BMO Capital Markets 13 97.4%

Professional Growth Opportunities

October 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.5%
  • Moelis & Company 01 99.0%
  • Morgan Stanley 05 98.4%
  • Goldman Sachs 01 97.9%
  • JPMorgan No 97.4%

Total Avg Compensation

October 2026 Investment Banking

  • Vice President (16) $429
  • Associates (57) $264
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (8) $210
  • 2nd Year Analyst (28) $184
  • Intern/Summer Associate (16) $161
  • 1st Year Analyst (84) $151
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (76) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
kanon's picture
kanon
99.0
3
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
4
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
5
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
6
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
7
DrApeman's picture
DrApeman
98.9
8
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
98.9
9
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
10
numi's picture
numi
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”